Brian Doherty from the August-September 2010 issue
The Department of Homeland Security seems to believe that national security requires the government to seize photographers’ memory cards on public streets. A federal lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) in April may change their minds.
The plaintiff is Antonio Musumeci, a New Jersey software programmer and blogger who on November 9, 2009, filmed the arrest of an activist advocating jury nullification in a public plaza outside a federal courthouse in Manhattan. Musumeci was then arrested, detained, and ticketed, and an employee of the Federal Protective Service (a sub-agency of Homeland Security) confiscated Musumeci’s memory card.
Musumeci was arrested under a law that restricts photography on federal property. But the law explicitly allows photography in “building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.” The statute also says public warning must be posted on federal property where photography is prohibited, which was not the case in the plaza where Musumeci was arrested. As the NYCLU notes, photography restrictions are applied inconsistently in different areas outside federal courthouses.
The charge against Musumeci was dismissed in March. Musumeci is taking the government to court to seek “declaratory and injunctive relief that will allow him to film and take photographs in public areas outside federal buildings where pedestrians have unrestricted access, as well as compensatory damages for his unlawful arrest.”
Donna Lieberman, executive director of the NYCLU, told the New York Daily News she hopes the case establishes that “people have a clear right to use cameras in public places without being hassled and arrested by federal agents or police.”
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Scarf|8.21.10 @ 10:29PM|#
fendi scarf,fendi scarf has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
fendi scarf had expanded our line from fendi scarfs to a wider range.
They are fendi scarf,fendi scarf.fendi scarf:do you want to buy it?
Scarf|8.21.10 @ 10:29PM|#
fendi scarf,fendi scarf has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
fendi scarf had expanded our line from fendi scarfs to a wider range.
They are fendi scarf,fendi scarf.fendi scarf:do you want to buy it?
ouyang|9.4.10 @ 4:23AM|#
Thank you for the great web site - a true resource, and one many people clearly enjoy thanks for sharing the info, keep up the good work going....
nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 9:57PM|#
fdfd
Scarpe Nike|8.3.11 @ 9:26PM|#
is good
Jordan Shoes|8.12.11 @ 10:19PM|#
so perfect.