Reason Magazine

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245

advertisements

Print|Email

Coming Tomorrow at Reason.tv: The Nanny of the Month For October 2009!

Tomorrow at Reason.tv, we'll announce the latest Nanny of the Month, the most annoying, frustrating busybody determined to mind your own business. So many possibilities, so little time!

While you wait, recall the September Nanny of the Month, which involved sex toys, the great state of Alabama, and a bunch of men wearing long robes:

|10.28.09 @ 8:10AM|

Highly misleading video. The Alabama Supreme Court didn't "ban sex toys." They upheld a ban that the Alabama Legislature passed. I don't think that that's exactly the same thing.

You might as well say that the Lochner Court worked bakers for more than ten hours a day and sixty hours in a week.

TP|10.28.09 @ 9:52AM|

0:45
More specifically, for upholding the state law...

|10.28.09 @ 11:10AM|

Yeah, but it's still overhyped at the beginning. And I still think it's silly to award them the Nanny of the Month title for upholding the law, at least in comparison to people who are pushing new laws and writing them.

|10.28.09 @ 11:11AM|

It's like blaming Japanese internment on the Supreme Court because of Korematsu, instead of on FDR et al.

|10.28.09 @ 8:16AM|

Even disagreeing with Gonzales v. Raich, I wouldn't describe it as "the Supreme Court banning cannabis." I would describe it as the Supreme Court upholding the ban.

Mango Punch|10.28.09 @ 8:42AM|

Reason, you're such a tease. You've got me all hot and bothered.

Social Worker|10.28.09 @ 9:51AM|

Where did Reason touch you? Show ne on the doll where Reason touched you.

|10.28.09 @ 9:59AM|

Can Fran Drescher win?

|10.28.09 @ 11:14AM|

Clearly the greatest Nanny ever.

|10.28.09 @ 11:23AM|

I'm not interested in your sick midget furry fantasies, Bunny.

|10.28.09 @ 10:25AM|

Would the severity of your sentence be directly proportional to the size of your dildo?

|10.28.09 @ 1:57PM|

Yes. Given that I have the Sugarfree model, I will be sentenced to merely hours of incarceration.

|10.28.09 @ 11:17AM|

Oh wow, Nanny of the month, that rules!

RT
www.hide-yer-stuff.se.tc

|10.28.09 @ 1:55PM|

You'll take my dildo out of Warty's dead cold hands.

Leave a Comment

advertisements