Was the Assassination of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya a Second 9/11?

A report in The Independent relying partially on anonymous sources suggests the United States had warnings about the Tuesday’s attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and the assault on the embassy in Cairo:

According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and "lockdown", under which movement is severely restricted.

The Independent paints a crisis as a result of the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, reporting sensitive documents going missing, including lists of Libyans working with the U.S. and some related to oil contracts. None of the safe houses around the country are considered safe anymore. A link to Al-Qaeda is suspected:

Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.

There is growing belief that the attack was in revenge for the killing in a drone strike in Pakistan of Mohammed Hassan Qaed, an al-Qa'ida operative who was, as his nom-de-guerre Abu Yahya al-Libi suggests, from Libya, and timed for the anniversary of the 11 September attacks.

Senator Bill Nelson, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said: "I am asking my colleagues on the committee to immediately investigate what role al-Qa'ida or its affiliates may have played in the attack and to take appropriate action."

And indeed, the brother of Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri claimed credit for coordinating the assault on the U.S. embassy in Cairo on Tuesday. Demonstrations at and around the embassy continued for a third day, and were joined by protests, many violent, from Tunisia to Bangladesh. Islamists stormed the German embassy in Sudan, whose capital saw thousands of demonstrators. Three were killed trying to assault the U.S. embassy there. White House press secretary Jay Carney insists the “volatile situation” in the region is due to the anti-Islamic film, apparently being investigated by the FBI, and possibly produced by a former government informant. The protests could not be construed as against “the United States write large or United States policy.”

Meanwhile on Fox News’ America Live, Paul Wolfowitz, one of the architects of the war in Iraq and the broader Bush doctrine toward the Middle East that Obama has rhetorically rejected while refashioning and adopting, said this was bad actors like Al-Qaeda trying for their own Arab spring. He even mentioned some of the excessive chest-thumping over the killing of bin Laden:

Frankly, I think there's been way too much boasting about killing Osama bin Laden, it was great to kill Osama bin Laden, but in a way you might almost speculate that these attacks, which were curiously timed for September 11th, are a message from Al-Qaeda that says, we're still around, and we'll still be around. The question people ask is will the Americans be around?

The message “take care America, we have 1.5 billion bin Ladens” was reportedly scrawled on the wall of the U.S. embassy in Cairo. Protesters in Afghanistan, where about four in ten residents believe Western forces are there to occupy the country or destroy Islam, want the maker of the film put on trial, finding some support in the contemporary American academia. Protesters in Pakistan, which has received more than $20 billion in foreign aid from the U.S. in the last decade, demanded diplomatic relations with Washington reviewed. 

The United States sent two warships to Libya and a Marine team to Yemen and embassies around the world have been put on “high alert.” Drones deployed over Benghazi have been fired at with anti-aircraft artillery by Islamist militants.  The body of Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, returned to a ceremony at  Andrews Air Force Base attended by President Obama, who called these “difficult days” but said the United States “will never retreat from the world… [and] will never stop working for the dignity and freedom that every person deserves,” and Hillary Clinton, who, echoing the president’s sentiment, callied the United States the greatest defender of human dignity in the world and both a good and great force in the world. 

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Hugh Akston||


  • Libertymike||

    Perhaps Senator Nelsen should be pushing his colleagues to look into what role the united states government may have played in the attack and that appropriate action be taken.

  • Lyle||

    What role would that be?

  • Jeff||

    Perhaps you ought to eat a dick.

  • Chris Yoder||

    Unfortunately, there is no longer an option to avoid further conflict. If the President had had the courage, foresight and wisdom to allow Libya to conduct an investigation, arrest the criminals responsible and prosecute them then there really would not be anything for the Muslims to be angry about in our reaction. Instead, he takes the bully approach and basically says that the Libyan government is incompetent to handle the situation and we must do it for them. Why can we not get a president with a brain?


    Are you retarded, or are you kidding?

  • hotsy totsy||

    But there isn't anything for Muslims to be angry about in the first place. You really think some youtube video is something to be murderously angry about?

    "See, you made me MAD when you wouldn't hand over your lunch money!"

  • Paul.||

    It looks like someone placed charges in the superstructure of that embassy...

  • Xenocles||

    Arguably it was the eleventh 9/11.

  • C. Anacreon||

    Yes, I've been wondering about that as well. IIRC there is some significance to 11 to the terrorists -- I believe either the Spain or London tube acts happened on 3/11. So while everyone worried about the tenth anniversary, it was really the 11th that was the big one for commemoration?

  • db||

    Foreign Policy misses the point on a "teachable moment" for Obama in this current crisis.

    I would prefer the "teachable moment" to be that in a free society, a state does not restrict its citizens' speech, and therefore bears no responsibility for it. There appears to be a fundamental difference in expectations between the West and Middle East on this subject. Extremists in the Middle East seem to expect the U.S. government to edit its citizens' opinions, and take action against it when it fails to do so. Whether or not organized religion, tainted as its history is with intolerance, murder, and repression, deserves respect, the freedom of speech of individuals should remain paramount.


  • ant1sthenes||

    No, on 9/11 thousands of Americans died, and a handful of Muslims looked like the lowest scumfuck assholes on Earth. On this 9/11, a handful of Americans died, but thousands of Muslims looked like psycho assholes.

    I am curious about reports that the ambassador's location was supposed to be secret. Seems like either our or the Libyan government has some unsanctioned leakers to be dealt with.

  • db||


  • db||



  • db||

    I fucking hate the squirrels.

  • Proprietist||

    The squirrels are benevolent dictators. You can criticize them freely, but don't you dare attempt an ampersand.

  • db||

    They can go pound s&

  • Proprietist||

    HOW?! HOW?! That's amazing, you rebel!

  • db||

    I can't get a legitimate, reasonalbe, well considered opinon paragraph but I can post an ampers&. Go figure.


  • C. Anacreon||

    At my work, just starting this week, I can read comments but the "reply to this" and "leave a comment" have vanished, both on IE and Chrome. Not sure if they need a Flash upgrade, or if there is an upgrade to the firewall sophisticated enough to prevent posting on a political site.

  • db||

  • db||

    THAT gets through.

  • sasob||

    Can it legitimately be called an assassination when the ambassador reportedly died of smoke inhalation?

  • Mike M.||

    Quit acting like a stupid idiot.

  • sasob||

    On the contrary, "stupid idiots" don't question anything, Mikey - they uncritically accept pretty much whatever crap they're fed. "'Taint no such thing as a stupid question - just stupid people who can't or won't answer them."

  • LTC(ret) John||

    And just WHY did he end up breathing smoke? HINT: people with impure motives may have done something to cause combustion... I hope you are just being sematically pedantic and nothing else.

  • sasob||

    You may call it semantic pedantry; however, I find that sloppy language often represents sloppy thinking at best and at times even outright exageration and dishonesty. The words assassination and murder imply an intention to kill, and assassination implies an intent to kill a specific, targeted individual. There is no doubt that the rioters were trying to kill our people and are responsible for their deaths, but were they specifically trying to kill the ambassador? Were they there to get him especially? The answer to that question is important, as it would indicate that something other than outrage over a Youtube video was the cause of all this.

  • db||

  • LTC(ret) John||

    You've gone stealth!

  • JimDee||

    No, because it's a safe bet that some Muslims were actually involved in the Libya debacle.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.