Tim Cavanaugh | September 24, 2009
Ronald Radosh claims there is new evidence that former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers ghostwrote President Obama's early memoir Dreams From My Father.
Ghostwriting as I understand it can take many forms. The literary issue is unimportant to Radosh and his source -- Ingram's magazine editor and Nazi hunter Jack Cashill -- who are concerned only with placing Ayers and fledgling author Barack Obama together. (Candidate Obama disowned Ayers and denied that they had an extensive relationship.)
I am interested in the literary issue. I read and enjoyed Dreams From My Father, and to the extent President Obama disappoints me (a very limited extent, as the Obama Administration has mostly been what I expected), he disappoints me by not being more like the character in the book.
Author Obama did not conceal his hard-left inclinations or his family's history of socialistic politics. But he repeatedly dramatized his own disaffection with the buttoned-down liberal consensus. (Maybe this is some thumbprint of the New Leftist Ayers?) The narrative is basically a series of epiphanies about the failures of parents, grandparents, male role models, friends and finally mentors, with the climax (which was a little anti-climactic) being the narrator's graduation from these many imperfect schools. I hadn't really expected, but had hoped, that the Barry who hung out with lesbian marxist poets and punk rock performance artists might take a little more of a burn-baby-burn attitude toward institutions that were, for example, sacred to both Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill.
President Obama, on the other hand, governs as the answer to the question historians have been puzzling over for decades: What if Adlai Stevenson had taken it back in '52? If Obama were the radical demagogue I keep hearing he is, he'd probably be more relevant. Consensus politics have never been deader, yet Obama keeps ruling as if we're in some great age of the vital center.
As for who wrote the book, I'm just a simple caveman, but aren't questions like this one the reason President Wilson invented authorship attribution and statistical text analysis software?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
i am even less of a simple caveman. so, pls explain the purpose of this article.
rj, Tim's giving us a sneak preview of the next big thing in
thinly-veiled racist anti-Obama conspiracy nutjobbery. This raises
two points:
1) What are we going to call the people who demand to see the
original Doc file or handwritten manuscript with Obama DNA on
it?
2) meme suggestion: Whenever we make a grammatical or spelling
error and only catch it after submitting, we blame the offending
post on Bill Ayers.
Why is Matt Welch Tim Cavanaugh such a racist?
What, Obama can't write? Because a black man can't write for
himself? What kind of bullshit is that?
What does it mean, this?:
> one the reason President Wilson
> invented authorship attribution
> and statistical text analysis
> software?
Cavenaugh has always had a problem with being too hipster for the
room! grrrrr
It's hilarious that Cavanaugh can't even recognize what BHO is
doing and just how radical he is. He's bringing out major
structural changes in the U.S., and the people he's selecting to
run things aren't bomb throwers but more like moles. The person who
handles intergov affairs is from a group that gave an award to
someone who'd proposed genocide (the OK kind, against white
people), and the "DiversityCzar" wanted to have co.'s fire white
people. And, someone who used to be a member of the first group now
sits on the SC.
As for Cashill, if he had any sense he'd drop things like this that
can never be proven without a smoking gun - something that's
probably been destroyed if it ever existed - and concentrate on
things that are objectively true and that can be used to strike
against the MSM. If Cashill spent 1/100th the amount of time he's
spent on his quest getting the answers to the
questions in the FAX here he could make CNN, the SPLC, and many
others look very bad.
That's why I love having you around, Juaquo Loco. As always, I'll look into your claims.
Oh, and for the record: Not only did I never doubt for an instant that Barack Obama was the author of DFMF when I was reading it. I actually had it figured that he was the only president since Gerald Ford who was capable of writing his own book.
Cashill's arguments are intriguing to say the least. But they are unlikely to convince somebody sympathetic to Barack Obama. Some kind of statistical analysis has to be done, even if it's inconclusive. Disputes about authorship of high-profile books are nothing new; numerous studies of Mikhail Sholokhov's All Quiet Flows the Don have been done. This novel is a masterpiece of the 20th century Russian Literature and Sholokhov has received a Nobel Prize for it. However, neither before nor after writing it Sholokhov demonstrated an ability to write so well.
Check www.wnd.com. 24Ahead is an idiot since Cashill does do and in depth analysis which will convince anyone with an open mind Ayers wrote the book.
Gerald Ford wrote a good bio of that young,idealistic,world traveling Marine.
The ChildishRanting in the 9:57 post is not me. The spacing should have been a clue. Quit spoofing me or you'll have to answer to my lawyers.
Tim,
Weren't your expectations of him to simply be black?
That's pretty much a campaign promise he was bound to keep. :)
to the extent President Obama disappoints me (a very limited
extent, as the Obama Administration has mostly been what I
expected)
You can't disappoint a pessimist. Every day is better
than you expect!
The first comment is from me, the second is not. Since Welch has
left comments here asking people to refrain from using others'
names, perhaps Reason could take the next step and reveal their IP
addresses and whether they match up with the IP addresses used by
others; I'm willing to provide Reason with scripts that will make
such IDing easier.
As for my comment, the group that SoniaS was a member of is the
NCLR. A former
VP of that group is now the White House director of
intergovernmental affairs.
And, from
this: At another conference, [an FCC official formerly with
CAP] spoke about the need to remove white people from powerful
positions in the media to give minorities a fairer
chance.
The most important thing is simple: find someone who can get a HI
official on the line and get them to answer to simple,
cut-and-dried questions in the FAX at the link in my comment. Then,
use that to force a correction from CNN. Then, use the CNN
correction to force corrections from those who relied on their
report. That will be like kidney-slapping the MSM, so I don't
really expect Reason to do it.
If only the energy expended on trying to make Obama and Ayers
into twin brothers and coming up with ACORN conspiracy theories
that make Truthers seem almost reasonable was instead used to
actually critique the actual policies of the administration.
I have a friend that tells 3-4 teleprompter jokes a day, but
couldn't come up with an actual complaint about any policy that has
been proposed or implemented other than a generic "Socialsm!"
I read and enjoyed Dreams From My Father
Enjoyed? I thought you were cool.
I read it when the Ayers-ghost theory was first floating, having
read plenty of Ayers's stuff already, and Dreams is just
too crappy to have been his work.
I doubt Obama's written anything that's come out under his name
since then, but that book is so him, such a dorky
pseudo-intellectual poseur-turd, it can't have been
edited, let alone ghosted.
Or maybe it's an unprecedented parodic metafictional tour de force.
Ayers can't do those. Do we know where Pynchon was?
1. Fun fact: the post in which I asked Reason commenter
John
Thacker not to lie about me is #15 for his name without quotes
in Google. Maybe whoever left the second message might end up
higher, once we know his or her full name.
2. Regarding the lack of discussion of BHO's policies, blame your
leaders. There is almost no push for an honest and open discussion
of important policies. Instead, all we got were horserace stories
and more or less rewrites of press releases. I tried to change that
by urging people to go out and engage politicians in impromptu
debates, and got almost no help (a guest blogger at ace.mu.nu
promoted a comment I left into the full post, but that was the last
help I got). Blame your leaders if you don't like that situation:
Reason, Instapundit, Fox, all the rest.
SG, I agree that these intricate conspiracy theories on both sides of the supposed aisle are a grand waste of time. But I think the people who are capable of critical thought are waiting for Obama to actually produce a substantive policy proposal. So far all his actions are reducible to rubber-stamping the Bush agenda.
The most popular theories as to the real author of Obama's book are Ben Johnson, Francis Bacon and Christopher Marlowe.
Bayesian classifiers, like those used to filter out spam, are actually extremely good at determining authorship, given enough words. If you can get enough samples of writing that is definitely President Obama's work and enough samples for Ayers, you can probably classify each page in the book as by one of them, both, or neither.
""I have a friend that tells 3-4 teleprompter jokes a day,
but couldn't come up with an actual complaint about any policy that
has been proposed or implemented other than a generic
"Socialsm!"
What are you going for?
- worse than Bush?
- worse than McCain would have been?
-as bad as Bush?
- just crappy in general?
Crappy in general would be pretty easy.
Actually all of them except for "worse than McCain" would be pretty
easy from a conservative or a libertarian standpoint.
I can send your friend some talking points if you want, or you
could just point him to this website.
Some Guy | September 24, 2009, 11:25pm | #
If only the energy expended on trying to make Obama and Ayers into
twin brothers and coming up with ACORN conspiracy theories that
make Truthers seem almost reasonable
It's not a theory when it's on tap.
Lonewacko: kudos for the lucidity. Points deducted once more for the oh-so-evident sense of self-importance.
The only dream Obama's dad had was nailing a white chick. Check!
Mission accomplished.
How could he seriously climb into his absentee dad's head. Unless
of course he recognized from his few interactions that they were
wired the same way.
Ergo...Obama's dream was nailing a black chick. Check! Mission
accomplished.
Racial bullshit politics in a nutshell. My individuality is
overcome by my tendency to conquer or submit to another 'group' of
humans which ironically I proxy with one representative of that
'group'. And worse yet, based on a horribly antiquated
understanding of human genetic diversity.
Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit!
I haven't read Dreams, but found Cashill's analysis moderately convincing. Obama was a pretty terrible writer back in his college days, from the few scraps that have been found. And it's clear he's been lying about his relationship with Ayers, because they've shared circles/causes/neighborhoods for decades.
"I actually had it figured that he was the only president since
Gerald Ford who was capable of writing his own book."
Give me a fucking break. Do we have to put up with the nauseating
"Barack Obama is so fucking brilliant" bullshit here too?
"...and coming up with ACORN conspiracy theories that make
Truthers seem almost reasonable..."
Conspiracy theories? Oh, wait, you are right. Those videos were
actually shot on a sound stage using paid actors. And all those
lawsuits and indictments against ACORN in 15 states? The Jews are
actually behind all that.
"I have a friend that tells 3-4 teleprompter jokes a day, but couldn't come up with an actual complaint about any policy that has been proposed or implemented other than a generic 'Socialsm'".
"Tim's giving us a sneak preview of the next big thing in
thinly-veiled racist anti-Obama conspiracy nutjobbery."
Did Ayers write it or not? How compelling is the evidence? Will
anyone actually confront Obama on the issue? It's possible that
this could just be the first step in undeniably proving that the
Obama line of "I barely knew the guy" isn't accurate.
So far all his actions are reducible to rubber-stamping the
Bush agenda.
Which is plenty enough to complain about.
What are you going for?
- worse than Bush?
- worse than McCain would have been?
- as bad as Bush?
- just crappy in general?
I'd love something more like "The health care 'reforms' are nothing
more than a massive government subsidy on top of the strengthening
of the worst parts of our current system." As opposed to say "We
have the greatest system in the world!"
It's not a theory when it's on tape.
Borat has people on tape. That doesn't make those people capable of
rigging elections. If anything, the tapes just show how incompetent
they are.
And all those lawsuits and indictments against ACORN in 15
states? The Jews are actually behind all that.
Are all completely valid, and will hopefully lead to the group
losing all federal and state funding. And it would be nice if
people could take that as a victory, instead of making us all look
bad by trying to turn them into Bond villains. They're Seth Evil,
at best.
B, the reason staff has to say crap like that. They are under tremendous scrutiny by their collegues, who would use anything, especially racism to marginalize their wacky views on freedom. And, Some Guy, your friend hasn't mentioned snitch websites and NEA propaganda calls? Or maybe some of those classy gifts, perhaps?
"Weren't your expectations of him to simply be black?"
Not only that, but he was not monumentally unqualified, and his
kids liked him!
Fuck. This is what happens when you give anything with a pulse the
right to vote.
I find it somewhat amusing that Obama found the time to write not one, but TWO autobiographies, yet non-autobiographical writings of his (from say, his stint as top guy at the Harvard Law Review) are either hidden away under lock and key, or totally nonexistent.
HTTP://WWW.ICFSHOP.COM =====FREE SHIPPING FREE======
BIKINI $25. OUR COMMITMENT,CUSTOMER IS GOD.
http://www.icfshop.com
All the products are free shipping, and the the price is enticement
, and also can accept the paypal payment.we can ship within 24
hours after your payment.
accept the paypal
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
our price:coach chanel gucci LV handbags $32coogi DG edhardy gucci
t-shirts $15CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes $35jordan dunk af1
max gucci shoes $33EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $15coach okely
CHANEL DG Sunglass $16.our price: (Bikini)coach chanel gucci LV
handbags $32.coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $15.CA edhardy
vests.paul smith shoes $35.jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes
$33.EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $15.coach okely CHANEL DG Sunglass
$16
http://www.icfshop.com =====FREE SHIPPING FREE=====
I wish you a happy shopping and happy every day!
I find it somewhat amusing that Obama found the time to
write not one, but TWO autobiographies,
The monumental narcissistic self-regard is staggering, true, and
confirmed by his habit of treating critics as illegitimate and
criticism of his policies as personal attacks.
Yeah I don't really get the Obama is a crazed leninist
stuff.
He's the most conventional mainstream politician on the planet
where conventional = preserving the rents & privileges of the
ruling class: the banking oligarchs.
Due to his somewhat unconventional background (for a politician) he
overcompensates by being extra-conventional. Very clever of Goldman
Sachs to pick him to be their lackey.
Oh, and for the record: Not only did I never doubt for an
instant that Barack Obama was the author of DFMF when I was reading
it. I actually had it figured that he was the only president since
Gerald Ford who was capable of writing his own book.
Science, Tim, any chance I could get some of that weed you are
smoking? I have yet to see this man express a single unique idea
since he entered the public arena. But he is capable of writing his
own book?! He wasn't named TOTUS soon after his election because of
his intellectual depth.
This is what happens when you give anything with a pulse the
right to vote.
I see you are making a narrow-minded attempt to minimize all the
work (God's work!) ACORN has done to register vitally-challenged
Americans to vote. Racist!
The science is simple:
Carter's books all suck.
Reagan was very open about using ghostwriters.
Bush I possessed a rapier wit, but he strikes me as the kind of guy
who views literature as something slightly fruity and untrustworty.
Ditto Bush II, minus the rapier wit.
Clinton didn't have the discipline for any kind of careful
book-writing effort, which is why his presidential memoir was a
Baghavad Gita-length data dump (as are several of the other memoirs
by the above).
Obama's book has all the thought-tormented, admirable-but-dull,
exquisitely self-regarding qualities that, as commenter ¢
notes, reek of the man himself.
Jerry Ford's writing is pretty foursquare, but in his long career
as the GOP's Mr. Reliable, he always put his best effort into every
task. Nixon too. I never doubt that I'm reading Nixon when I'm
reading Nixon.
People who don't read presidents' books are only cheating
themselves. They're automatically interesting, no matter how dull
the president or the writing.
I've only ghostwritten short stuff, but I know many ghostwriters,
and the fact that a memoir captures the qualities of the subject is
not evidence that the subject is the author. In fact the
ghostwriter's job is often to take the subject's own writing and
make it sound more like him or her. The Autobiography of
Malcolm X, certainly among the top 10 American memoirs, is
"told to" Alex Haley, but it captures the artist formerly known as
Malcolm Little better than anything Malcolm wrote himself.
So does this mean that Obama was born in Kenya with all the other ACORN socialists? After all, this is a blog post that links to a blog post that links to a blog post. If you can't believe what it says here, what can you believe?
I never doubt that I'm reading Nixon when I'm reading
Nixon.
Didn't Hugh Hewitt ghost some of Nixon's books?
If someone writes a book using extensive help from another, that person should be provided credit so the reader knows it. What makes me wonder is that some words are misspelled the same in stuff written by both authors, which is very unusual. And some of the stories on life situations are very similar to both authors in their respective books. No one will probably ever know what happened.
It seems a little odd to me that police inspectors can't seem to get it right, bungling evidence, resorting to magic police dogs or using fraudulent doctors as experts. Yet a "literary detective" supposedly gets it right? Where has all the skepticism gone?
Race defines everything now. Thankfully, Mr Pres. has downplayed
them. I think he understands that even within his own party he
better not step on racist toes.
Just reporting what should be obvious to all.
libertarians are the only people on earth who are not racist. We trust that everyone is capable of buying and selling in an open market. Racists will say that fellow humans cannot based on their skin color. libertarians call bullshit on such, well, bullshit.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245