Donna Ladd | October 22, 2007
Last September, my newspaper reported that on August 26, 2006, Jackson, Mississippi Mayor Frank Melton had taken an entourage of police officers and teenagers (some with criminal records) to a duplex in a poor neighborhood. Stating that the duplex was home to drug dealers, Mayor Melton then directed the odd mix of cops and teenagers to destroy the house with sledgehammers.
Strange as it may seem, none of this surprised us.
This is just our mayor—“Frank,” as the former television executive and ousted director of the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics insists that everyone call him. Most people, including a doting mainstream media, do.
Even before he was elected mayor, Frank Melton was known around Jackson as a loose cannon with little regard for civil liberties or the U.S. Constitution. He was adept at saying what people want to hear. The African American TV executive from Texas defeated the capital city’s first black mayor in 2005 by absurdly promising to rid the city of crime and “thugs” (clearly referring to the black variety) within 90 days of taking office (yes, we still have crime). Former Mayor Harvey Johnson Jr., the man Melton defeated, was quieter, more methodical, and more focused on issues like development and infrastructure, and balancing the city’s budget. He sat back and allowed a professional police chief do the job of crime fighting—and presided over a steady drop in crime over his eight-year tenure.
In his campaign, Melton claimed that Johnson's administration doctored the crime statistics, but offered little in the way of evidence. It didn’t matter. Melton won the Democratic primary with 63 percent of the vote.
Since he came to Jackson from Tyler, Texas, to run WLBT-TV in 1984—leaving his wife and biological children behind—Melton had constructed a persona for himself as a tough-on-crime folk hero. He bought billboards where he plastered mugshots of accused drug dealers. Once a week, he’d end his TV station’s newscast with a “Bottom Line” rant, often focusing his ire on some public official who had challenged his vigilantism and do-it-yourself justice system (Melton, for example, has often allowed young men wanted for serious crimes to turn themselves in to him and stay at his home rather than bring them to the police).
Going all Buford Pusser on an occupied duplex might have been extreme, but it’s par for the course for Mayor Melton, whom no one will ever accuse of lacking for a sense of drama. Among our mayor’s greatest hits:
• He once stopped a school bus on a busy interstate because he “needed a hug” from the kids inside.
• He’s been known to strap weapons to his chest and leg that he has no authority to carry or conceal, then wear them in public.
• He regularly suits up and leads SWAT-style “raids” on homes, businesses, and even roadblocks in busy traffic—without cause or a warrant.
• He has tried to close down the city’s strip clubs for moral reasons, despite no authority to do so.
• He once bulldozed an elderly woman’s house, promising to build her a better one. He then forgot to build it.
• He recruited a team of kids to torch a row of dilapidated shotgun houses, without clearance or first turning off the utilities.
• He keeps a house full of young men, including minors and/or felons, without having the proper foster-parent credentials.
• He once hid two of those young men wanted for armed robbery from the district attorney and county sheriff, driving away with one of them in his car after deputies stopped them and tried to serve a warrant on the young man (who later assisted with the duplex demolition).
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Umm, every link from this article was a 404 error. Could an admin look into this? Thanks!
Taktix -- the vacation is safe. You'll be at least 700 miles away in Jackson, Michigan.
Taktix,
Did you miss the part about no drug dealing arrests by the city
police for all of 2006?
I almost can't believe that statement unless the Hinds County
sheriffs or the state does all the drug enforcement.
Jackson MS is a neat place to visit though.
Interesting article, but the links are all messed up. Would like to read more. Can ya fix em?
Oddly enough, under Melton's leadership the Jackson Police
Department didn't arrest a single person for selling drugs in 2006.
So while Melton basks in the glory of his own extra-legal
vigilantism, he really isn't doing much to fight the drug war by
legal means
Oh, this is an easy one.
"But for Mayor Melton's activities, drug dealing and use would be
through the roof."
But seriously, is it just me, or does anyone get the idea that at
some point, Mr. Melton will be driving through the streets of
Jackson in a "technical" with a small gang of...armed youths riding
in the back?
Sorry...
Jackson, Miss.
Is that better? I knew I should have never deviated from AP style,
no matter how arbitrary it is...
Donna, I'd stay out of Jackson, if I were you.
Looks like the mayor has organized the criminal element and his
mansion is the headquarters.
I wonder how long before he dresses them in brownshirts?
Sorry, there was an HTML error that turned all the links into junk code. Fixed now.
FWIW, Donna Ladd is the editor of a left-leaning news-weekly in
Jackson. Her criticisms of Mayor Melton aren't without merit, but
her characterization of Harvey Johnson lacks, shall we say,
context.
Harvey Johnson's administration was characterized as the guy who
brought state and federal government money into the city to build
stuff. (Such as a multi-modal train/bus station that is very fancy
and practically empty and unused. Buses rarely have more than a
half-dozen passengers.) Crime was a serious problem, to the extent
that downtown Jackson becomes a ghost town at night. Without the
state and city government offices, and the small businesses that
cater to them, downtown would be deserted during the day, too.
Taxes are high, services desultory, and businesses and the
middle-class fled to the suburbs.
I say none of this to defend Mayor Melton. I only want to explain
that the problems in Jackson run a lot deeper than who sits in City
Hall. As absurd and dangerous as Mayor Melton is, at least when he
leaves office there won't be too many unaffordable new boondoggles
or bonds to service.
This is the type of mayor that they try to make TV dramas
about.
Yeah, "The Shield" meets "Mien Kampf"
Oddly enough, under Melton's leadership the Jackson Police
Department didn't arrest a single person for selling drugs in
2006.
So, is the reason staff moving there to vote? Sounds like
the perfect guy for Mr. Balko to endorse!
I am not far behind, but I need to know more about the police
attitude toward reasonable vehicle speed, no matter the posted
speed.
rho,
to the extent that downtown Jackson becomes a ghost town at
night
Upside: No problem getting a free parking space!
"the Olympic-sized swimming pool in the basement underneath
it-a pool where Melton has for years brought boys from the inner
city to teach them to swim."
Hmm.
Guy,
The streets of downtown Jackson are one big expedient speed bump.I
find the decrepit "preservation" of neglect and decay to be
charming.Jackson has wonderful deco/modernist architecture they
forgot to tear down in the 1970s.
I feel a lot less ashamed about the fact that my county elects Joe Arpaio after reading that. Wow.
But seriously, is it just me, or does anyone get the idea
that at some point, Mr. Melton will be driving through the streets
of Jackson in a "technical" with a small gang of...armed youths
riding in the back?
Sounds like that's pretty much what he's doing now. Holy
crap.
Sounds like a mash-up of Marion Barry and Robert Mugabe.
If the people of that city are gonna put someone like this guy in charge, the state should revoke its charter.
(Melton's bed)room was exactly the same size as the Olympic-sized swimming pool in the basement underneath it
Is this right? That would mean his bedroom is over 11,000 square
feet! How big is his house?!
It's stuff like this that makes it hard for me to determine the
difference between facts and literary embellishment.
Is there a current Mrs Melton or is it just him and a bunch of young men and boys?
This has to be my favorite comment ever about one of my
pieces:
Donna -- welcome aboard. Loved you in Charlie's
Angels.
I SO wanted to be a Charlie's Angel. People still get confused and
called me Cheryl. I don't mind.
A couple factual clarifications: My ride-alongs with Melton were in
April 2006. As for drug arrests, the city did not REPORT a single
drug-distribution arrest in 2006; I can't say absolutely for
certain that they didn't make any. I've been told that any
drug-sales arrests that were made last year were in conjunction
with other agencies.
As for the pool, it is a big-ass pool and a huge
bedroom/office/meeting space. Melton calls the pool Olympic-sized,
and it is the exact size of his bedroom above. I haven't measured
it myself, though.
Melton's wife, Dr. Ellen Melton, is a pediatrician in Tyler, Texas,
where she lives. His two biological children grew up there.
Oh, and the postal abbreviation for Mississippi is MS. Don't
feel bad: Everybody screws it up.
Let me know if anyone has other factual questions.
Melton invited me into his bedroom as he finished preparing
for the raid. This room was huge ... exactly the same size as the
Olympic-sized swimming pool in the basement underneath it-a pool
where Melton has for years brought boys from the inner city to
teach them to swim.
Um, are any of these inner city boys ever seen again? Or do they
end up in the lime pit that's underneath the bathroom?
Melton invited me into his bedroom as he finished preparing
for the raid. This room was huge ... exactly the same size as the
Olympic-sized swimming pool in the basement underneath it-a pool
where Melton has for years brought boys from the inner city to
teach them to swim.
Now THAT sounds like a line from a crime novel.
Oh, and the postal abbreviation for Mississippi is MS. Don't
feel bad: Everybody screws it up.
Donna,
Not everyone. See my 3:57 comment.
Jackson is a great town despite the Mayor.
The thing with the boys is...more than a bit creepy.
Let me see, most olympic sized pools are 50 meters by 25 years...or
one huge room once you factor in the pool deck, like say 16,000
square feet. Was it so big you had trouble seeing the bed?
Dear Jackson Resident,
OK, You probably won't get a saint or a genuine hero to be your
mayor. Shoouln't you at least demand an adult?
Just Asking,
J sub D
Worst mayor in America? That's saying a lot.
If there had actually been no arrests for drug-dealing in his city
in 2006, that would make him the best mayor in the country.
We know that can't be true. If it were, Jackson would have a lot
less crime.
"Donna, I'd stay out of Jackson, if I were you."
We'll protect her.
Great article Donna.
I was going to make a joke about how this could only happen because Sharpe James didn't run for re-election, but even he'd have to concede this title.
At this point asking Donna Ladd to write yet another story about Frank Melton is akin to asking Bob Novak to write one more about Plame and Wilson. In both cases one should seriously question the writer's perspective but, more importantly, the need.
This guy's life would make an excellent TV show, sort of half way between a Crime Drama and a Sitcom, where you are never sure one way or the other.
This is why I ignore the "violence never solved anything"
dweebs.
A bullet to this guy's head would end most of the BS instantly.
I think the problem here is that the Mayor, like many people,
refers to any pool that's 25 yards long and has more than 2 lanes
as "Olympic sized."
Like Steve says above, a truly Olympic sized pool is frikin' huge,
and I don't think even John Edwards has one indoors.
If there had actually been no arrests for drug-dealing in
his city in 2006, that would make him the best mayor in the
country.
No drug arrests vs. basically a junta in the U.S.? Yeah, I don't
think it's worth it so much.
I hear they don't "arrest" a lot of people in North Korea,
either...
"Donna, I'd stay out of Jackson, if I were you."
No worries, she probably does. Jackson may be fucked up beyond
redemption (bring on the 'dozers!), but those with a modicum of
self-respect live and work in the suburbs, like Flowood, Pearl,
Brandon, Madison...
...curious what joe has to say about it.
This is an excellent cautionary tale for those who believe the
Constitutional limits on the powers on an individual executive are
too restrictive.
And- that pool-in-the-basement thing; this guy must have a truly
vast (homemade) gay porn library.
Let me know if anyone has other factual
questions.
Why didnt you shoot that fucker in the head during your ride
along?
What quite a few of you don't understand is that Jackson was a
great place. For those of us that grew up here and still live here,
we want it to return to some sort of semblance of normalcy but
little melton is doing his best to ruin our city - not his but
ours. He is not from here, hell he had to come from TX in order to
find somewhere he felt "wanted". Sadly, some people in Jackson gave
it to him. The problem is that some people have raised him to the
status of "Folk Hero" without questioning any of his motives and
that allowed him to get where he is today.
The Jackson Free Press has done an exceptional job and I applaud
Ms. Ladd and her staff for going through some of the crap they have
in order to report the truth - which for some reason everyone hears
and goes "Wow wacky crime drama on TV - this can't be true!?!" But
folks, it is.
Regarding Harvey Johnson - he might have been a quite man and
appeared ineffectual - but he got a lot stuff rolling, like the
Farish Street District, the King Edward Hotel, the bus/train
station, crime was down because he let the police chief do his job
as opposed to trying to play cow-boys and indians (or in Melton's
case - mentors and thugs). In all Mr. Johnson ran the city like a
manager and got things done but he apparently wasn't in your face
enough for people so they thought he wasn't doing a good job. Since
melton is so in your face people thought he would do a great job
and he made promises that he couldn't, hasn't and never could have
kept.
Regarding why Downtown is appears to be like a ghost town on the
weekends or nights - it has nothing to do with crime. Like most
downtowns across American where there isn't a big residential
population, there just isn't anything to do there on the weekends
unless you want to go cruise law offices. Occasionally we walk our
dogs downtown or go to Hal and Mals or something - we and everyone
I know feel safe. That isn't where the crime is happening.
Point is, Jackson was a great city - I grew up here and then moved
to NYC and SF - but you know what? I moved back. The people here
are wonderful, the area was great and I love my city. Sadly over
the past two years Melton has done more to damage the city than a
bull in a china shop. So until you visit and live here and until
you experience Melton for yourself - don't criticize us and tell us
to leave - we just want our city back, damnit.
The bed is tiny in the bedroom-and was never made up when I was
in there. It also has a red phone on the bed table, which he says
rings when there is a murder (which is more often of late). On one
visit, Melton, the chief, assistant chief and I sat at the table at
one end and talked, while one of his bodyguards chased his dog Abby
back and forth, up and down the room for exercise. (I assume the
bodyguard was being paid overtime at that point, but can't say for
sure.) I think Melton gave me the exact dimensions of both the
bedroom and the pool, but I'll have to comb old notes for it, which
I don't have time to do right now.
I've also reported that his guns lay casually on the dresser in his
bedroom, and his gun holster hung on a coat rack there. He says he
locks his bedroom, but young people seem to come in and out at
will.
I live in the city and love it. I'm not the suburban type, and I've
lived in more crime-prone places than Jackson (like the Lower East
Side of the 1980s). And I should add that, despite Melton's antics,
there are many, many positive things going on in Jackson, including
a vital downtown Renaissance with development money from heroes
like Deuce McAllister.
And don't assume that Jackson is wholeheartedly behind Melton at
this point. He worked for years establishing himself as a folk hero
with no real media coverage, and people bought it. He is *very*
personable and easily draws people in by his charm. Some of us have
force fields, though. I enjoyed time in his presence, but I'm also
not charmed into excusing his actions. I do have compassion for
him, though, and believe he needs help. He also has quite the knack
at saying what different groups want to hear, even if it's
dramatically different, and the media coverage in the past of him
was so bad that most people didn't know how different his message
was to white Republicans and black rap artists.
Judge past support of Melton here as you will. But it is a
different time now (and a different media climate ... finally). We
happen not to have a recall law in the state, so really the only
way to remove him from office is by felony conviction. The feds may
or may not bring that to fruition, but the investigation seems to
be very real. (There was an attempt by the Jackson police to get
the FBI to investigate him and others years ago, but that failed
... and the FBI agent resigned and went to work with him at a local
TV station. But that's another whole story.)
This has been, and is, a vital story here in Jackson-not only about
Melton's actions, but about an electorate that so easily bought his
promises. My goal is not to judge that, but to use real and
specific reporting to get people to question empty promises in the
future and realize that fighting crime and drug problems isn't
about electing a self-proclaimed drug warrior who picks and chooses
which drug dealers to target and which ones to befriend and make
part of his posse. To me, it is the most cynical "drug war"
rhetoric I've ever seen.
I don't know if he's the "worst mayor in America"-that's Reason's
phrase-but he certainly is competing for the title.
Thanks for all the comments.
- Cheryl
He is not from here, hell he had to come from TX in order to
find somewhere he felt "wanted".
Props to my home state for making this evil scum feel
unwanted.
He says he locks his bedroom, but young people seem to come in
and out at will.
Cue boom-chukka-wah-wah soundtrack.
The bed is tiny in the bedroom
I bet that's not the only that's tiny in the bedroom.
From the average observer, this lady Donna Ladd has painted a
picture of a corrupt mayor running wild in the city of Jackson. but
what she failed to write about was these 2 facts:
1.This man was corrupt way before he was elected mayor of Jackson
and the majority of the voters who voted already knew this but
voted him in anyway.
2.Her lack of getting vital information to the people pre-Melton's
mayorship via her free press rag(yes, she knew he was corrupt
beforehand and failed to warn more potential voters in Jackson),
has now created this "Melton must go" attitude.
When the truth is...Melton should have never been voted mayor in
the first place, and she knew this. She only decided to quiz this
guy in interviews AFTER the fact on many occassions of his known
corruption. Never once probing this guy for information prior to
him being elected. Only after he was mayor did she go on her
"sweeps & raids" with Melton and his cronies.
It's almost like an owner of raging pitbull who knows the dog will
bite, but waits until the dog bites somebody before he will warn
people walking by. same logic here.
Ask Donna who she voted for and I'm willing to bet it was Frank
Melton.
And although this article was well written, it reeks of liberal
spin and irresponsibility in journalism.
"So until you visit and live here and until you experience
Melton for yourself - don't criticize us and tell us to leave - we
just want our city back, damnit."
..tsk..tsk. the cries of a once Melton supporter now grimacing at
the ucler you've created for the city of Jackson. thanks a lot!
lol
Snapshot - why so bitter?
And to answer your statement (not question) I never have been a
melton supporter. I supported the incumbent mayor. I knew melton
was crazy at cat shit way before hand. As did Ms. Ladd.
But... I know there always has to be that one person that wants to
rile the nerves of everyone. I cheer you for taking the lead on
that - Bravo!!
Snapshot, I don't know where you're getting your information,
but your post is very amusing for anyone who has followed the
Melton saga over the last two and a half years. My paper is five
years old; we started it a year after I returned home to
Mississippi in 2001. Having been gone for 18 years, I knew very
little about Melton, except that people would say he was some kind
of folk hero/activist. When the mayoral election campaign rolled
around in January 2005, I did what we do to get started on campaign
coverage and called his campaign person to arrange a sitdown
interview with him. I soon found out that she was his sister-in-law
from Texas, and Melton proceeded to run from a real interview with
me for 14 months. From that day forward, I (later joined by
reporter Adam Lynch) did critical (meaning substantive) coverage of
him and his record. I dived into archives. I did lots of background
work. We developed sources. And we quickly figured out that Melton
was not right to be mayor, to put it mildly.
(See links down the right side of our Melton blog for
examples:
Also I point you to this
endorsed the incumbent in the Democratic primary, and then we
endorsed and I personally voted for Melton's Republican opponent,
Rick Whitlow, in the General. We ran every story and column we
could in order to help reverse years of adoring media coverage
before the election. It didn't work. Then.
My conscience is clear.
Donna,
Let me know if anyone has other factual questions.
What about speeding tickets? Can I drive my 1972 hybrid Dodge
Charger as fast as I think is safe through town without a
ticket?
Will be glad to give you a ride in it when I am finished
restoring!
I disagree about the new train station in downtown Jackson, it's beautiful and it DOES get used, I've been there myself.
I'm no more bitter than you are SBH. I too voted for the
incumbent, and went a step further and convinced a great number
of
would-be voters to do the same.
and maybe "shooting him in the head" is more nerve-rattling than my
comments don't you think?
I don't deserve your rally call. somebody else up there is lobbying
for that.
Argh. I screwed up those links in my last post. I meant:
Read the column
I wrote about Melton and the
profile of Melton I wrote before the primary. Here's my
most recent column about him, written a couple weeks ago. It
has some more details about the ride-alongs.
Sorry for links snafu. We do them different on our site.
"Snapshot, I don't know where you're getting your information,
but your post is very amusing for anyone who has followed the
Melton saga over the last two and a half years. My paper is five
years old; we started it a year after I returned home to
Mississippi in 2001. Having been gone for 18 years, I knew very
little about Melton,..."
With all due respect, I find that VERY HARD to believe. Even the
most unknowing traveller to Jackson gets the "411" on Frank Melton.
He's the most recognized pariah in the city. And he's been here
since the early 80's. how could you not know or "see" how corrupt
this man is or capable of being? I'm not a political analyst, but I
know a lame duck when I see or hear one quack.
It's simple: I wasn't following Jackson city politics when I
lived out of the state. But as soon as I started following/covering
him, I saw and started reporting the problems with him, when no
other media would and have steadily since them, as other media have
joined us. Perhaps you might go back and read our coverage before
making false statements about, say, how I voted. Then we could
start on the same page and have a good conversation about it. I
have no reason to mislead you or anyone; the evidence of what we've
done/said has been right there on our Web site for years now. And
we were willing to be critical of him when it was not popular to
do.
Melton has indeed been in the city since the 1980s, but he was not
treated at all like a "pariah." My research of all the media
archives show that he was long treated as a folk hero by an adoring
media that did not give people the information they needed to make
informed decisions about him-and, indeed, enthusiastically endorsed
him.
(The daily newspaper was even wound up in a lawsuit with him
because they published a damning memo about narcotics agents that
he had leaked to them that turned out to be false. At the time of
their endorsement of him, he was lying under oath to a judge,
saying he hadn't leaked the document. They endorsed him anyway,
even as they had pointedly omitted news of their role in that
lawsuit throughout the campaign. We broke
that story locally as well.)
I'm choosing not to be judgmental about Jacksonians' refusal to see
the real Melton, but I am regularly urging people not to simply
blame him for this mess. Jackson residents need to recognize the
role many of them played in making such a person a "folk hero" for
the very basic reason that it does not need to happen again. The
truth is, the city elected a man with a track record of such
shenanigans.
When he says the city got what they elected, he's not wrong.
"It's simple: I wasn't following Jackson city politics when I
lived out of the state. But as soon as I started following/covering
him, I saw and started reporting the problems with him, when no
other media would and have steadily since them, as other media have
joined us."
I see. but as an apprentice to an editor, I'm currently doing my
research on Charlotte,NC before I move there from Jackson. so if
you didn't know about Melton, you should have. so I give you the
benefit of the doubt of not knowing.
Secondly, I didn't mean to lump you in with the rest of the jaded
Melton supporters, but your article is similar to "beating a dead
horse" with a gracious amount of liberalism mixed in, in my
opinion. no offense if you are a liberal, I just picked up on it
from reading. don't ask me how. I haven't been to your website but
if it's "liberal based", I'm probably not interested but I will
give it a look see from your links posted above.
"Melton has indeed been in the city since the 1980s, but he was not
treated at all like a "pariah."
Now here, I don't know where YOU were getting your information,
probably some Melton supporters, but the majority of clear thinkers
in this city have always viewed Mr. Melton as a hot-headed control
freak(see- the Bottom Line rants on WLBT archives). And now that he
is Mayor, "others" are finally waking up to his real persona.
While Melton has been a major let down he by no means is
responsible for all of Jackson's problems. The former mayor Harvey
Johnson created a lot of the current problems and mayor before him
can be blamed also.
It's funny Ms. Ladd says Melton had to come to MS to feel loved.
Although she is from MS she moved away from here for many years.
She has no clue about the state as a whole and does not know as
much about Jackson as she thinks she does.
Melton has made some really screwed up choices, but he is by no
means evil. He is power hungry and has no idea how the financially
run a city, but he did have some good ideas when elected. Problem
is he has no idea how to enact any of his ideas.
As for Jackson itself. It was once a great city and can be again.
It does have theater, opera, ballet, and many other forms of arts
just like other cities it size. This is a lot of crime, but it
didn't just start with the current mayor. With that said the crime
rate is about the same as other cities it's size or maybe a little
higher in some areas.
The areas surrounding Jackson or vibrant and growing with housing,
retail, and commerical development. Some of the people living in
the burbs would like to move back to Jackson and help bring the
city back. It's just that the city has to become more welcoming to
them and others that may be moving in from outside the area.
"As for Jackson itself. It was once a great city..."
Pre-Danks era.
It's been decades since Jackson lost it's luster. this city won't
walk upright again until the people stop following sorry Mayors out
to pasture just because they are black or empathize with the poor
communities.
Jackson folks want to moan and groan about crime but when you get a mayor who wants to get control of it, hands-on, all you do is complain. Either learn to live in the crime infested shithole of Jackson or get the hell out of the way and let somebody clean it up.
Melton has made some really screwed up choices, but he is by
no means evil. He is power hungry and has no idea how the
financially run a city,
If power-hungry and incompetent doesn't add up to evil, what
does?
cmd, I didn't say that "Melton had to come to MS to feel loved."
I don't know that to be true, and I don't feel the need to guess at
his motives. Perhaps someone else said that. Even if I were to
guess at his motives, which I'm not going to do, I wouldn't pick
that one.
Jason, the mayor has done nothing to "clean up" crime in Jackson.
And even if he were trying to "clean up" crime, I'm too
libertarian-leaning to believe that he gets to do that by any means
necessary, damn the Constitution.
snapshot, I sure do wish that "majority" of thinkers who considered
Melton a "pariah" had turned out to vote two years ago. Instead, he
was elected by a rainbow coalition ranging from white Republicans
to black Democrats, and all points in between, who believed the
hype. Y'all speak up a little louder next time; we needed you
then.
As for all the efforts to tuck me into some stereotypical little
political box, this is the way I described myself on my own Web
site earlier:
"I'm a libertarian-leaning progressive who supported Clinton's
impeachment, am not a Democrat or a Republican, and believe that
government should be as small as possible without sacrificing our
moral obligation to help those in need."
What any of that has to do with Frank Melton's methods-which an
alliance of people with many different political allegiances is
questioning here in Jackson-is beyond me. If I was what you're
trying to paint me, wouldn't I be supporting Frank Melton no matter
what because he's a black Democrat?
I don't do blind partisanship, regardless of the party or
ideology.
"snapshot, I sure do wish that "majority" of thinkers who
considered Melton a "pariah" had turned out to vote two years ago.
Instead, he was elected by a rainbow coalition ranging from white
Republicans to black Democrats, and all points in between, who
believed the hype. Y'all speak up a little louder next time; we
needed you then."
As do I. and I think they did(speak up). but I can only speak for
the ones I actually drove to the polls, despite some having angst
against voting at all..
I've come to the realization that most, if not all, voters in
Jackson enjoy going along with the concensus, even if it means
their ruin in return. It's like a deer in headlights syndrome. most
don't know what hit them until it's too late. and most don't care
as long as their boat isn't rocked. then you have those that think
voting doesn't work at all... the fat of the land so-to-speak.
To bad jessie and al don't have the integrity to go after a black man. Lets face it, if the mayor was white we would never hear the end of it. Lets just worry about the jenna 6, all they did was a 6 on 1 beatdown of a white guy and naacp gets their panties in a wad because of harsh sentences. Where are all the racial crybabies?
for some strange reason, this last comment by "bob" reminds me of the white lady who drowned her 5 sons in cold blood and got a slap on the wirst and deemed "insane" to keep her from feeling the sting of the death penalty that so many blacks have felt in the past, in Texas. speaking of justice?
As someone who frequently disagrees with Ms. Ladd and publicly
criticizes her positions at times, I must say that is column
written by her is dead on the money.
Melton is a joke of a mayor and has no respect for principles dear
to Libertarians.
When he first took office, he immediately moved to shut down the
broadcasting of the weekly City Council meetings on the public
access channel, even though it had been a regular feature for
years. He then stopped releasing all crime statistics to the
public. Only the settlement of a lawsuit filed by the media caused
the release of some crime statistics. When it was noted that crime
had increased under his watch, he said that the previous
administration had intentionally misreported the crime statistics.
Unfortunately, such a response is all too often his modus operandi.
Whenever challenged, he will state that his opponent on that issue
is corrupt. When damaging facts are pointed out to him, he usually
says that the previous administration was understating the problem.
Be that as it may, he has repeatedly tried to reduce the public's
access to its government.
Ms. Ladd was correct in her reporting of his dealings with
juveniles. What is sad is that more and more of these teen-agers
get into WORSE trouble AFTER they become associated with him. See
her reporting on Michael Taylor. Since he moved in with Melton, he
has graduated to arrests for armed robbery, then later carjacking
and extortion. Then there was a star football player that was
busted for drugs. Melton intervened and took him under his wing. He
is now being prosecuted for bringing a gun to school in the last
year. Then there was another who stole a car, and so on. What is
sad is the list keeps growing.
However, Melton does not stop with juvenile delinquents. He has
moved on to abusing private business owners. For some reason he has
gotten worked up over A-1 Pallets, a pallet recycling company. It
employes forty people and pays taxes. It is in a blighted area of
town. For some reason Melton is trying to tear it down, calling it
an embarrassment. He hasn't really said what will replace it, he
just calls it a nuisance with no proof and says he will ignore the
city council and the laws on the books and tear it down anyway. So
much for property rights.
Next is Second Amendment rights. Like many incompetent politicians,
Melton took office (spouting conservative rhetoric by the way) and
tried to ban gun shows in direction violation of state law. This is
usually done by politicians who ignore the fact that gun shows
follow the same federal laws as regular gun dealers. Its usually
done by a grandstanding politician who wants an easy headline
without actually doing something about crime.
So we have public access to government, gun rights, private
property rights. What is next? Oh yes, search and seizure.
Upon taking office, Melton immediately started going out on raids
with the police. He kept the police mobile command center at his
house, often taking his young wards out on the streets with him at
night in the MCC. He carried guns and personally used dogs in
roadblocks and searches. He has not been trained in the use of dogs
nor firearms. He has not completed a certified law enforcement
training program in Mississippi. He claimed as Mayor he was chief
law enforcement officer and claimed not to need such
certification.
Not stopping there, Melton has systematically destroyed the rest of
hte police department. He appointed a chief who had no experience
as a chief or assistant police chief in any jurisdiction. The
number of police officers has dropped to 410. Crime has
skyrocketed. He brought in a former police chief as a consultant
who was forced out by the previous administration for misconduct.
The consultant is the father in law of his bodyguard, who he just
promoted to assistant police chief, even though he is not qualified
to be a police officer with rank. When the veteran officers
complain, he threatens to replace them with recruits currently in
training .
One must ask how he was elected. Ms. Ladd's paper had provided very
thorough coverage on Melton for the last few years. Sadly enough,
the main newspaper here, Gannett-owned, did not do so before he was
elected. However, one must ask what effect it would have had as Mr.
Melton owned a tv station. Do the numbers and determine which one
has more effect on voters: a newspaper that has a circulation of
30-50,000 or so or a TV station or reaching hundreds of thousands
of people every week where the owner takes a minute at the end of
the program every week on the highest rated news program to provide
his take on things.
Having said that, for anyone to accuse Ms. Ladd of covering for
Melton or supporting him is either ignorant or a liar. Her
newspaper has been one of the few media outlets that have provided
consistent, thorough reporting of Melton and his antics. It is hard
to believe that a mayor acts like this in a major American city but
unfortunately, it is all true.
snapshot, I've sat here and watched you "pine" about this article and I'm sick of it. who cares if Donna knew Frank prior to him being elected, the point is, none of us would know half the stuff we've learned about Frank without her due diligence in fact-finding. it's people like you that give Jackson a bad name. You're probably a "Frank supporter" yourself and just wish to stir the spot. I moved here to Jackson 3 years ago and I too was "unknowing" about Frank myself. but after finding out about the JFP, although I'm far from liberal, I now have a clearer understanding of this man. but I will say, I voted for him out of ignorance. SUE ME!!!!
"Worst Mayor in America?" This guy could move to Phoenix next. He could bookend with the county's "Toughest Sheriff in America," Joe Arpaio, who also qualifies as the worst sheriff in America. Actually, it would be best if they both moved to, say, New Orleans, so when it's swept into the ocean the country would be rid of them both.
Millsap -
Spare me the "Sue Me" rant, please.
And not knowing about Frank could be used as a cop-out these days
for people who voted him in and now see they've made a terrible
mistake. At least you claimed it.
As for me, I've NEVER voted for somebody without doing a THOROUGH
check of their history and background as a politician. so for you
to "vote for him out of ignornace", all I have to say to that
is...YOUR FAULT. not only did you not research the candidate you
voted for, you've effectively helped Jackson take gigantic steps
backwards in progress. so please, don't try to put me in your group
of "know-nots" because I know better. and to be honest, you
should've never voted but instead kept your hanging chad to
yourself until you found out the truth or at the very least found
out about the candidates..
Joe Arpaio=Best Sheriff in America
My bet is the only ones that don't like him or criminals that have
been in his jail and of course the ACLU.
Kingfish is right. Ladd covered the story. The problem is that her reach is very small and not influential. She wasn't idle but she is ineffective.
what's the big deal here? Melton let us down...BIG DEAL...just vote in another one. no need to put him on blast for the nation to see. It makes the state of Mississippi look bad. He's an in-house problem than we have to fix, that's all. so let's "fix him" and move on. I'm sure we can all agree on that point.
maybe Ladd can be Mayor...but is Jackson ready for a female commander-in-chief? probably not, but we wasn't ready for mr. melton to ransack our city either..
Being from Jackson, having read the JFP and contributed to their
online forum on a number of occasions, having disagreed with some
things the JFP says and stands for as well as sometimes agreeing
with what the JFP says and stands for, and having seen Melton from
afar and up close I can say that not only is Ladd's story factually
accurate, it really does not come close to telling the full extent
of the insanity of the Melton administration and the chagrin of
many Jackson citizens feel.
I won't go so far as to say the Melton's predecessor was a great
mayor as Donna often does, but he certainly was not on the
mismanagement lunatic fringe that Melton is.
And btw, the JFP FREQUENTLY pointed out Melton's questionable past,
unethical campaigning, and ridiculous "policy statements" (if one
could really call them that) during the primary and prior to the
general election. The only reason more citizens didn't take head is
because the rage of a statewide paper not only refused to mention
these things, printed false reports concerning the incumbent as fed
to them by Melton supporters.
We do have a great photo of Melton and the b-guards that looks
straight out of "Reservoir Dogs." I'll post a link if I can find
it.
"Stuck in the middle with us ... "
BTW, I have no interest in being mayor, never, ever, never. I
prefer keeping on an eye on 'em.
I'm going to ignore all of the civil rights violations that make
up the story...
Mr. Mayor, it's one thing to be tough on crime, it's another to die
from multiple gunshot wounds when you, an untrained and unqualified
civilian, assume the role and responsibilities of trained police
officers. Maybe your antics look good to your voters but you should
remember the old saying that "it's better to be seen than viewed".
Mr. Mayor, if even part of the story is true, you're going to get
yourself and innocent people killed. Let the professionals do their
jobs.
Or, is it possible that the Mayor only kicks-in doors of known
non-drug dealers? He likes to look tough while not actually being
tough?
The more I ponder the more I channel Teddy Roosevelt...
"Bully"!
Of course, I then start to wonder how he differs from the average
politician...and I recall the Harry Reid Smear Letter... Is this
another case of "guess the political party"?
If you want some more info about Melton, here it is:
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/07/meltons-protege-set-free-to-terrorize.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/07/1-pallets-build-it-up-or-tear-it-down.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/07/is-1-pallets-eyesore-you-be-judge.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/06/update-on-meltons-new-tool-for-fighting.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/05/hey-frank-why-dont-you-show-some.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/08/melton-no-friggin-clue.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/06/melton-hijacking-mdot-cameras.html
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2007/05/you-cant-be-serious-jackson-fire.html
Kingfish is another good writer in Jackson. Ladd isn't the only one though she thinks she is the only good one. Give.us.a.f'ing.break.already.
[Me: Jackson born and bred]
Melton is frankly nuts, but SBH, Jackson is in no way a great city.
It isn't just "white flight" anymore. Harvey and his stupid
convention center boondoggle alone will cost the city more than
Melton's antics.
I hate to say it, but my hometown has been declining most of my
life and it's looking worse every year. The best and the brightest
get the hell out, and even the average now move to Madison, etc, if
not completely out of state.
I can't blame them....I live in Denver, which has arguably the Best
Mayor in America. I never want to move back to Jackson.
Kingfish is a blogger not a journalist and that's useful. Not the same thing though. As for Ladd's 'reach', put 'Frank Melton' in Google and see what the JFP's 'reach' is. And, it sounds from the leaks like the FBI is following the trail her paper has blazed. I'd call that 'reach'.
Whoppee! BFD. Google hits don't move voters to swing elections. If Ladd had any pull in Jackson we'd have already installed Harvey Johnson as Mayor-for-Life. Get a clue.
I see Larry.
Like when Melton tried to get his venue changed citing JFP
pre-trial coverage? Then the judge denied the motion finding that
nobody reads the free alt.
Some reach. LMAO.
Larry,
never said otherwise. No false advertising here. Every post I have
is properly sourced to local media when they are quoted or used.
TV, Newspaper, even the JFP. I stand by everything written, posted,
and cited.
Ms. Ladd didn't even get around to Melton's penchant for firing
qualified agency heads and attempting to replace them with very
underqualified people. Example: Head of Parks and Recreation, an
agency with a multi-million dollar budget, was very well-respected
throughout the city and state. Melton canned him and tried to
replace him with a cop that was a former driver of his. No
experience or expertise at all. Council rejected his choice. Melton
said he would ignore state law and let him continue as the interim
head indefinitely. This is usually the norm, not the exception.
"The only reason more citizens didn't take head is because the
rage of a statewide paper not only refused to mention these things,
printed false reports concerning the incumbent as fed to them by
Melton supporters."
Typical cop-out statement.
It bewilders me to no end why the so-called educated voters of
Jackson aka "the BOURGEOIS" aka the majority, never seem to know
thoroughly about the candidates they elect into office. then they
wonder why people vacate the city in droves.
All I know is he promised us a state-of-the-arts studios but he left us hanging like he never said it. I feel so stupid now for supporting this crazed vigilante.
Kingfish - I got a question for you..
WHY on earth, if you have all this information on Melton, it's only
coming to the light now? everybody don't pick up the JFP..You seem
to be hot on Frank's heels and appear to have known him for some
time, more than Miss Ladd at least. so why didn't you go to the
WAPT, or local access, or fliers in the streets and make sure
people knew about this guy and the potential damage he could cause
our city?
to me, your postings on Melton are worthless now.
How hard is it to place an ad in the Thrifty Nickel that says "Town
Hall Meeting" to get people informed?
I did my part by informing as many as I could over the phone and in
person and I pray they voted against this moron. it wasn't
enough.
I can't do it all alone. you media outlets need to step up your
information prowess adn stop being so biased in your
reporting.
CL, JFP, etc...all you guys do is backbite on each other, while the
fox is in the hen house.
STOP THAT!
what we SHOULD do is flog Melton across his buttucks until the cherry red welps of pain register inside his feeble mind. "Nuts" is an understatement for this loon.
good question. Alot of stuff was not reported by the media before he was elected. He had never been a politician before and thus had no real track record. Except for that one perjury case when he was director of the Bureau of Narcotics, there was not much that would tell you he would do all of these things. People relied on his tough talking tv commentary that he gave for over ten years. The JFP reported some things but honestly, I did not read the paper at the time. I've made it a point to become better informed since then and accept that chastizement from you.
snapshot -- "It bewilders me to no end why the so-called
educated voters of Jackson aka "the BOURGEOIS" aka the majority,
never seem to know thoroughly about the candidates they elect into
office. then they wonder why people vacate the city in
droves."
Actually, Melton was elected with an odd combination of voters from
the wealthier white northeast section of Jackson and the poorest of
central and west Jackson black precincts during the Democratic
primary. Keep in mind that the real election was the Democratic
primary, which saw large numbers voting in ordinarily Republican
dominated precincts. (There was no GOP primary as a result of one
candidate "dropping out.")
Then in the so-called general election, the lone remaining
Republican candidate avoided campaign activities like the plague
only to hand Melton a victory in one of the lowest turnouts in a
technically "competitive" general election.
Wonder why the Republican didn't campaign?
Well, he ended up getting a job with Melton's
administration....
Raggsy makes it sound like it was a close election. It wasn't. Melton won 77 of 95 precincts. He didn't need one single solitary vote from "the wealthier white northeast section" to win. Yeah, Melton duped alot of whites out of their dollars to fund his campaign but he won that election by swamping the incumbent in the black community of this 73% black city. White GOP voters didn't put that lunatic into that office.
Yep, Melton brilliantly used a lot of white Republican dollars
to get black Democratic votes. That wasn't the only way he got
them, though. I've already mentioned that he is brilliant at saying
just what people wanted to hear. Yes, many politicians do that, but
not like Melton does. Trust me.
If you go looking for critical media coverage of Melton pre-mayoral
campaign and JFP, you will find very look. I know; I've looked for
it. I have very extensive files on just about everything ever
written about him in the media. We became critical very soon after
he appeared on our radar as a potential public servant. We haven't
let off, and won't as long as he is in the position to spend
taxpayer money.
Over the last couple years, since Melton took office, more and more
people have gradually joined us on the critical side of the fence,
including a number of local bloggers. I think that's great. I
should also add that one other media figure, conservative (and
black) radio talk show host Kim Wade, was also critical of him back
during his campaign. Kim and I don't agree on everything, but we
often agree on Melton.
For the record, the Republican (Rick Whitlow) did not stay with the
Melton administration very long. I've seen no evidence that he was
part of the inner circle in any way. Quite the contrary,
really.
"People relied on his tough talking tv commentary that he gave
for over ten years. "
that's all?..man you are breaking my heart.
I'm an ordinary person trying to cut my teeth in journalism and if
it's one thing I would have discounted melton on is the glaring
fact that he has never run a city....period. he has never been on
any city's city council(red flag #2)...and his brazen "Sheriff
pike" attiude in person and in print would be a enough for me to
ring the alram that THIS GUY...is NOT our guy.
Miss Ladd pointed out that she voted for whitlow...which, I don't
understand either...but he was damn sure someone with a LITTLE
class about himself at the very least. and I think he would've
listened to the city more, to quite honest.
yes, I voted for harvey, but as his time in office wore on I
realized he was not the guy to lead this city either.
One thing I do get tired of is voting in people just....
because.
that's old hat.
Rex Raggs - I've read your last comments
But that still has nothing to do with making sure the citizenry is
aware of this guy.
NO WONDER THE VOTER TURNOUT WAS LOW.
simple cause and effect.
Most of the people didn't cared for the cause(Jackson)
and now we all are suffering the effects(high crime, corruption,
backsliding, city in a slump)
make sense?
WE GOT TO DO BETTER PEOPLE!!!!!
GIVE A DAMN FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIVES!
"We became critical very soon after he appeared on our radar as
a potential public servant. We haven't let off, and won't as long
as he is in the position to spend taxpayer money.
that's good. keep it up. but I think the damamage was done when we
allowed this guy into City Hall first place...He has literally
"upheaved" a lot of things and got the whole city in an uproar. It
will take some years to fix after he's gone. and if I have my way,
he WILL be gone if I have to run him out of the city myself.
Matt => "Raggsy makes it sound like it was a close election.
It wasn't. Melton won 77 of 95 precincts (one precinct was a tie
vote). He didn't need one single solitary vote from 'the wealthier
white northeast section to win. Yeah, Melton duped alot of whites
out of their dollars to fund his campaign but he won that election
by swamping the incumbent in the black community of this 73% black
city. White GOP voters didn't put that lunatic into that
office."
Actually, I never said it was close. I never even hinted
that.
Yes, Johnson won only 17 of 95 precincts in the Democratic Primary.
Yes, Melton likely would have won if there had been a Republican
primary and the Republican precincts stayed out of the Democratic
vote. However, to say that white GOP voters did not help elect
Melton is at best disingenuous and at worst blatant BS.
Since you want to argue about statistics, take a look at the
precinct votes and you will notice the citywide vote was Melton
62.8%, Johnson 36.5% (a 3rd candidate received only .7%). However,
in the northeast precincts typically voting for GOP candidates in
the last three election cycles, the vote never fell below 78% for
Melton while by comparison the rest of the city's precincts
averaged only 56% for Melton.
(ftp://www.co.hinds.ms.us/elections/20050503-dem-jackson.zip
)
Could Melton have been elected without the northeast GOP votes (and
money)? Yes.
Would he have received the appearance of a landslide? HARDLY
Would he have possibly moderated his lunacy without the "mandate"
the GOP votes appeared to solidify?
Who knows?
You're too funny Raggsy. Wards 2-7 cast 82% of the total votes
in that primary. Melton won over 57% of those votes versus a
two-term incumbent Democrat's Democrat with eight years of the
mayoral bully pulpit under his belt. You somehow believe the
smaller 15% net margin over the "real Democrat" Johnson (without
Ward 1) would have given Melton the lunatic pause to go slower and
act more cautiously once he got sworn in? You are naive. Haven't
you read anything Ladd has written?
You and the other Johnson apologists need to put down the bottle
and sober up long enough to face the cold hard facts of the lives
your still living in denial. Johnson lost the election in the black
community. The question you need to ask is how. Let me give you a
little hint, blaming it on an uninformed black electorate or the
Clarion-Ledger or the whites in Ward 1 or low turnout (it wasn't)
is not the answer to the question. All that may dovetail nicely
into your various conspiracy theories but it still ain't the
answer.
I'll be the first to admit I wasted my vote on Harvey Johnson in
the past. but eventhough he was a jellyfish, I would prefer his
slow-to-pull-the-trigger style over Melton's brazen acts of
ignorance and arrogance right about now.
The point of all this is..Jackson is in dire need of a Mayor that
knows how to run a city effectively. PERIOD. Jackson has been
without a good mayor for at least 25 years. and that's a damn shame
in anybody's eyes.
We tried to "look outside" of the state for possible leadership for
Jackson and all we could come up with is Frank Melton?
Maybe if Jackson was forced to unicorporate due to ridiculous
lawsuits, money mismanagemment, and weak leadership. ...mayabe if
the people have to move out into the burbs to survive..maybe..just
maybe the people will get a clue.
Matt-- "You and the other Johnson apologists need to put down
the bottle and sober up ..."
Proves you don't even know what you're talking about; such poor
assumptions. Read my earlier posts. I am no Johnson apologist,
having voted for Anelle Vaughn Smith in the Democratic primary and
Rick Whitlow (R) in the general election.
Further, I never said the Democratic primary was low turnout, I
said the general election was one of the lowest turnouts in recent
history.
And I don't drink, btw.
0-3
Rex and Ladd you both do realize that voting for Rick Whitlow
helped to insure Melton's victory, right?
split the votes.
some people could view that as helping Melton get in.
No, it didn't, Peggy. Melton ran against Whitlow, head to head, in the general election. Melton was the Dem; Whitlow was the Repub. It didn't split any vote.
Ladd-
I was referring to the votes between Harvey and Whitlow.
Whitlow has no history in politics. He was a sportscaster. He was
not going to win regardless. Most just voted for him because he
wasn't Harvey. But at least Harvey did what he could when he could.
his hands were tied most of the time but the public didn't know how
hard he had to fight for the little bit Jackson has now.
Huh, Peggy? Harvey didn't run against Whitlow; he ran against
Melton in the Democratic primary. Voting for Whitlow, a Republican
in the general election, in no way "split the vote" or "helped to
insure Melton's victory." Let me break it down for you:
Democratic Primary: Frank Melton vs. Harvey Johnson (incumbent) vs.
Annelle Smith
General Election: Democrat Frank Melton vs. Republican Rick
Whitlow
Perhaps you're mixing Whitlow up with Smith? That would make more
sense. If one had voted for Smith, you could argue that it helped
split the vote in Melton's favor-but certainly that wasn't the
deciding factor. A bipartisan, multiracial coalition of voters
across Jackson was fooled by Melton. Trying to blame it on one or
another party is now foolish (although I do blame the Democratic
Party for not rejecting Melton from his ticket when he lied about
moving his homestead exemption from Texas to them). But in a more
general sense, he was truly a bipartisan mistake, er, choice.
Voting for Whitlow was, indeed, a protest vote. And I have no doubt
in my mind that of the two choices in the general election that
Whitlow would have been a better mayor than Melton. A certain
single mother would still have her rental property on Ridgeway
Street intact, for one example of many.
Ladd-
I think you are misunderstanding me.
before I respond I want you to ask yourself this question: when was
the last time Jackson had a Republican Mayor that you can
remember?
let's continue...
You voted for Whitlow, right? well, that could've been a vote for
Harvey in the general election since he was better qualified than
Whitlow and Whitlow wasn't going to win anyway had Harvey beat out
Melton.. that's why I said (split up the votes)
The point I'm making here is, Whitlow(R) was not going to win no
matter what. That's a given if you've lived in Jackson long enough.
Jackson is mostly Democratic in terms of voting despite what you
read and hear. He is possibly a class act, but that wouldn't have
been enough to sway these
Jacksonians. the people who voted for Whitlow(minus your vote) most
likely knew he wouldn't win either and chances are they voted for
Melton in the primary election to make sure Harvey had no chance in
the general.
Frank basically won the election off "bait and switch" if you ask
me. and you can bet your bottom dollar that Jacksonians love a good
show and Frank put on a good one. Bascially the squeaky wheel got
the grease, but deserved none of it.
I totally understand what you were TRYING to do with protest
voting. I've done it myself in the past. sometimes it worked, other
times it didn't. In this particular case, I knew that it would not
work or I would've done exactly like you did and voted for Whitlow.
But the fact of the matter is Whitlow was not near as strong enough
candidate, coupled with Harvey's soft-shoe approach to winning his
own Mayorship back led to the victory by Melton.
Now had Whitlow been about the business of winning over the people
and providing leadership qualities in the city prior to running for
office, instead of allowing Frank to grandstand his way into
office. Whitlow wouldv'e possibly won, but honestly, I don't think
he wanted it as bad as Frank did. Nor did Harvey.
Harvey and Whitlow appeared passive in their passion for running
this city, and that's why they lost.
"Harvey and Whitlow appeared passive in their passion for
running this city, and that's why they lost."
I have to agree on this point if not much else.
but Peggy T. you have to understand that regardless of Whitlow,
Harvey's support was dwindling. and that's his own fault. He seem
to lose his zest to be Mayor.
I helped Harvey's campaign when he was first elected mayor by
making calls etc...this time, it seem like his people were not as
enthusiastic about winning it again so it left me wondering if he
really wanted it. I still voted for him, but in the general
election, I didn't vote at all. I just had no idea why Whitlow was
running in the first place and I'd be damned if I was going to vote
for Melton.
Peggy wrote: You voted for Whitlow, right? well, that
could've been a vote for Harvey in the general election since he
was better qualified than Whitlow and Whitlow wasn't going to win
anyway had Harvey beat out Melton.. that's why I said (split up the
votes)
Peggy, you have your basic facts wrong here. I don't know how to
make it more clear: Johnson was not in the general election because
Melton beat him in the Democratic primary. Then Melton ran against
Whitlow. I would have voted for Johnson had it made it to the
General Election--but he didn't. He never ran against
Whitlow.
In other words, there is no way that a vote for Whitlow in the
General Election could split the vote and help Melton. A vote for
him was, pure and simple, a vote against Melton and/or for Whitlow.
Nothing else. Johnson was out of the equation by then.
I voted for Johnson in the primary, and for Whitlow in the general,
as I've said already.
Is this clear yet? I don't know how else to eludicate this, so I'll
stop trying.
Every voter who touched the screen for Melton in the primary
made a mistake but it was the black community, black Democrats, who
propelled him to victory at the polls.
The election results are the election results. To overcome
the advantage Melton built in the rest of Jackson, Johnson would
have needed 84.9% of the vote in Ward 1, the white Republican ward,
to win the primary outright in the three candidate race.
Ladd needs to spin it differently because otherwise her storyline
of a conspiracy amongst Jackson's white community to oust Johnson
doesn't play out.
You're completely misrepresenting my comments, Matt, as is
obvious from actually reading them-I haven't mentioned a conspiracy
among anyone to oust Johnson. I've said that it was a coalition of
very different people, in fact (and the stories about their fights
during the campaign are near-epic). There was certainly a North
Jackson "citizens' committee" that came together to do that,
certainly, but it didn't include every white person in North
Jackson, just a few determined ones, most of whom likely feel like
utter fools right now. I mean, that isn't a secret, what with
Melton's finance director apologizing all over town for organizing
all these people and doing the fund raising from rich Republicans
right in his own restaurant. And there were also black groups that
came together to oust Johnson as well-namely the Jackson Advocate
folks. (The history of that historically pro-segregation
newspaper-that annointed blacks who work with whites in the "Brown
Society" and regularly bash white Republicans, many of whom also
supported Melton-would blow all you Jackson newbies' minds even
further, so I want go deep into that now!) Suffice it to say that
race politics in Mississippi are much more complicated than Tom
Brokaw tries to tell you.
Then there were the progressives, black and white, who voted for
him precisely because he had multiracial, party support-thinking
that was oh-so-progressive and not getting what they were getting
into.
Like I said, Melton is a bipartisan problem and always has been. He
has (had) one of the most bizarre rainbow coalitions of supporters
I've ever seen-and he said exactly what they all wanted to hear,
and back then his supporters weren't willing to listen to fact and
reason, pardon the pun. *Any* efforts to blame either major party
(neither of which I care for much) for him are silly. He's bigger
than partisan politics, and they are both to blame for getting
behind someone with such a record of thumbing his nose at the
Constitution and who promised truly ridiculous things in order to
get votes.
I do remember saying way back during the campaign that when Melton
failed as mayor that it would be funny to watch all his
enthusiastic Republican funders/supporters try to pass the buck and
blame Democrats. And it is funny, as watching silly party squabbles
always is.
I do blame the media, though, for not telling the real Melton story
(much of which they knew), and I blame Harvey Johnson for not
having a stronger voice or staff around him-but he was up against
quite the machine(s). I've never said he was perfect, but he sure
as hell had his head on a lot straighter than this guy. Beyond
that, there is remarkable history on Melton's rise to power that
goes back many years, but you're going to have to read that in
future writings from me. Hang on. This story is far from over.
The author speaks the truth in that last post. The gentleman she
refers to as his campaign finance director turned against him and
voiced his opinion about Melton's tenure as mayor. This individual
is someone who cares about his town and puts his money where his
mouth is as he has opened several restaurants in Jackson instead of
fleeing to the suburbs.
He cares enough about Jackson to raise money for the police through
the Jackson Police Foundation. Well, Melton tried to have the
foudnation disbanded right after he spoke out against Melton even
though he had no legal authority to disband it (He wanted to grab
its multi million dollar budget to shore up his deficit, money that
was meant for the police department, which is always
underfunded).
The result is, Melton went out of his way to alienate the private
citizens group that helped the police even though it was headed by
the man who helped elect him.
Now comes the Ladd narrative about media failure to tell the
true and complete Melton story. Her need to blame the local media
is more about Ladd's deep seated trade animus, really a
fundamentalist chip on her shoulder for journalistic orthodoxy,
than about the hope and a prayer for a different election
result.
Had the media reported on Melton to Ladd's exacting standards it
may have swung some white Republican votes to Johnson or, more
likely, back to the sidelines versus crossing over in the primary,
and the overall margin of victory over Johnson may have been much
smaller, but the result would still, in the end, have been a Melton
win.
What Ladd still doesn't get is that black Jackson needed a hero,
almost any hero, even a terribly flawed hero and nothing was going
to get in the way of that change.
Because after eight years King Harvey had completely lost touch
with the commoners who swept him to office as Jackson's first black
mayor back in 1997. The black community had become sick and tired
of being treated like subjects in a monarchy versus citizen
partners in a representative government within this 73% black
city.
The king was deposed and replaced with a despot. Such are the
mistakes voters make. Harvey Johnson lost touch. Plain and very,
very simple.
Matt, we are SO far from "exacting standards" for media in this
case that it's not even funny. For instance, asking The
Clarion-Ledger to report that they were even involved in a lawsuit
with Melton during the campaign in which their editors knew (or
were required to know) that he was lying under oath to a judge
about leaking them a false memo about law enforcement officers.
Instead, they gave him a ringing endorsement while keeping all of
the information (from their involvement in the lawsuit to his
lying) from the public! There are many, many more examples that are
even more disturging. Stay tuned.
Oh, and good media coverage of Melton during the campaign was
clearly too late, no matter who did it. The media blackout on him
has gone for decades now. I know that, and it was clear that our
coverage wasn't going to sway this deep-seated problem. However,
that doesn't mean we jumped on the adoration wagon, too, just
because it was the thing to do. Thus, my conscience today is clear,
if troubled.
The funny part is that I don't disagree with you about Johnson: He
did lose touch. The "King Harvey"-monarchy stuff is clear
hyperbole, though, but hey this town is ruled by hyperbole.
Hopefully, that will change, and the Melton Era will teach us to
return to considering, and demanding from our media, the cold, hard
facts that people need to make smart decisions. Damn partisanship.
I hate it, and it sure has no place in Jackson's mayoral
politics.
The black people of Jackson, I dare say, don't need a "hero." They
need their communities repaired and their problems takens seriously
(as do whites and other races). The problem here is that they were
sold a bill of goods by a powerful rainbow coalition of selfish
people, and thus taken advantage of. It's really too bad that
Melton's myth was not exposed earlier, but the good news is that
the city really has the opportunity to grow as a result of
it.
Otherwise, I know some of you are miffed at me-I and my paper have
served as the primary messenger of all this bad news for the
longest period of time, and I wish we hadn't had to play that role.
But the bad news is the bad news, no matter who delivers it. The
question now is: What do we do to change the circumstances that
allowed this to happen. There are a multitude of solutions, and all
are needed: Better media literacy (which is happening, thankfully)
is one. Another is lobbying the Legislature to give us a recall
option. Another is paying attention to what actually will help
lessen crime-and get away from the dumbass notions pushed by the
Ledger and others that we have to solve all the crime downtown
BEFORE we really push for a downtown Renaissance, instead of
recognizing that eco-devo will help crime conditions. Anyway, I
could go on, but I'll be publishing more on all of this, so I'll
save it.
Donna! Fish! Stewart! pike! Jackson is a small town
after all.
Speaking as someone who bought into the Melton idea growing up in
this city, like the vast majority of Jacksonians did, I would
suggest that Melton got his "folk hero" reputation during the 18
years Donna was not here. This would explain why she had a force
field, so to speak. I suspect that if she were here during those
years, her assessment of Melton's folk hero status would be very
different--though of course I have no way of knowing for
sure.
There's a lot of talk of how the election of Melton proves this
about Jackson voters or proves that about Jackson voters. Jackson
is a formerly majority-white city that became majority-black, a
formerly white-led city that has become black-led, so when we say
"the people of Jackson need to learn [x]," with the implicit
message that black voters need to learn [x] from whites, there is a
dynamic there that tends to develop that I don't think is very
productive.
What we need are more checks and balances so that when our
municipality elects the wrong person--which can happen to any
municipality in any part of the country at any time--there is a
better way out. Whether we accomplish this system of checks and
balances by decreasing the power of the mayor relative to that of
the City Council, or by introducing a recall process, is a matter
best discussed in the halls of the Mississippi State Legislature.
But it needs to be discussed. The election of Frank Melton has, to
borrow a term from Stalin, heightened the contradiction. We now
know the dangers of unchecked executive power on the municipal
level, and we need to enact long-term policy reform to prevent this
from happening again.
We also need better tools. Donna's AAN paper, the Jackson Free
Press, is certainly one of those better tools. The Mississippi
Link, which Donna mentions in the article above, is another such
tool. There also needs to be, and I'm sure has been, some
soul-searching in the offices of the Clarion-Ledger, the broadcast
media affiliates, and even (dare I suspect) some sectors of the
national press. Nonprofit groups also need to do a more aggressive
job in serving as watchdogs. And of course all of us could stand to
be more vigilant, more skeptical, more cynical, as good Bill Maher
might say.
But in the final analysis, this says less about Jackson than it
does about what inevitably happens when the stars line up in the
wrong way, we get the Mayor from Hell, and there's no system of
checks and balances in place, no accountability system, to protect
us. So the long-term solution needs to be policy reform, in Jackson
and in every other city that does not have proper channels of
accountability.
Other cities have a lesson to learn from this, I believe, and folks
who read about Frank Melton and walk away with the lesson of "Gee,
Jackson sucks" are missing an important point, from where I sit.
Remember the inscription on the statue of Ozymandias: "Look upon my
works, ye mighty, and despair." Or to put it another way: There is
no city in America that is not potentially one election away from a
Frank Melton, so be sure you know what to do if this happens in
your city.
Kudos on a good article, Donna, and on some bold and gutsy coverage
dating back close to three years now.
ladd wrote- "The media blackout on him has gone for decades now.
I know that, and it was clear that our coverage wasn't going to
sway this deep-seated problem...."
Earlier you said that you knew very little about Melton upon your
return to Mississippi in 2001. Now you're saying you were aware of
the media blackout on him that has gone on for decades.
Are you sure you didn't know about Melton prior to moving to
Mississippi?
No, I didn't know about him when I was gone from Mississippi. I
left in 1983; he came here in 1984. The way I now understand the
media blackout on his weaknesses so well is by research, research,
research. There is plenty out there on him-for instance,
non-questioning news stories about how he "brought in" young
criminals who were wanted for drug crimes and murder, pulled police
friend off their beats to help him, and then managed how they were
going to be turned over. In other ways, he has gotten in the
police's way for a long, long time. But you wouldn't believe the
news stories-written as if there was nothing unusual about this TV
executive from Texas getting these boys to turn themselves into him
first (and, thus, according to prosecutors, tainting a lot of the
evidence. I'm not saying on purpose.)
Meantime, the police chief was pissed about this as he should have
been, but The Clarion-Ledger went after him repeatedly for saying
something that he did not say (that crime was just a "perception";
the last chief had actually warned media and residents that the
perception of crime being unstoppable, as pushed by a
sensationalist media, works against us, and he was taken terribly
and stupidly out of context. Repeatedly.)
It's truly remarkable to go back and piece together Melton's media
trail here. There is so much more that I don't have time or space
to get into on this forum.
As for the assertion that I have a "force field" toward Melton
because I was gone for 18 years of his halycon "folk hero" times,
well, that's not true and wouldn't make sense to anyone who
actually knows me personally. I've been a journalist for a long
time, and I look at public servants through journalistic eyes, both
to examine the positive and the negative being said about them.
I've seen Melton's old "Bottom Line" segments in my research, and I
assure you that the first thing I would have done (as I started
doing during his campaign in January 2005) was start asking him for
sources and factchecking his assertions, especially those
lambasting various law-enforcement officials (remember the MBN memo
that he leaked to The Clarion-Ledger that they published without
knowing whether the assertions against agents were true?). Had my
paper been here much earlier, the media climate would most
assuredly been different toward Mr. Melton. We would have asked him
hard questions (like about the halfway house he runs) because
that's, well, how journalism is supposed to work. I'm not easily
charmed, and especially by obvious demagogues; I would have always
taken the same approach we've taken with him, in other words.
And let's not take away credit from all the people who did live
here all the years who questioned him and tried to raise concerns
about him at various points, including during the campaign. These
people weren't fooled by the "folk hero" facade, either. But that's
where the media blackout on Melton (and friends) is so, so
important; the stories are rampant about how media outlets wouldn't
touch anything remotely negative about him over the years, much as
The Clarion-Ledger wouldn't report the Ridgeway demolition until
after we reported it and they had no choice.
I should also add that much of the media in Jackson is now in a mea
culpa phase on it, even if they're not saying that in print or on
the air. I've been on panels and in personal conversations with
editors and top managers from most of the print and TV outlets in
town, who have admitted outright that they dropped the ball on
Melton all these years. So it's not like I'm just pulling this out
of my ... you know.
Melton had it good for a while. He ran WLBT with a former FBI agent
by his side to protect him, and media throughout the city was
afraid to criticize him all those years. But all wild parties
eventually come to a close.
"There is plenty out there on him-for instance, non-questioning
news stories about how he "brought in" young criminals who were
wanted for drug crimes and murder, pulled police friend off their
beats to help him, and then managed how they were going to be
turned over."
Eventhough you didn't know about Frank, this is proof that the
voting people of Jackson did, but voted him in anyway. He's been
doing this for years. I knew about this years ago. I told a lot of
people about this and it fell on deaf ears since they loved Frank
from his "The Bottom Line" grandstanding on WLBT.
Thanks for posting this. now let's see the Melton supporters argue
the validity of this and why still, he was voted into office.
"No, I didn't know about him when I was gone from Mississippi. I
left in 1983; he came here in 1984. "
I see. understood.
....snapshot-
Frank was tough on kiddie criminals back then. he helped them get
their lives back on track for the most part. Now I can't say where
those kids are now or how they turned out, but it was his
intenetion to help them out. Can't knock him for that.
pinestraw, I'll tell you how they turned out:
1. most are dead
2. some are in jail.
3. the rest are on his payroll with impunity.
There is no evidence to support the "most are dead" claim. I
read an article in the Link earlier this year about one of the
at-risk youths who had just graduated from college--one of more
than 150.
With respect to the fact that Donna was not here during the 1980s
and 1990s but seems to know with remarkable certainty how she would
have reacted to things if she were, I can only say that from the
perspective of social psychology, that's something of a
pseudeoscientific claim. None of us, including Donna Ladd, operate
independently of our social environment.
The people of Jackson are not stupid, and they made a mistake that
any electorate could have made. Look at who we have for a
president, for God's sake.
There's nothing "pseudeoscientific" about it. Melton's schtick
is just not one that would have stuck to me. I guess the argument
would be that he was so good at it that even a journalist who
routinely asks for sources and backup for serious accusations and
odd statements of "fact," and who has always wholeheartedly
believed in the Constitution, would have been lulled into
not applying those same standards to Frank Melton for some
reason because he talked a good, charming game.
Yes, I can say with certainty that I would not have done that. That
doesn't make me any better than anyone else; it means that I do,
and would have done, my job with Melton in the 1990s just
as I have done in the last few years. Perhaps basic reporting-and
the megaphone effect on other media-would have changed the
accepting/adoring climate toward him then just as it's done since
2005.
I've never said the electorate here was/is stupid. I have said,
repeatedly, that the media and other people with the knowledge and
ability and forums (including various law-enforcement folks) did
not share enough facts about him with the public so that people
could use cold, hard facts to rise above the hero worship before it
reached such Teflon proportions. That withholding of facts is
remarkably easily proved by research, so I have no need to belabor
this further here. As I said, I will be laying out all of that in
more detail soon as we explore in more depth how we got to this
point, as we must do to make sure that such a long-brewing calamity
does not happen here again.
I just don't know that any media spends all that much time
investigating the lives of private citizens, and that's all Melton
was prior to 2005. To be honest, if you'd asked me prior to the MBN
appointment if I thought he'd ever run for mayor or any other
political office, I wouldn't have just said no. I'd have laughed.
It was so completely inconsistent with his persona.
If Melton never actually did help kids, never actually did much
philanthropy, and so on and so forth, then I certainly look forward
to reading your exposé on that. It'll be one for the ages. But
assuming he did do those things, it's not hard to see how he'd win
the mayor's office. People see a commitment to the community, they
see a guy with executive management experience going back decades,
and they think "Gee, he'd be a good mayor."
And it blew up in our faces this time, but Jackson being a city of
176,000 people, that's basically how mayors tend to be selected.
The only exception I can think of in recent years is Kane Ditto,
because he was technically a state representative first.
But what did Harvey Johnson have in his background that showed us
he wouldn't go nuts? The Mississippi Institute for Small Towns, a
master's degree from the University of Cincinnati, and a previous,
failed bid for mayor. He was something of an unknown quantity when
we elected him in 1997, too, and he turned out pretty well from
where I sit.
I don't anticipate that we're going to know everything we need to
know about every mayor we elect. New media being what it is, we
have access to more information than we used to have--and I don't
mean to sell the work you're doing on this short, because it's
great work--but the key to preventing this from happening again,
from where I sit, would be to make sure checks and balances are in
place to limit the power of the mayor should that person get out of
hand. Unchecked executive power is something we're becoming more
conscious of as a national problem, and it's a city problem,
too.
"There is no evidence to support the "most are dead" claim. I
read an article in the Link earlier this year about one of the
at-risk youths who had just graduated from college--one of more
than 150.
Speaking from a first hand account and logical standpoint and not
of speculation as your statement suggests, I'd say most are dead,
some are jail, etc.
Melton was in Jackson during the "crack days" when drug related
deaths happened often in and around Jackson. Check the murder rates
of Jackson between the years 1984-1995. most of them at one time or
another was mentored by Melton. or at least "jacked up" by him when
he was a narc.
".. just don't know that any media spends all that much time
investigating the lives of private citizens, and that's all Melton
was prior to 2005."
This statement is incorrect. Melton had a major stake in WLBT,
which made him a public servant, NOT a private citizen. He did
things such as ranting on his "The Bottom Line" segments after the
news, to mentoring at-risk youth. So sir, with all due respect, you
don't know what you're talking about.
I was an at-risk youth. My parents threatened to send me to Piney
Woods, Oakley training school AND Frank Melton. My only bargaining
chip that I could throw at them to keep from sending me was to ask
to volunteer/attend the NYSP Summer youth program held at Jackson
State and also attend the Capital Street Boys Club. and BOY am I
glad I was thinking to do those things and not have to deal with
Frank Melton. I would've probably ended up like many of my friends.
dead or in jail.
"If Melton never actually did help kids, never actually did much
philanthropy, and so on and so forth, then I certainly look forward
to reading your exposé on that. It'll be one for the ages. But
assuming he did do those things, it's not hard to see how he'd win
the mayor's office. People see a commitment to the community, they
see a guy with executive management experience going back decades,
and they think "Gee, he'd be a good mayor." "
And this is what I just don't understand. Because so many families
have been detroyed due to the influx of crack, which made robberies
go up too. how in the world could we be so blind to elect a guy who
was in the middle of this epidemic and did more harm than good. I
just can't..understand it.
"I don't anticipate that we're going to know everything we need
to know about every mayor we elect. "
This is why you have Town Hall Meetings and debates between
candidates to find out. geeesh.
I suspect that I'm younger than you, but you appear to be so
clueless it's not even funny.
snapshot -
I have to agree on those points you made. I had to send my son to
NYSP to keep him out of trouble too, although he still got into
some. It was better than letting him sit at home while I was at
work during the summer months.
Only one factual correction: Melton has operated in the public
sphere in Jackson since the 1980s when then-Mayor Dale Danks
allowed him on the youth beat, so to speak, allowing him to drive
around with police officers to "help" young people. Then his
friends like Frank Bluntson, then head of the Juvenile Detention
Center, and Youth Court Judge Karen Gilfoy sent young men and
children to live with him, even though he was not a certified
foster parent and sometimes over the complaints of their parents.
That is, he has been "assigned" young people for years by his
friends on the taxpayer rolls.
All of that may have been done with the utmost of good intentions,
but it certainly does not support the argument that Melton was not
in the public sphere and did not warrant scrutiny by the
media.
This is all fact, sitting in the public domain for people to know,
discuss and consider. Bits of it was reported years ago by young
reporters who are now editors at The Clarion-Ledger and higher-ups
at TV stations. But when it was reported, it was reported
ever-so-gingerly, and then the stories went away never to be seen
again.
There is no argument that anyone can make to me that explains away
why this was not an issue for the public to monitor-it is simply
mind-boggling to say that he was a private figure before 2005 and,
thus, the media should be excused for not paying closer attention
to what he was doing. But such reasoning does explain, I suppose,
how the public ended up so ignorant about him by the time he ran
for mayor. As I heard two different editors from our daily
newspaper say in forums, they didn't report more about Melton
during the campaign because people didn't want to know the whole
story. And that was one of the more shocking statements I've ever
heard journalists make. Why not go be a trial attorney, or a
lobbyist, and make real money if that is your attitude?
People can't know what they don't know, or have access to. And they
were not told enough information about Melton for decades here.
It's that simple.
"There is no argument that anyone can make to me that explains
away why this was not an issue for the public to monitor-it is
simply mind-boggling to say that he was a private figure before
2005 and, thus, the media should be excused for not paying closer
attention to what he was doing."
Of course there isn't. the voting public in Jackson knew very well
of Melton, his attitude and his antics. I was a kid when I first
met him and found out so I know full-well people like Tom knew.
what you have here is a bad case of amnesia when it comes to being
honest and telling the truth. that's all. People do it all the
time, especially in Jackson.
"But such reasoning does explain.... how the public ended up so
ignorant about him by the time he ran for mayor.....two different
editors from our daily newspaper say in forums, they didn't report
more about Melton during the campaign because people didn't want to
know the whole story. And that was one of the more shocking
statements I've ever heard journalists make."
Shocking?...Oh you just wait..wait until it's time to oust Melton.
You'll have a treasure of things to peg him on.
On thing about Jackson voters is clear. when their candidate
doesn't pan out or makes a horrible mayor, no one can seem to claim
they voted for him.
Donna writes:
As I heard two different editors from our daily newspaper say in forums, they didn't report more about Melton during the campaign because people didn't want to know the whole story. And that was one of the more shocking statements I've ever heard journalists make. Why not go be a trial attorney, or a lobbyist, and make real money if that is your attitude?
I can't imagine that the C-L would think its readers would care
about the whole story of a private citizen's life--that's really
kind of tabloid stuff--but if Melton was on the youth beat, then of
course anything he was doing in that capacity would have been fair
game.
The C-L wasn't vigilant enough about Melton in 2005, no question,
and I'm sure members of the editorial board are kicking themselves
over it.
snapshot of reality, I don't know Melton personally. Like most
people in Jackson, I know him by reputation. He had a good
reputation, more from word of mouth than from the media. I can't
speak to whether or not he deserved that reputation. For my part
(and this can be easily documented by posts I made on Donna's forum
and others at the time), I voted for Harvey Johnson in the primary
but Frank Melton in the general election.
--- "I don't know Melton personally. Like most people in
Jackson, I know him by reputation. He had a good reputation, more
from word of mouth than from the media. I can't speak to whether or
not he deserved that reputation."
for the record, I love Stamp's burgers. but I wouldn't vote the
owner into the mayor's just off his good reputation.
"For my part (and this can be easily documented by posts I made on
Donna's forum and others at the time), I voted for Harvey Johnson
in the primary but Frank Melton in the general election."
So what "good" did you learn about Melton prior to voting for him
in the primary? and how did you learn of it?
Just asking, because if the left hand doesn't know what the right
hand is doing ,then the problems of Jackson go way deeper than the
mayor and nonchalant media not reporting the news. It actually
pierces to the heart of flatout ignorance and loathing by the
people.
Are you saying that the majority vote(black) was ignorant and
loathing in their quest to find the answers?
snapshot, I've read your post several times and I can't figure
out what it is that you're trying to say. "Loathing" means "feeling
an intense dislike or disgust for." Do I believe that I and other
Jacksonians who voted for Melton were ignorant and hateful? Not
especially, no.
With respect to the primary, I voted for Johnson, not
against Melton. I said at the time that I thought all
three candidates were excellent, but that I was sticking with
Johnson because I felt he was the best mayor we'd ever had. When he
was defeated, I picked Melton over Whitlow--not only because I had
a very favorable view of Melton but also because, Melton belonging
to the same party as Johnson, I figured he would be less inclined
to fire Johnson's excellent staff. We all know how that went, but
there was no way of predicting it at the time.
I think (as I have been saying throughout this thread) that a
certain amount of this comes with the territory when you're voting
for an elected official. You never know everything about a given
candidate. Melton looked really good on paper, sounded really good
on TV, and had a really good reputation. Voters picked him. It went
badly. These things happen in a democracy, and I don't think it
reflects poorly on voters at all.
"You never know everything about a given candidate. Melton
looked really good on paper, sounded really good on TV, and had a
really good reputation. Voters picked him. It went badly. These
things happen in a democracy, and I don't think it reflects poorly
on voters at all."
I've never been one to vote on anything without knowing the facts.
But I'll take into consideration that you assumed, as did the rest
who voted for Melton, that he would do a god job without knowing
for a fact that he could do the job, but just on his persona on
TV.
It's times like these that harken back to the Jim Crow era and
makes me realize that not only do our citizens not mind whose in
office, they actually don't care.
Ladd-
When you hear responses like this, do you ever think your paper and
it's news will ever cut through? I'm sure you get depressed a lot
when writing about Mississippi.
snapshot writes:
But I'll take into consideration that you assumed, as did the rest who voted for Melton, that he would do a god job without knowing for a fact that he could do the job, but just on his persona on TV.
And we knew Dale Danks, Kane Ditto, and Harvey Johnson "could do
the job" before they actually became incumbents how, exactly?
Whenever you elect a new officeholder, you're taking a calculated
risk.
You're doing a great job of following what seems to have become the
party line on Melton--e.g., that his election somehow proves that
the people of Jackson are not intelligent enough to vote--which is
certainly the view that many seem to hold on Donna's site, and the
impression that national coverage of the Melton debacle might give
observers. But if you're actually from here, you should know it's
not that simple.
--e.g., that his election somehow proves that the people of
Jackson are not intelligent enough to vote--which is certainly the
view that many seem to hold on Donna's site,
Where in God's green acre did you come up with such
absurdity!?!
I, for one, say repeatedly that the people of Jackson never got
enough information from the media and others to know enough about
Melton's background to have known what/who they were really
electing. You keep trying to morph that bizarrely into an unfounded
accusation that the JFP is saying that the "people of Jackson"
aren't intelligent enough to vote?!? Please. There is nothing
logical, or accurate, there. You're being offensive for reasons
that are beyond me.
Snapshot, writing about Mississippi does not depress me. It's my
home state, and I love it and her people, and that's why I hold the
state to higher standards than many others do. I don't have a
bigotry of low expectations toward my state, and I believe we have
to band together to overcome our problems, our inferiority complex
and to talk back to outsiders who try to treat us like idiots.
Excuses don't work; information and action do. There is corruption
and apathy and idiocy everywhere. And the corporate media problem
is all over the country now. I'm taking my stand in my home state,
but that does not mean that Mississippi is any worse than other
states. We just have conditions that magnify our problems a
bit.
In other words, there is *nowhere* I'd rather the fight the good
fight then right here at home. I had to run around the country for
a few years to find that out. But I'm so glad I did. Now I'm loaded
for bear in my determination to fight for my state.
"You're doing a great job of following what seems to have become
the party line on Melton--e.g., that his election somehow proves
that the people of Jackson are not intelligent enough to
vote--which is certainly the view that many seem to hold on Donna's
site, and the impression that national coverage of the Melton
debacle might give observers. But if you're actually from here, you
should know it's not that simple."
I was just about to query if YOU were actually from here.
I was born and raised in Jackson and still here. there's nothing
you can tell me about how things are in this city. And frankly,
I've come to the conclusion over the years that the people of
Jackson DO have an issue when it comes to picking a good Mayor for
this once great city, especially when they are not informed
properly. This city was one of the first town's in the south where
travellers, preachers,philanthropists, and settlers all stopped
during the age of American pioneering. Jackson was not some small
outpost to let your horse take a dump and keep going. No, Jackson
was well on it's way to being like Houston, Memphis, Chicago and
other great cities that were once bustling towns with a vision.
Jackson, over the years saw a lot of flight by the original
settlers of this town and an influx of "wannabe" Jacksonians which
has caused the city to slow down in terms of growth because most of
the progressive thinkers moved out west(California, Texas),
North(Memphis, St. Louis, Chicago), East(Atlanta, New York) and has
basically left a remnant of what could have been, with the good ol'
boys taking full control of the land and city government and a
confuse/uninformed citizenry taking the brunt of the madness.
So don't tell ME about Jackson, I Know Jackson.
Ladd-
After you get enough of exposing Melton's underachievements, I
would love for you to tackle the issue of why the Banks in this
city give minorities such a hard time when it comes to securing
loans for small businesses. I'm sure you'll get half the town's
attention of why things are the way they are here.
"In other words, there is *nowhere* I'd rather the fight the
good fight then right here at home. I had to run around the country
for a few years to find that out. But I'm so glad I did. Now I'm
loaded for bear in my determination to fight for my state."
I hear you. I was just being facetious.
I like exposing falsehoods around this town too. keep it up.
Tom Head,
Could you give me one example of anything good Melton has done in
the realm of politics that would warrant voting for him for mayor
either in the primary or general election?
I tend to agree with snapshot here. why wouldn't you want to know
the background of whose going to be your Mayor?
I have to agree with you there snapshot. Information is power.
and those that know, don't share the information and pretend to be
none the wiser when exposed.
Reminds me of the Senator Craig incident
lol
Thanks, all. Melton does take a lot of our time, admittedly, but
there are SO many stories ignored here that we hope to shine more
daylight on as we go forward, now that we've forced the spotlight
of scrutiny to shine on Melton. Lingering discrimination against
minorities by institutions is certainly one of them. It kills me,
for instance, that our black employees have to jump through more
hoops to do their banking than our white employees.
And of course you're right, Winter. It is the primary role of the
media to watchdog both public servants and those who insert
themselves into a role in the government, elected or not,
especially when it comes to the welfare of children. The saddest
part is that so many people (white and black) in this city turned
their head for many years on Melton's style of "mentoring" because
he talked a good game, and that is what the media fed the public.
Meantime, the needs of some of our city's weakest citizens were
ignored.
I was talking to a former ardent supporter of Melton yesterday, who
was telling me that he just didn't know the truth about him, and he
blamed the media for his being misinformed. There is a huge
difference between an electorate being "misinformed" because
information was hidden from them and being unintelligent. I would
never say the second, and any attempt to paint my efforts that way
are dishonest.
Jackson is filled with many intelligent people-and they were
snookered by a power structure and a media system that has
protected Melton for many years. That is simply fact, and at this
point, people left and right are realizing it.
Oh, and I'm with Winter. I looked hard and could not find a single reason to vote for Melton. But, as I said, I've never been easily sucked in by empty sound bites.
I stayed in Jackson after graduating from Belhaven and although
I miss living in Boston, I wouldn't move. something about the fresh
air and quietness about Jackson that I fell in in love with.
I can't begin to feel how snapshot feels, but I can tell he has
some issues about how this city has fared over the years. I can
only hope it gets better because I want to continue living in
Jackson.
Just send Melton to Philidelphia,PA. We have a special way of gettin rid of corrupt cops.
"There is a huge difference between an electorate being
"misinformed" because information was hidden from them and being
unintelligent."
Having listened to my parents and the parents of others, along with
other people in high positions of power concerning the plight of
Jackson over many years, I'd have to say it's 10/60/30.
10% intelligent who know what needs to be done, don't make "blind"
decisions without in-depth facts and work to get results...
60% ignorant, who could care less as long as their
weekly/bi-weekly/monthly check is not interrupted or their posh
neighborhood is not affected...
then there's this huge 30% elderly class in Jackson, who have been
here since they were born who just want things to be better but
most of them are too old to fight for change and just want to live
in peace.
that last 30% is the crowd Melton targeted with his "Fear" campaign
of high crime and thugs running loose.
We have to work on that 60% crowd to get any real results in
Jackson going forward.
To Tom Head,
could you answer winter's questions please?
I also would like to know.
Snapshot, why don't you run for Mayor? You seem to have the
city's issues on your sleeve. Maybe you can fix it and bring about
a Renaissance in Jackson?
I drive to New Orleans from Memphis often but rarely do I stop in
Jackson, if only for gas/restroom. Now my interest is piqued as to
what's really going on down there.
LOL...I TOLD YOU PEOPLE OF JACKSON A LOOONG TIME AGO THAT FRANK MELTON WAS NOT THE RIGHT PERSON TO BE MAYOR OF JACKSON, BUT NOOOO, YOU FOOLS DIDN'T LISTEN AND GOT WHAT YOU VOTED FOR...A LUNATIC!!...HAHAHA....GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR SUFFERING BECAUSE YOU DESERVE EVERY LITTLE BIT OF IT. DON'T CRY ABOUT IT NOW MS.LADD. YOUR STUPID ASSES SHOULD'VE LISTENED TO THE SCREAMS IN THE WILDERNESS...AND I HOPE HE WRECKS THE CITY OF JACKSON FINANCIALLY. I'M GLAD I MOVED OUT OF THAT SHITHOLE RIGHT AFTER HE WAS ELECTED BECAUSE KNEW WHAT WAS COMING.. YOU CLOWNS WILL LEARN ONE DAY, BUT MAYBE NOT...HAHA... AS MALCOLM X WOULD SAY "THE CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST". HAHAHA
Imagine that. Donna Ladd complaining about dishonesty. What is that saying about the pot calling the kettle?
Example, KC?
It's not about crying, Who Cares. It's about reporting the
facts.
to Who Cares -
Frankly I'm glad you moved out of Jackson. One less uneducated
criminal roaming our streets.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245