Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Reason.tv: Reason Foundation Co-Founder Manny Klausner on Ayn Rand
Manuel "Manny" Klausner was one of the founding partners in Reason Enterprises, which began publishing Reason magazine in 1971, three years after the publication's creation. He became editor in the summer of 1972 and a senior editor in June 1978. In 1978 he co-founded the Reason Foundation with Tibor Machan and Bob Poole. He remains on the board of the Reason Foundation today, is a stalwart supporter of the Federalist Society, and a libertarian lawyer extraordinaire.
"Rand is, I think, a very valuable resource in the movement for people who take liberty seriously," says Klausner. "When I was editor of Reason in the early 1970s, we got an article that was submitted that proposed a method for converting the world to libertarianism, and that was by going door-to-door and distributing to every household a copy of Atlas Shrugged. We rejected the article...but it was an example of the kind of impact Rand has had and continues to have on many many people."
Approximately six minutes. Interview by David Nott, camera by Alex Manning, and editing by Hawk Jensen.
This interview is part of the Reason.tv series Radicals For Capitalism: Celebrating the Ideas of Ayn Rand. Go here for more information, other videos, and related materials. Go here for downloadable versions of this video.
John Tagliaferro|11.4.09 @ 12:11PM|#
First Brian is on Rand now this guy. That corpse sure gets around!
|11.4.09 @ 12:31PM|#
Better way to convert the world to libertarianism is to take a page from Atlas Shrugged, and found Mulligan's Valley and invite all productive, libertarian people to live there and watch the world rot without them.
EFC|11.4.09 @ 12:36PM|#
Do you seriously believe that the capitalist are the only productive force in the world?
EFC|11.4.09 @ 3:34PM|#
Once they all move to your utopian society the cost of production would become so high and profits so low that they would eventually venture back in the "rotten" world to seek higher profits.
|11.4.09 @ 7:14PM|#
What makes you believe the best producers have the highest cost of production? What makes them the best producers is the low cost of production relative to the value they offer.
Further, profit means, to anyone that doesn't spend their afternoons huffing the farts of Krugman, that a net value has been gained in an interaction. Why wouldn't the most productive people receive a net value in their interaction with people whom are the best at producing? Again, if they are the best at producing they offer the best value proposition.
EFC|11.4.09 @ 8:04PM|#
Are you stupid? The more capitalist come into competition with each other the more they have to pay for rude produce and labor which means an increase in cost of production. They also would be force to sell must cheaper if they hope to keep their customers thus reducing their profits. Most capitalist wouldn't like this and thats why they lobby so hard for regulations and protectionism. You randroids seem to believe that the capitalist are some benevolent beings who love freedom and free markets when reality couldn't be farther from the truth. Most likely they would decline John Galts invitation.
Eileen|11.4.09 @ 7:59PM|#
Living here in NH, you'd never know it! We do manage to have a few reps that are Libertarians.
Eileen|11.4.09 @ 7:59PM|#
Living here in NH, you'd never know it! We do manage to have a few reps that are Libertarians.
Morris|11.4.09 @ 1:48PM|#
Going door to door distributing copies of Atlas Shrugged sounds like an example of complete lunacy to me. Klausner must be a moron.
|11.4.09 @ 2:12PM|#
Listen more closely to the interview; Klausner didnt propose
doing that, the idea came from some well-meaning loon who
submitted the idea to Reason Magazine.
I think Klausner related the anecdote to emphasize how strongly
Rand affects people.
Fiscal Meth|11.4.09 @ 2:43PM|#
I like this video and the guy seems pretty cool, but I have been really excited about the idea of libertarians discussing objectivism and that doesn't seem to be the direction this is going. Is this just going to be another case of people trying to discredit her ideas by campaigning against her personality. Whether or not she went batshit crazy with intellectual property suits or told people it is irrational to like Beethoven is old news and a distraction. Would we be mounting the same crusade if she had said that she approved of libertarians and hadn't accused us whim-worship? Enough with the character flaws and discuss how one philosophy of liberty compares to another.
Joel|11.4.09 @ 3:50PM|#
If she hadn't claimed to have the answer to life, the universe and everything, or ever prescribed how people should live (think, speak, listen to music...) you'd have a point. But since she did do those things, the way she applied her philosophy in her own life and the way it worked out for her is perfectly relevant to any Rand-related discussion.
smartass sob|11.4.09 @ 3:52PM|#
I remember that magazine issue Klausner talks about in the video - in fact, I still have a copy of it.
Fiscal Meth|11.4.09 @ 7:31PM|#
Okay so her philosophy applied in real life is disasterous. Why? That would be an interesting conversation. Where was she mistaken? If some of her ideas are important to libertarians then which ones are important to ignore?
Bobbs Merrill|11.5.09 @ 3:56PM|#
She had some good ideas, wrote some interesting books but many of
her characters were 1-dimensional especially in Atlas Shrugged.
Giving copies door to door is a silly idea. Few will read a 1,200
page book. And, yes I know it was not Klausner who proposed it.
The ideas that did not work in the real world were making her a
cult-like figure who was the only one who knew the real truth
about everything including what kind of literature, music, and
art it was ok to like. Or some of the odd things she did in her
personal life that hurt mainly her and the others involved. None
of these have anything to do with Libertarianism, they have to do
with her own logical musings on metaphysics, ethics, etc.
She never held a gun to anyone's head to make them agree with
her.
What makes a capitalist a capitalist? Do we mean anyone who is
above a certain level of management in a company? Or do we mean a
truly innovative person, an inventor, etc. like those portrayed
in Atlas Shrugged. There were plenty of "businessman" in the book
who were politically connected which is true of much of what goes
on today even if sometimes they have no choice. They have to do
it to stay in business or they are forced to take stimulus money
as a few of the banks were. That was a scene right out of Atlas
Shrugged. The funny thing is that if explained correctly, many
people would actually agree with each other. Many "liberal
democrats" (kind of an oxymoron) are against capitalism since
they think it will lead to a greater concentration of power and
an increase in income disparity and many who favor a free-market
believe that it is the system we have now with greater government
each year over the last 100 years that lead to concentration of
power and the huge increase we have had in the ratio of CEO pay
to lowest worker pay.
Many people really would like to see the same outcomes but they disagree completely on the means to get there.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245