Conservatives Cope with Electoral Defeat by Seceding from Reality

Secession isn’t the answer to last week’s defeat at the ballot box.

Psychiatrists talk about the various stages of grief that people experience after suffering a devastating loss in their personal lives, ranging from denial to anger to bargaining (i.e., trying to strike a “deal” with a higher power) to depression to, finally, acceptance.

Political scientists ought to come up with a similar series of “grief stages” for those people who try to grapple with devastating political losses. Republicans, who were convinced that voters would grant them the White House after four years of failed Obama administration policies, are trying to deal with their recent grief.

Discouraged political activists have been expressing denial, anger, and depression. Currently, they are going through a stage that should be termed “fantasy” by advocating ideas that will never come to fruition, pretending that there’s a quick, fun solution to deep political problems that will only be solved over time and through hard work and vision.

For instance, more than 675,000 Americans in every state have filed online petitions with the White House calling for the secession of their respective states from the union. The Obama administration had created the “We the People” online petition system to encourage the public to more directly participate in the nation’s governance by suggesting ideas that the administration should pursue.

Any petition that hits the 25,000 signature threshold prompts a “review” by the White House. As the Daily Caller reported, “Launched Nov. 7, the day after Obama won re-election, the Pelican State’s spark set off an Internet-driven cascade of disaffected tea partiers and other conservatives looking—as one petition organizer told The Daily Caller via a ‘direct message’ on Twitter—‘just to do something, anything, to show we’re not going away quietly.’”

This certainly fits the “just do something” parameters, but the Obama administration will no doubt provide some three-minute review of the petitions and issue a bland statement calling for the continued unification of our country. This secession movement is typical, perhaps, in a world where people are fixated on Facebook and Twitter.

There’s nothing unserious about secession, despite the idea having been sullied by the unpleasantness of the mid-1800s. It’s the ultimate check and balance on an out-of-control central government, but powerful nations rarely let the unruly provinces break away without bloody battles. This idea, a temper-tantrum really, is not going to happen in a country where, despite the temporary frustration, people still happily spend their weekends at the shopping malls.

One opinion writer argued that Texas could pull this off. Of course, it could, technically speaking. But it won’t happen because the federal government owns more and bigger guns even than Texans. States are diverse and complex places. Even in Texas, Obama received more than 41 percent of the vote. In California, which went for Obama by a stunning 59 percent to 39 percent margin, most counties went for Mitt Romney. It would be hard to disentangle our nation based simply on state boundaries—despite the simplistic Blue State vs. Red State breakdown that has been so common among media analysts.

A number of people happy with the election results have filed their own online petitions at the White House calling for the petitioners to be deported, and the Texas governor dismissed the idea despite his differences with the feds. The idea, then, would be widely opposed even in places where the idea might sprout.

For those of us living in California, secession would mean something even worse than we have now, given that our leaders are much further to the left than elsewhere. For example, the new cap-and-trade system, the first (and, let’s hope, last) in the nation, got started recently with an auction of government-issued greenhouse-gas “allowances” that even the Air Resources Board admits will lead to significant “leakages” (i.e., job losses). The folks who crafted this system would have even more power outside of the union.

The better idea for frustrated Californians (aside from seeking a new home in Oklahoma City or Abilene), is to reconsider the old notion of breaking our state into more hospitable parts. Consider that relatively small Sacramento County has a land area not that much smaller, and a population about 50 percent larger, than Rhode Island. San Bernardino County is larger, geographically, than nine states. Who says that California, which spans nearly 800 miles north to south, needs to stay in its current configuration?

I’d create three California states. The first would run from Los Angeles County through Sonoma County. In Coastal California, there would be few things to hinder the liberal experimentation popular in places such as San Francisco, Santa Cruz, and Los Angeles. Those living outside this state would presumably be free to visit on weekends and enjoy the cultural amenities, but wouldn’t have to pay for the nuttiness.

The second state would be Southern California, including Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial counties. This area would be politically competitive, but conservative leaning. So, too, would be the final state of Inland California, which would include most of the vast Central Valley and the Sierras. I would throw the North State counties into the already-proposed State of Jefferson—reflecting an old-time secessionist movement that would combine northern California and southern Oregon counties, a collection of mountainous areas with little population and a distinct culture.

There would be more harmony, and fewer complaints by people of the left and right who could then live under political leadership that better reflects their values and priorities.

It’s a fun thought experiment, an act of silliness that can help forlorn conservative-minded California voters cope with a grievous political situation. But, sooner or later, we need to move on from fantasy and accept the world as it exists so that we can pursue serious ideas to save our state from the abyss.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Loki||

    deep political problems that will only be solved over time and through hard work and vision.

    ...and given our current government, what are the odds of that happening?

  • Rich||

    Why, *certainty*, Loki.

    We'll just *deem* certain things to be "hard work and vision".

  • FD||

    "There would be more harmony, and fewer complaints by people of the left and right who _could then live under political leadership_ that better reflects their values and priorities." Emphasis my own.

    Well, at least you got the oligarchical configuration described properly for underlings who await their masters. Bend over accordingly.

  • CE||

    But it won’t happen because the federal government owns more and bigger guns even than Texans.

    This isn't the nineteenth century. The enlightened US government wouldn't launch a military invasion of a state that voted to secede, would it? Would it?

  • FD||

    Well said.
    To imagine the firepower the Feds would use, just consider kooky Randy Weaver. Extrapolate from "size of family" to "size of State".

  • Steve Buckstein||

    An invasion? No. Drone streikes are another matter.

  • CE||

    But, sooner or later, we need to move on from fantasy and accept the world as it exists so that we can pursue serious ideas to save our state from the abyss.

    If everyone accepted the world as it existed, we'd still live in caves and hunt with spears and tell stories about the mammoth that got away.

    Here's a serious proposal: put California's secession from the US on a ballot measure to California voters. What percent would vote yes?

  • FD||

    On a roll. Another excellent point.
    And this underscores the Orwellian mentality of Washington DC. Never mind that some states have constitutions retaining right of secession. Of course the Feds will contort and misread, as they always do, the supremacy clause. And never mind that a pro-secession vote would garner about as much as the Libertarians received last week. ostensibly giving DC no cause worry, it doesn't matter.
    Big Brother is so pervasively ruthless, they are saying this: “You bastards ain’t even gonna THINK about this, you understand? I don’t care if it’s one percent or one freaking person out there. Don’t you even let it cross your mind because we will crush you before you can even count the ballots.” Now tell me, leftist and rightist Beltway power apoligists, who's really the more paranoid? The secessionist who wishes to be left alone and to his wish to a vote, or the Unites States armed forces who would quell this discussion before it was even whispered in the neighborhoods?

  • Matt N||

    1500 character limit?

    That's only 10 tweets worth... Is reason trying to gaurantee that nothing interesting is said?

    whatever

  • Robert Jordan||

    No fantasy there.

    Signing an online petition is, of course, simply a symbolic act of no importance whatsoever. But secession is entirely legally and entirely possible, though it will be more achievable later than sooner.

    In any case, this country is headed to inevitable economic collapse - and well within even the Baby Boomers' lifetimes. (Kind of suiting, that last part.)

    As the situation deteriorates, and in particular, as those who rely on government for subsidy find the well gone dry, secession will become not only a more attractive option, but also a sort of inevitable direction of flow.

  • nikea||

    Forty-one percent of Johnson voters self-identify as http://www.cheapfootballcleatsairs.com/ libertarian. Only 14 percent self-identify as conservative and 10 percent self-identify as liberal. Using the Reason-Rupe ideological typology, 65 percent of Johnson voters are libertarian, the remainder is liberal or http://www.nikefootballcleatstrade.com/ conservative, and none are communitarian.

  • nikea||

    San Bernardino County is larger, geographically, than nine states. Who says that California, which spans nearly 800 miles north to http://www.cheapbeatsbydreonau.com/ south, needs to stay in its current configuration?

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement