The legal landscape for transgender cases has changed since 2023.
Justice Gorsuch twice referenced Justice Harlan's constitutional law lecture on Wong Kim Ark.
I suspect many lawyers use AI, but now they will be even more hesitant to admit it.
After Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a claim for a purely "aesthetic injury" should fail.
The executive branch sacrificed its power to the Supreme Court, yet gained virtually nothing.
The 8-1 case was argued on October 7, and decided on March 31.
"A Conversation with Matthew J. Kacsmaryk and James C. Ho"
Richard Re poses thought provoking questions about a Scalia counterfactual on Earth 2.0.
The Blaine Amendments purported to do exactly what Town of Greece rejected: permit "generic" expressions of religion but not expressions of specific religious beliefs.
Never wait until it is too late.
The 2000 and 2020 elections are still on the Justices' minds.
After the Supreme Court grants an emergency stay, the plaintiffs dismiss the case with prejudice.
The top four teams announce to the championship round at the National Archives.
A wide-ranging interview between the Chief Justice and Judge Rosenthal at the Baker Institute.
Roberts suspects that if he was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit at the age of 37, he probably "wouldn't have ended up" as Chief Justice.
Justice Blackmun echoed the Population Bomb's concerns about "population growth," and Ehrlich thought Roe supported "compulsory abortion."
"As Judge Kenneth K. Lee wisely warned, judges of the inferior courts should 'not be seduced by the temptation of judicial resistance,' lest they inch towards an inferior 'imperial judiciary.'"
Why is it worse to use problematic language to describe something than to acknowledge that thing is actually problematic?
"Is a holiday-themed community footrace 'recreation'?"
30 members of the Ninth Circuit write to disagree.
Why can lower courts issue unexplained rulings on the emergency docket, but not SCOTUS?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks