Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Pornography

Why Porn Industry Legal Experts are Terrified of a GOP President

The porn industry "will suffer greatly if a Republican is in the White House."

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 1.21.2016 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | AVN Adult Entertainment Expo/Facebook
(AVN Adult Entertainment Expo/Facebook)
AVN Adult Entertainment Expo/Facebook

"If a Republican is elected this year, all bets are off," said J. Michael Murray, speaking Wednesday from a panel of porn-industry lawyers at the 2016 AVN Adult Entertainment Expo—all of whom seemed to agree that a GOP president would be bad, bad news for the business. 

Specifically, the panelists—including Murphy, a partner with Cleveland, Ohio, appellate law firm Berkman, Gordon, Murray & DeVan—worry that a President Trump or Rubio would mean more investigations and prosecutions under U.S. criminal code 2257, which governs record-keeping requirements for all sorts of pornography producers. Murray is currently representing the Free Speech Coalition (FSC), a trade group for the adult-entertainment and pleasure-products industry, in a challenge to these requirements, which say that any sexually-explicit content producer or distributor must "create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed" or face up to 10 years in prison.

FSC has been fighting the regulations since they took effect in 2005. In 2014, it succeeded in getting the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to say that requiring producers to make 2257 records accessible to law enforcement for any reason, without a warrant, was a violation of producers' Fourth Amendment rights. 

Under the Obama administration, said Paul Cambria Jr., there have been far fewer people in the porn industry being "prosecuted, harassed," and intimidated by federal prosecutors vis a vis the record-keeping requirement. But Cambria—a partner at Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria who has represented Larry Flynt, DMX, and Marilyn Manson—worries that "if a Republican becomes president we'll see all the [obscenity-related] laws that we haven't enforced in a long, long time enforced." 

Even if they don't care much on a personal level, Republican politicians will always crack down on porn to "throw that bone" to their evangelical base, said Allan Gelbard, a California-based First Amendment and intellectual property lawyer. Gelbard drafted legislation on behalf of the Free Speech Coalition that later became state law and allows businesses whose records are seized under a search warrant the possibility to obtain copies of the records through the court. 

The panelists also emphasized that it's not just section 2257 they would worry about under a Republican administration—there will also be Supreme Court justices and federal judges to appoint. Overall, the porn industry "will suffer greatly if a Republican is in the White House," Murray said.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Government Poisoned Flint's Water—So Stop Blaming Everyone Else

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PornographySex WorkObscenityPoliceCriminal JusticeElection 2016Republican Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (138)

Latest

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Georgia Man Who Spent 6 Weeks in Jail on a Kidnapping Charge Says He Was Helping a Falling Child

Autumn Billings | 5.9.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!