Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Election 2016

Economic Myths of the Presidential Candidates

Politicians are mythmakers.

John Stossel | 1.20.2016 12:01 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hillary Clinton: "Of course we want to raise the minimum wage!"

Donald Trump: If we trade with China, "they suck us dry … take everything. We get nothing!"

Bernie Sanders: "Ordinary Americans are working longer hours for lower wages."

But it's not true! Politicians are so ignorant about economics.

On his blog, Cafe Hayek, George Mason University professor Donald Boudreaux says his main job is showing students that much of what they believe about economics is wrong. I wish he taught presidential candidates.

Sen. Sanders simply gets facts wrong. Today Americans work fewer hours—down from about 2,000 hours per year to 1,800 over the past 60 years—and earn more. It's true that the rich got even richer, but the poor and middle class have done better, too, with about 40 percent higher salaries for the middle class and 48 percent more for the poor over the past 35 years. Politicians lie.

Donald Trump doesn't understand trade. Even if China "dumps" goods on America, we don't "get nothing"—we get the goods. As Trevor Woolley posted on my Facebook page, "The fact that the free market is based on consensual transaction means that no trade can decrease anyone's wellbeing."

Right. Since trade is voluntary, no trade happens unless both sides think they will gain. Trade may eliminate jobs in some industries, but it creates jobs elsewhere, more jobs, and creates wealth for the vast majority.

Helping some American companies by restricting foreign imports, as Donald Trump vows to do, sounds nice, but you can't restrict goods available to American consumers without reducing competition. Protected from competition, companies get lazier, less productive. They innovate less. Prices rise.

Hillary Clinton's minimum wage will help some workers, but overall, it should be obvious it's a job kille. If a minimum really could increase wages without harm, why are politicians so cheap? Let's have a $1,000 minimum wage! But it's just basic economics: If you increase the price of something, people buy less of it. That applies to workers hired, not just goods.

More myths:

  • Prices and wages are simply "set" by businesses.
  • The rich get richer at the expense of the poor.
  • Price increases after natural disasters are caused by "greed" and should be stopped by laws against "gouging."
  • Rent control makes housing affordable.
  • Business taxes are paid by business.
  • Supporters of free markets are "pro-business" and (hence) "anti-consumer."

These are simple notions about economics into which our brains lazily fall. But none is true.
For example, supporters of free markets (like me) don't necessarily support business. I won 19 Emmy awards criticizing businesses. Corporations can be enemies of free markets because they don't want competition. They routinely lobby politicians to squelch it.

Boudreaux says his students arrive on the first day of class thinking businesses just "set" prices and wages. But businesses can't do that. Companies lose customers if they price goods higher than competitors do.

Wages can't be set at will either. Sure, what boss wouldn't like to pay a workforce one dollar per year? But other companies need laborers too, and those that underpay lose good workers. So the bidding process continues endlessly—it's why the median household income in the U.S. is more than $50,000 a year. That wouldn't happen if bosses could just wake up and decide, "Let's pay workers less!"

The credit for good wages doesn't go to labor unions or politicians' passing a minimum wage, though they sure hog the credit. The credit goes to market competition and a growing economy. After all, 95 percent of workers earn more than minimum wage, and most jobs aren't unionized.

Politicians can't see the wonders that the market provides, but they somehow see everything government does as a blessing—taxes that cut into people's pay and regulations that make it more expensive to produce. They don't see that their well-intended "pro-consumer" rules raise prices and reduce choice.

I wish more Americans learned basic economics from economists like Boudreaux—or from me! At StosselintheClassroom.org, I offer teachers free videos that illustrate economic principles and debunk myths like the ones listed above.

Politicians, on the other hand, are lousy teachers.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: BBC Journalist Prevented From Traveling to US Because of New Visa Waiver Rules

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

Election 2016Economics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (54)

Latest

Newly Released Documents Show What the Feds Knew About the New Jersey Drone Scare

Matthew Petti | 5.9.2025 12:31 PM

New York's Biggest Budget Doubles Down on the Mistakes Driving People Out

Gregory Lyakhov | 5.9.2025 12:15 PM

Trump Is Wrong. Cheap Goods Are Awesome.

Emma Camp | 5.9.2025 11:15 AM

Bernie Sanders: American Success Story

Liz Wolfe | 5.9.2025 9:41 AM

The EPA Is a Prime Candidate for Reform by the Trump Administration

J.D. Tuccille | 5.9.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!