Moving Forward on Military Intervention in Mali

As noted on Reason 24/7, the United Nations Security Council unanimously approved a French-backed military intervention in Mali. The plan is for regional ECOWAS forces to enter in the north to quell a Tuareg rebellion turned Islamist insurgency. Al-Qaeda is, naturally, suspected of involvement.

Though the Tuareg are indigenous to northern Mali, where the insurgency is spreading, the country was considered by USAID as “one of the most enlightened democracies in Africa” as recently as earlier this year. The collapse of the Qaddafi regime in Libya, with help from the West, created an influx of Libyan Tuareg fighters, who Qaddafi had kept in his employ, as well as Islamists fresh from the experience of toppling a government in Tripoli. The Tuareg rebels in the north declared independence in April, a coup followed, and elections scheduled for later that month never happened.

As a former French colony, the situation in Mali’s been closely monitored in France, where the recently elected Socialist president has been at the forefront of a push for military intervention, sending surveillance drones last month. France and the U.S. (because Al-Qaeda!) have also been pressuring Algeria to back an intervention in Mali. U.S. officials have been visiting all year long, with Hillary Clinton herself going in October.

While the U.S. is projecting a limited role in the now seemingly imminent intervention in Mali, it did confirm earlier this month that it was working closely with West African countries in planning the actual military operation. A few days later UN Ambassador Susan Rice reportedly told other UN-based officials the plans for intervention were “crap,” the fear being the ECOWAS countries (led by Nigeria) did not have the military resources or experience for a successful intervention. The stage seems set for deeper involvement in a military intervention moving forward not just by France but also the U.S.

In related news, the last of the French troops returned from Afghanistan today, with the French president declaring “mission accomplished.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Hugh Akston||

    I don't see why France shouldn't intervene in North Africa. When has that ever gone wrong for them?

  • Raven Nation||

    Plus, if France intervened, Americans could get to accuse them of being neo-Imperialists for a while.

  • Redmanfms||

    They never stopped being Imperialists, and their military interventions all over Africa have been ongoing.

  • GILMORE||

    the country was considered by USAID as “one of the most enlightened democracies in Africa”

    ....the fact that i laughed out loud at that is sad.

    I was going to make a joke which discussed the 'best neighborhood in East St. Louis', or mentioned Newark or Detroit, but then was like.... racist... stop that.

  • waaminn||

    Gotta like those guns dude. Wow.

    www.GlobalAnon.tk

  • Robert||

    Hard to get worked up about a country whose name sounds like your aunt's.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement