Jacob Sullum | December 12, 2002
A New Jersey judge ruled yesterday that the state's civil forfeiture system violates the right to due process. Superior Court Judge G. Thomas Bowen agreed with the Institute for Justice that funding police and prosecutors with the proceeds from forfeitures creates an unconstitutional bias, giving them an incentive to target assets rather than criminals. I.J. represents a former police officer who lost her car after her son used it to sell pot.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|12.12.02 @ 11:06AM|#
Finally, someone read the constitution with their breakfast. When I complained once about this practice, a nice young prosecutor from Sacramento said "Of course we never use forfeiture against innocent people."
|12.12.02 @ 11:32AM|#
Our(NJ) Supreme Court, who've never met a prosecutor they didn't like, will overturn it.
bigbooty.ws|7.15.11 @ 9:06AM|#
the title "booty call" dont make sense really lol