Nick Gillespie | March 9, 2006
Via Drudge comes this celebrity response to the Hurricane Katrina snafu. So who said it: Faith Hill, Hillary Clinton, or Clint Eastwood?
The answer is here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In the great tradition of country singing bubbleheaded, bleach
blond, bimbos like Natalie Manes, it is Faith Hill.
Yeah, well I fear for my country to when people can't pick up the
pieces for themselves and the federal government is responsible for
every tragedy natural or manmade that befalls anyone, anytime,
anywhere.
In the great tradition of country singing bubbleheaded,
bleach blond, bimbos like Natalie Manes, it is Faith
Hill.
It's hard to argue with considered, thoughtful comments like that!
Is it your position that anyone who thinks the feds should offer
competent help in disasters or dislikes the president is
automatically stupid and sexually promiscuous?
It's hard to argue with considered, thoughtful comments like
that! Is it your position that anyone who thinks the feds should
offer competent help in disasters or dislikes the president is
automatically stupid and sexually promiscuous?
boyakasha
So Faith Hill's going on the Enemies List too.
So which celebs are we still allowed to like? Kirk Cameron (doing
God's work in the Left Behind series) and . . . uh? Dennis Miller
has been making "I'm really more of a libertarian actually" noises
of late.
I think there's an evangelical Baldwin brother. And that guy on Charles in Charge. Not Chachi, the other guy.
Celebrity gossip on Reason. Hmmm.
*scratches balls, tugs on can of Coors*
BEEEELCH! What the hall y'all doin' 'round here?
""When you have people dying because they're poor and black
or poor and white, or because of whatever they are -- if that's a
number on a political scale -- then that is the most wrong thing.
That erases everything that's great about our country."
Wait, wait, just wait a fucking minute, asshole! If our country's
"greatness" can be erased simply because people die because of
"whatever they are", or, more accurately, where they are,
then I would posit that our "greatness" ain's that substantial to
begin with. What a crock of shite. Our country's greatness is
not measured by how well the government
protects its people from their own mistakes [building their homes
in hurricane row].
McGraw specifically criticized President Bush. "There's no
reason why someone can't go down there who's supposed to be the
leader of the free world � and say, 'I'm giving you a job to do and
I'm not leaving here until it's done. And you're held accountable,
and you're held accountable, and you're held accountable.
"'This is what I've given you to do, and if it's not done by the
time I get back on my plane, then you're fired and someone else
will be in your place. '"
Yes, that's why the cleanup is so slow. Because Bush isn't down
there yelling at people. No, it's a failure because of what John
touched on above. The government has given the people this false
idea that they have the "right" to be protected from any and
everything that happens to them. And when it can't, they are
helpless---because they've grown apathetic and rested on the
assumption that they'll be protected. It's partly their fault, and
partly the government's fault.
Along the president's route, some frustrated residents held up
signs in protest, one asking "Where's my government?" and another
telling the president to "cut the red tape and help us."
Maybe you should help yourselves---not to be too callous or
anything. The more the government helps them now, the more likely
they will be to rely on the government next time. Touch a hot
stove, get burned. Yes, it fuckin' sucks that the residents of N.O.
had to learn this lesson the hard way, but it would be a true
tragedy if it was all for naught...if they went through this mess,
and didn't learn a single thing from it. THAT would be the real
tragedy---and I'm afraid that it's happening as we speak.
"I fear for our country if we can't handle our people [during] a
natural disaster. And I can't stand to see it. It doesn't take a
brain surgeon to figure out point A to point B. . . . And they
can't even skip from point A to point B."
Yes, they're incompetent. We get it. So, what did we learn here?
Don't rely on idiotic beaurocunts to save your sorry ass from a
watery grave, simply because you decided to reside in a big
sinkhole right in hurricane alley.
Honestly, all this pining on about how the government failed us is
great...but it needs to be followed up with something that matters.
Faith and Tim can blather about government until their faces turn
blue---but it will be the same thing next time. These failures
aren't something that can be "fixed"...they are inherent in The
State. So, Tim, Faith, if you want to make a difference, go out
there and urge your fans to vote their idiot reps and senators out
of office---urge them to demand that their tax dollars not be
wasted on the boondoggle they call "DHS". It's obvious that the
public sector is a massive failure when it comes to protecting its
citizenry from anything but a sovereign threat---so give us our
money back, and let the private sector do what the public sector
cannot.
I was in Houston last weekend and the local news had a piece
about how through some government screwup these Katrina evacuees
had their electricity cut off. The news made it sound like a
tragedy. All I could think is Katrina happened in August, we are
now in March of the next year and you dumb asses are still
depending on FEMA to feed, clothe and house you. You are in
Houston, a huge city with a about 4% unemployment rate and you
can't get off your ass and start supporting yourself six months
after coming there. This is rediculous.
If you can't figure that fact out and think it is a national shame
that the government can't fix everyone's problems for them, then
yes Les you are bubbleheaded, bleach blond bimbo. Every libertarian
on here who whines about the lack of government response to Katrina
ought to be ashamed of themselves for not expecting people to take
care of themselves and faulting the government for not doing
exactly what they as libertarians preach constantly it ought not to
be doing.
John,
To be fair, some of the fault lies with the government, for
actively presenting themselves as being able to handle disasters.
Not to mention federally subsidized flood and coastal house
insurance in hurricane-prone areas which distorts the natural
disincentivizing process that would normally keep people out of
hurricane alley. These people didn't come to depend on the
government all by themselves---they had help from the idiot pols
that promised them that the government is here to help them.
*scratches balls, tugs on can of Coors*
Dude, that's disgusting! Coors is a headache in a can.
And that guy on Charles in Charge. Not Chachi, the other
guy. -Brian
That would be Willie Aames. He's probably trying to cleanse his
soul after soiling it by doing the voice of Hank the Ranger in the
"Dungeons and Dragons" cartoon. Because we all know how satanic
"Dungeons and Dragons" is. Of course I'm being sarcastic...In my
view the D&D cartoon was the only cool thing he ever did.
If you can't figure that fact out and think it is a national
shame that the government can't fix everyone's problems for them,
then yes Les you are bubbleheaded, bleach blond bimbo.
Okay, all joking aside, why lump Natalie Manes in there? Because
she publically expressed her displeasure with the president? And
who, exactly, is arguing that the government should "fix
everyone's problems for them"?
Bush and the feds made it clear that they would be there for the
victims of the hurricane. Why shouldn't the average citizen expect
help when the government (the one that's rebuilding countries on
the other side of the world) promises it to them? This
administration has done nothing to make people think they should
take care of themselves.
I'm not saying I agree with the country stars, but I think you're
building strawmen out of your frustration.
I don't get it.
It's been over 6 months since the disaster happened -- nobody's
life in in peril.
Are they complaining because they aren't rebuilding fast enough,
i.e. creating the next disaster?
As somebody living in the most boring part of the country -- where
the chances of my house being knocked out of its misery are about
zero -- I am a little offended that these rich country music stars
want to give my money to people who find Houston too boring and
therefore want to move back below sea level in time for the next
hurricane season.
Is Faith one of the Dixie Chicks?
I was born and raised in Music City, but I've lost track of who's
who.
This matters because outcomes of elections often rest on the all-important celebrity caucus.
Ammonium, that's a good point. It would be interesting to know
just how much they've given to help the victims of the
hurricane.
Ruthless,
Faith is not one of the Dixie Chicks. I don't care for their songs,
but their talent as musicians and singers is undeniable, especially
when they play bluegrass. Faith Hill is more like a stripper who
can carry a tune.
I'd be more impressed with either of these Nashholes spouting off if there was any indication that they'd been down in New Orleans themselves hauling away debris or whatever needs doing these days.
Seems like some of you are involking the Glenn Grenwald
corollary for any Bush criticism.
Bush is a goddamn disgrace along with the rest of his
administration right down the line. And the sycophantic GOP/DLC
congress isn't much better.
Who's Faith Hill?
Now Lohan, I know who she is cause she's in that Herbie movie the
kids like.
No no, them, those stupid poor people over there, and anyone who
goes on camera and talks about them - they're the ones you're
supposed to hate.
Not President Flightsuit. Oh, no.
Funny, I thought the blithering bottle-blonde bubbleheaded bimbo
in question was Thomas
Jefferson:
I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just ; that His justice cannot sleep forever ; that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of situation is among possible events; that it may become probable by supernatural interference! The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in such a contest."
Why does Jefferson hate America?
I wonder, are the people who "built their houses in hurricaine row" the people living in 200 year old houses, the people living in public housing, or the people who could only find apartments they could afford in century-old apartment houses in the low-lying neighborhoods?
Yes, Joe, play the class card. The fact that they're
poor changes everything.
The fact that they're criticizing the government is fine. But it's
not fine that they're making it seem like human beings are helpless
and need the government to come rebuild their lives for them. Bush
fucked up, his administration fucked up; this is par for the
course. They're going to keep on fucking up. So maybe it's time to
take home a moral from this goddamned story, instead of just crying
for the gubment to come bail them out---that's all I'm saying.
"President Flightsuit" is habitually a failure---yet people act
flabbergasted, flabbergasted, I tells ya!, that he failed
them again. Yet, what do people want? They want to rebuild in the
same goddamned place, on everyone else's dime---and when the next
hurricane comes, they'll be in the same boat (or, they'll wish they
were in a boat). Me, I live in a rather mild area of the country,
but if a storm destroyed my neighborhood, I surely wouldn't come
steal money from you at gunpoint to rebuild it.
The government deserves heapings of blame, but that's not to say
that some blame doesn't rest on the people who were foolish enough
to live in a sinkhole, below sea level, in the swamps, in hurricane
alley...yet who simply assumed that Uncle Dubya would come down and
save them. The fact that they're poor is a sad fact, but it doesn't
mean that they're immune from criticism, Joe.
What has happened down here is the wind have changed
Clouds roll in from the north and it started to rain
Rained real hard and rained for a real long time
Six feet of water in the streets of Evangeline
The river rose all day
The river rose all night
Some people got lost in the flood
Some people got away alright
The river have busted through clear down to Plaquemines
Six feet of water in the streets of Evangelne
Louisiana, Louisiana
They're tyrin' to wash us away
They're tryin' to wash us away
Louisiana, Louisiana
They're tryin' to wash us away
They're tryin' to wash us away
President Coolidge came down in a railroad train
With a little fat man with a note-pad in his hand
The President say, "Little fat man isn't it a shame what the river
has done
To this poor crackers land."
-Randy Newman, Louisiana 1927.
joe:
All my peeps come from Wilkes-Barre, PA. It is a coal mining town.
It also is built in a flood plain.
There are floods there all the time. The "lower" parts of the town
are obviously hit the hardest. But there was a "big" one back in
the late 60s, early 70s (stupid me, I don't exactly know). Pretty
much everyone lost their houses. And these are working-class
people.
But the one big difference between this and NO is the fucking
WHINING. I don't have any recollections at all about the people in
W-B whining about their plight. A few weeks ago, a bunch of NO
refugees were marching in DC, and chanting "Where is the money!?
Where is the money?!"
Again, I don't remember my grandparents and other family members
having luxury hotel rooms for 6 plus months, and thousands of
dollars in cash given to them. What they did was take all their
rotted possessions and threw them down into the mines. Some people
moved up the mountain, some left town for good, and others
stayed.
My one exception is the people who died in NO and their family
members. Obviously, their suffering is not to be dismissed by any
ideology.
And what's with the "President Flightsuit" crack? Tell me where you
see anyone here going to bat for Bush.
Let ME take a swipe at Bushie.
Just the other day the clown is harassing Congress of being "too
slow" in the great NO payout. No matter which side you're looking
from, the guy is acting like a total jackass (ironic).
Both the left AND right hate the guy now. I can't imagine someone
TRYING and screwing up this badly. Unbelievable. This guy will go
down in history as the most arrogant with the least amount of
substance and ability to back it up.
For the record, I didn't vote for him. I consider this to be
boasting.
I'm giving you a job to do and I'm not leaving here until
it's done.
Is this a modified flat plate theory? 'It's micro-managers all the
way down.' I've seen these guys, they work for DPW and there are
usually 7 trucks parked at one place with 13 people jaw-jacking and
1 guy digging.
"The fact that they're poor is a sad fact, but it doesn't mean
that they're immune from criticism, Joe."
The fact that they're poor means that your supposition that they
have plenty of available choices and the resources to relocate is
unsupported.
"Lost their houses" in Wilkes-Barre (a town that needs to just give
in and become "Wilkesbury"), did they? That's rough. But at least
people who lost their houses, however low their incomes, received
insurance. Maybe, just maybe, that check from the Good Hands People
(the FEMA of the non-undeclass) has something to do with the
difference in the level of "whining."
"The fact that they're poor means that your supposition that
they have plenty of available choices and the resources to relocate
is unsupported."
Really? How did human beings migrate and move from place to place
before the invention of the middle and upper classes? We have poor
people here in Charlottesville, too, Joe. Poor people can be poor
almost anywhere---and rich people can be rich almost anywhere. You
don't have to be wealthy in order to pick up and move to Des
Moines. To the contrary, one would think that if one was poor, then
it would be easier to put your life back together (to
pre-catastrophe levels) elsewhere than it would for one who used to
be wealthy. I can be considered middle-class; I own a house, I have
a good job. If disaster struck, it would be more difficult for me
to relocate and get a similar job and own a similar house in
another place, than it would for someone who works at McDonalds. I
hear about these refugees who are still living in motels in other
cities, still with no jobs, 6 months later. How is that
possible?
Our society is the most advanced and wealthy society to ever walk
the earth; our poor class has less options relative to the wealthy,
but relative to, say, the wealthy of 100 years ago, they have many
more. I'd rather be poor in 2006 than middle-class in 1906. Yet, my
argument that they have the option to leave is "unsupported",
simply because they don't have as many options as the
wealthy? That's horseshit.
the Good Hands People (the FEMA of the
non-undeclass)
Right, because Allstate takes money from everybody and gives it to
those who never paid into the system. Just like apartments are
Public Housing for the non-underclass.
joe:
Our exchange has sparked my curiousity of how much assistance my
family got during the big flood many years ago (WilkesBury,
Wilke-BARR, Wilkes-BERR, even the townies switch it up). Yes, FEMA
was there. And I wonder if they were every bit as incompetant with
the hand-outs as they are today.
And are you saying that the folks in NO didn't get any federal
assistance for their lost homes? There weren't FEMA field offices
handing out checks like candy? Obviously, there is a "timeliness"
gripe in this particular event. But the big-cash giveaway after
hurricanes, floods, volcanos, is standard procedure.
NO was a dying city before the hurricane--I'd say that many of
the poor folks who ended up in Houston would be better off staying
there if they want to build new lives. And if they want to suck off
the welfare teat, well you can do that any number of places--no
need to build new crappy public housing in NO to replace the old
crappy public housing.
I've read accounts where other parts of the Gulf Coast are quite
busy rebuilding. Many of the sob stories from other parts of the GC
seem to involve people having protracted disputes with their
insurers. I'm no fan of GWB, but I don't see how that's his
fault.
Actually, Faith Hill put the blame on Lousiana political corruption. I heard the audio on the radio this morning. I've googled, but can't find the audio or a transcript. Every article I have read about it makes it into yet another Bush bashing.
joe, what did you do to help them? Ahh - vote
to raise my taxes? Gee thanks man. How noble. Open up your fucking
wallet if you think the "poor" deserve more of "our" money.
"A flood of words, a drop of reason."
I'm really not interested in discussing my charitable giving
with the likes of you.
I do like the way you assumed that I must be hypocritical, cheap,
and irresponsible because I disagree with you in a political
debate, though.
That's classy and intelligent.
Woody Allen? Allentown, PA? Pa Smurf? Smurfette? Feta Cheese? Cheese Louise? Louie Louie?
Mr. Nice Guy: One big difference between New Orleans and Wilkes
Barre is that Wilkes Barre is much, much smaller.
I'm not surprised if Wilkes Barre's people were better able to cope
than 10 times as many people from New Orleans.
Also, the flooded area of W-B was surrounded closely by unaffected
areas from which help and economic activity could come.
And I'm sure the W-B flood receded far sooner than the weeks it
took to drain parts of New Orleans, meaning that W-B's structures
took less damage.
"Actually, Faith Hill put the blame on Lousiana political
corruption."
And her husband was clearly talking about the President.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245