Jesse Walker | May 19, 2005
In Technology Review, Lawrence Lessig and Richard Epstein are debating intellectual property, free software, and digital rights management.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
This is just one essay. After about five minutes of trying to figure out where the rest of the debate is, I gave up. For a technology magazine, these folks sure do have piss-poor navigation on their site.
SP: There's three links in my post, each going to a different essay.
Sandy,
The "freedom" to be required to put my changes back into the
commons?
Only if you wish to distribute the work you derived from already
GnuGPL-covered code. If you don't like those terms, don't derive
work from GnuGPL-covered code. It's copyrighted, not patented, so
it shouldn't be too hard coming up with your own implementation,
maybe even by translating the algorithm to another computer
language. Because you can look at the code, it may even be able to
give you ideas that you wouldn't have with proprietary
solutions.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245