From the June 2004 issue
"Consider the effects of a right to reply law. A newspaper...could surrender its editorial prerogatives and allow politicians and bureaucrats free access to its pages....Or, it could simply refuse to cover controversial public figures."
-- Robert Poole Jr., "No 'Right' to Reply"
"In almost every study of social affairs, scholars seek after 'the causes' of behavior -- but in terms of their metaphysical viewpoint, they must exclude people themselves."
-- Tibor Machan, "Science, Skinner, and Human Affairs"
"Businessmen are both victims and victimizers, legitimate recipients of praise -- for where would we be economically without such people -- and yet...legitimate recipients of scorn...for where would we be if some had not willingly participated in...corporate socialism?"
-- D.T. Armentano, "Petroleum, Politics, & Prices"
" [Paul Goodman's] political philosophy has always been fusionist -- uniting much of what is best in conservatism and anarchism....He devised no rigid ideology, but blended the various tendencies of his thinking into a social wisdom that was both innovative and traditional."
-- Ian Young, "Paul Goodman: American Anarchist"
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.8.10 @ 3:21AM|#
gdgd