Kerry Howley from the March 2008 issue
Wikipedia’s
detractors criticize the online, user-written, constantly changing
encyclopedia’s sometimes dubious sourcing, which they say makes it
unreliable. Wikipedia’s defenders counter that the site’s mutable,
fluid nature engenders a valuable skepticism toward all manner of
too-trusted authorities. Nothing conveys Wikipedia’s openness to
revision quite like “[citation needed],” the bracketed phrase
sprinkled throughout its pixellated scrolls.
Now some sourcing enthusiasts have liberated the “[citation needed]” tag from its cyber origins. Blogger Matt Mechtley began by printing up 250 stickers and handing them out to friends. Irked, perhaps, by the lack of fact-checking rigor on billboards and bathroom stalls, they have splashed the stickers across advertisements and noncommercial public pronouncements. “In true wiki fashion,” Mechtley writes, “the final placement of the stickers is a collaborative effort, now distributed and anonymous.”
The caveat lector guerrilla campaign is chronicled online, where the dubious claims of cell phone marketers and placard-wielding politicians are treated with equal suspicion. You can check this article’s sourcing, and print up some citation-hungry stickers for yourself, at Mechtley’s blog, biphenyl.org.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
We'd have to slap these stickers on the foreheads of Obama, Clinton, and McCain to have any real impact. Actually, over their mouths would be better.
Yeah, this is a great idea...another cool idea would be to add this tag to videos of politicians speaking...like a YouTube remix of, say, Bush's state of the union or one of the Democrats' NAFTA bashing.
nice. the guy has a couple of other fun little things on his
blog: http://biphenyl.org/blog/
i like the breathalyzer-pong hack. the best ideas are simple ones
:-)
Am I supposed to print up another sticker with the citation on it when I find it, and put it underneath? I don't get it.
Kerry, aren't you going to announce your appearance on "Red Eye" tonight?
I love it! I can't count the times when people say things,
especially at blogs, without any proof what so ever. I just want to
scream, WHERE DID YOU GET THAT! I love Wiki.
And Russ; as to Clinton, Obama, and McCain, please remember that
most of what they are promising is under the control of our 634
members of Congress. If you buy into the idea that the country is
in trouble [citation needed] then you have to vote for Obama. He is
the least to blame. On the other hand if you believe, like I do,
that the country and the world is better off today than it has ever
been before then vote for McCain. Citations; GNP up, Stocks pretty
good, race and gender-just look at the candidates, no recession,
winning the war. Shall I go on?
"Inflation is everywhere and always a monetary phenomenon, in
the sense that it cannot occur without a more rapid increase in the
quantity of money than in output." --Milton Friedman, Encyclopedia
Britannica article on "Money"
See this
UK Telegraph article.
On the other hand, speaking before the Senate Banking Committee on
Feb 28, Fed Chief "Bernanke told lawmakers the Fed anticipates
inflation will slow, in part because of "sluggish'' economic growth
and rising unemployment."
Hey Ben: [citation needed]
(I remember the 1970s.)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245