Jesse Walker | August 21, 2009
The recent open-carry demonstration in Arizona has prompted some fearmongering stories about the Viper Team (or "Viper Militia," as it is often mislabeled), an Arizona group that was accused of plotting a major terrorist attack during the militia scare of the '90s and whose members eventually pled guilty to (or, in one case, was found guilty of) lesser weapons and conspiracy charges. For a stroll down memory lane -- and an antidote to the breathless stories circulating now -- here's Reason's coverage of the Viper case, written by Alan Bock and published in our December 1996 issue.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I'm not fond of the militia movement, but I sure as hell
understand its occurrence in the 90s. Reno and the actions taken by
government on people outside the norm scared the living shit of all
the people who were even a little on the fringe. It doesn't make
blowing up government buildings and shit like that right, but I
have a hard time begrudging people being prepared to defend
themselves.
I guess the question is will this administration make the same
mistakes in how it treats the fringe elements of the opposition. If
he keeps following Bush the US is in for a rough 4 years.
The intellectual left seems to be deathly scared of the "rednecks
with guns." I never really understood the fear.
The intellectual left seems to be deathly scared of the
"rednecks with guns." I never really understood the
fear.
Two possibilities:
1. They don't trust themselves with the responsibility of firearms,
therefore they don't trust other people (assuming everyone is as
inept and capricious as oneself).
2. Self-defense is seen as immoral, in that it doesn't allow for
discussion with the party trying to harm you. Implicit is the idea
that the only reason they would try to harm you is if they have a
grievance that needs attention, but which has agitated them to such
an extent that they turn violent. Also implicit here is that evil
is nothing but ignorance of proper channels to redres grievances
and that government is the logical tool to placate all of
humanity's various desires so that we can live peacefully (and the
only practical way turns out to be widespread, egalitarian
poverty).
My personal fear is that if one side in a political conflict
arms itself the other side will soon do the same. There is ample
historical evidence that leftists are not averse to using guns. I
prefer that we keep talking, keep yelling, keep screaming instead
of carrying guns. The other guys will start carrying their own guns
sooner or later. I don't want to recreate Weimar Berlin with gun
battles between paramilitaries. Beirut, anyone?
The historical record does not support the idea that leftists are
too woosified to use guns.
I prefer that we keep talking, keep yelling, keep screaming
instead of carrying guns.
What makes you think protesting makes me put on my gun? I've had it
on.
Furthermore, I'm going to keep it on. People like me don't start
firing without a reason or throw burning bottles into crowds.
You're thinking of socialist demonstrators (see France, Sweden)
proving that they're incapable of acting civil without a military
police force.
I prefer that we keep talking, keep yelling, keep screaming
instead of carrying guns.
The two are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, the only ones who have
used force to shut down a discussion have been unarmed SEIU
goons.
The other guys will start carrying their own guns sooner or
later.
Doesn't bother me if they want to abandon their childish anti-gun
fears and take responsibility for their own safety.
Wow - I thought the deadly Vipers were only a fictional group from a Quentin Tarantino film.
Mr. Dean,
It is precisely my point that the left is not averse to using
force. I don't think that it takes much to get any group of people
to "abandon their childish anti-gun fears."
My understanding of the realities of Berlin, Beirut, and
contemporary Baghdad (just to keep the alliteration going) is that
"responsibility" is not particularly common in human affairs.
I'm a child of the twentieth century which has left me with dark
view of what happens when politics and weapons mix. Perhaps, this
century will turn out to demonstrate that a Heinleinesque polite,
peaceful armed society is possible.
My understanding of the realities of Berlin, Beirut, and
contemporary Baghdad (just to keep the alliteration going) is that
"responsibility" is not particularly common in human
affairs.
I wouldn't disagree. For that very reason, I think that responsible
citizens should go armed. The greatest atrocities are committed
against unarmed citizens.
I don't think that it takes much to get any group of people to
"abandon their childish anti-gun fears."
Decades of living in high-crime cities with strict gun control
doesn't seem to have done the trick. I wouldn't be surprised,
though, to see people who would never pick up a gun to defend
themselves, decide that a gun is just the thing for imposing their
will on others.
Liberals shit their panties when they see anyone but government
thugs with guns.
I hope people keep organizing mass open carry demonstrations across
the country. Maybe it will spur a few of these bed-wetters to move
to Canada or France.
I read the Brock article with interest. But it predated the trial. And, bizarrely, there doesn't seem to be a Wikipedia article on the Viper Team. What was the outcome, and what's been the aftermath, of the trial?
We have a local town hall Monday, and rumor says the local militia has given up on staging a demonstration. For one thing, our Representative is a Republican. For another, all of the undercover cops who used to make up the crowd at the militia meetings are busy.
Gary: As I said above, all but one of the accused pled guilty to the lesser charges. The remaining Viper was convicted a few months later. You can read one defendant's post-facto explanation for why he changed his plea to guilty here.
I wouldn't be surprised, though, to see people who would
never pick up a gun to defend themselves, decide that a gun is just
the thing for imposing their will on others.
astute.
For another, all of the undercover cops who used to make up
the crowd at the militia meetings are busy.
perfect snark! win!
Viper Team
LOL
I always thought it funny in comics how the bad guys actauly called
themselves the bad guys. Legeon of Doom, Brotherhood of Evil
Mutants and apparetntly did so unironicly...
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245