Brian Doherty from the August-September 2010 issue
Apple Computers has dinged its fragile reputation as the cooler, less uptight computer giant by throwing the full weight of the law (and perhaps more than that) against a website that revealed some secrets of the next iPhone.
A hapless Apple employee accidentally left an iPhone prototype at a Redwood City, California, bar in March. The man who found it sold it to Gizmodo, a Gawker-owned site that covers the computer industry, for $5,000. Gizmodo Editor Jason Chen wrote about the phone in detail, earning more than 4 million views for the scoop.
Within a week, San Mateo County police and members of the Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team—a local, state, and federal task force on whose steering committee Apple serves —broke into Chen’s house with a wide-ranging warrant. While Chen and his wife were out, the police seized two MacBooks, his iPhone, a desktop computer, and hard drives. Chen, who arrived home during the raid, has not been charged with a crime.
Gawker argues that the search and seizure violated California’s legal protection for journalists’ sources and unpublished information. The search may also have violated the federal Privacy Protection Act of 1980, which bars seizure of certain journalistic work products. Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Jennifer Grannick sums up the relevant case law this way: “While a court may conclude that under particular facts and circumstances a reporter must divulge sources or unpublished materials, or that he is liable for his misdeeds, police may not decide on their own to ignore free speech protections for journalists merely by claiming that the reporter may have committed a crime.”
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Scarf|8.21.10 @ 10:31PM|#
fendi scarf,fendi scarf has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
fendi scarf had expanded our line from fendi scarfs to a wider range.
They are fendi scarf,fendi scarf.fendi scarf:do you want to buy it?
Scarf|8.21.10 @ 10:32PM|#
Gucci Wool Shawl,Gucci Wool Shawl has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
Gucci Wool Shawl had expanded our line from Gucci Wool Shawl to a wider range.
They are Gucci Wool Shawl,Gucci Wool Shawl.Gucci Wool Shawl:do you want to buy it?
Scarf|8.21.10 @ 10:34PM|#
burberry scarf,burberry scarf has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
burberry scarf had expanded our line from burberry scarf to a wider range.
They are burberry scarf,burberry scarf.burberry scarf:do you want to buy it?
ouyang|9.4.10 @ 4:25AM|#
I like this article. I find the information I need. I think I can find more useful information here, thanks. http://www.mbt-shoescom.com
nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 9:57PM|#
we
Scarpe Nike|8.3.11 @ 9:30PM|#
is good
Jordan Shoes|8.12.11 @ 10:20PM|#
so perfect.
قبلة الوداع|8.16.11 @ 10:09PM|#
thank u