Last week, Matt Welch posted a link to Whole Foods CEO John Mackey's op-ed in the Wall Street Journal outlining his free market-oriented plan for health care reform.
Mackey's article provoked a backlash from some of his more politically liberal customers, or at least people who claimed to be his customers. Daily Kos diarists fumed with outrage at Mackey's apparent betrayal. Sadly, No! declared it Simply Loathesome! My DD's Charles Lemos expressed his "infinite respect" for Mackey's business vision, but upon reading the op-ed was "struck how out of touch the Ayn Rand worshiping iconoclastic libertarian" is.
It's no secret that Mackey is a libertarian (and donor to the Reason Foundation, publisher of Reason magazine and Reason.com). I guess the outrage here is that he actually had the temerity to express his opinions in public, although he's done that before too, including in our magazine.
Still, the consensus lefty position seems to be that CEOs should just shut up, even if advocating, as Mackey did, some ideas they've tested at their own companies and found to work. Or at least shut up if they're advocating ideas that the left doesn't like. That seems to be where Think Progress blogger Matthew Yglesias comes down:
Corporate executives have a lot of social and political power in the United States, in a way that goes above and beyond the social and political power that stems directly from their wealth. The opinions of businessmen on political issues are taken very seriously by the press and by politicians on both sides of the aisle. Once upon a time perhaps union leaders exercised the same kind of sway, but these days all Republicans, most of the media, and some Democrats feel comfortable writing labor off as just an “interest group” while Warren Buffet and Bill Gates and Jack Welch are treated as all-purpose sages. One could easily imagine a world in which CEOs were reluctant to play the role of freelance political pundit out of fear of alienating their customer base. And it seems to me that that might very well be a nice world to live in.
Just a hunch, but I'm guessing that in this "nice world" Yglesias speaks of, a company like Walmart would still be permitted give organizations like Think Progress $500,000-$1 million to help push an employer health insurance mandate, and Matthew Yglesias would still put up blog posts praising the company for its leadership.
(Odd how this health care stuff has the left touting Walmart and the right touting Whole Foods, isn't it?)
Over at my personal blog, I put up a much-discussed response to the boycott here, and followed up with a response to that post's fallout here. Summation of my argument: Whole Foods is unfailingly listed among the most employee-friendly, environmentally-conscious, animal-friendly, and generally socially conscientious companies in the country. Remember, this is the same company that nearly cracked the subtitle of Jonah Goldberg's book as an example of liberal fascism. The left's tantrum in reaction to Mackey's op-ed implies his health care ideas are so offensive, they make all that "good corporate citizen" stuff obsolete. That is: Mackey expressing his ideas about health care reform are way more insidious than the actual practices his company has undertaken since its inception. It's really an effort to zone fairly mainstream ideas like HSAs and tort reform out of the realm of serious debate.
That seems to be the gist of Alyce Lomax's smart response to all of this at the Motley Fool, too:
Shouldn't the very people contemplating a Whole Foods boycott on these grounds applaud many of the company's existing initiatives? Are they aware of its progressive, employee-friendly policies? And if so, does this mean they don’t care as much as they think they do?
I mean, really, how dare Whole Foods let employees vote on their benefits, when most retail workers get no benefits whatsoever? The nerve of Mackey, forgoing his base salary and capping management's pay at 19 times that of his lowest-paid employee? What is Whole Foods thinking, donating part of its profits to local and global organizations working to make a positive difference? And giving the majority of its stock options to rank-and-file employees, rather than upper management? That's just diabolical!
Mackey, meanwhile, tried some damage control by putting up a post on his Whole Foods blog distinguishing what he originally sent to the Journal from what was added by Journal editors. That only made the perennially angry lefty Mark Kleiman even angrier. It also triggered this pithy response from the pithily named blog, "Fuck Conservatives."
For what it's worth, the "Boycott Whole Foods" Facebook group now stands at 14,000 people. And as of this posting, Whole Foods stock is trading at $28, which is actually a smidge above where it stood before Mackey's op-ed.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Joe M|8.19.09 @ 12:31PM|#
Far lefties are ignorant hypocrites. In other news, the sky is blue.
EJM|8.19.09 @ 12:31PM|#
See also "The Whole Foods Controversy in 15 Minutes" on the Atlantic's site.
|8.19.09 @ 12:38PM|#
As I said before, the majority of people who shop at Whole Foods are much more concerned with the selection, quality, and freshness of the food and see the socially/environmentally conscious trappings as a bonus.
|8.19.09 @ 12:38PM|#
If I only I could afford to shop there...
Ben Kenobi|8.19.09 @ 12:39PM|#
Oh please. Where else are these lefty yuppies going to shop and still feel smugly superior? They'll be back after about a week.
|8.19.09 @ 12:42PM|#
Up is down.
The big tent on the Left requires you to buy into every insane policy prescription and idea--or else you're shit. The big tent on the right includes people that actually disagree with each other about policy.
Tomcat1066|8.19.09 @ 12:44PM|#
Remember that, for many people, free speech is only worth a damn when you're saying something they like.
J.P.|8.19.09 @ 12:50PM|#
All this says to me is that many leftie Whole Foods customers are too lazy to research the political positions of the companies they patronize. When, GASP, those positions are reiterated and hit the MSM, all that ruffage they eat comes out of their mouth instead of their arse.
Barry Loberfeld|8.19.09 @ 12:50PM|#
How lucky these boycotters are to be free to do what they want with their own property.
EJM|8.19.09 @ 12:52PM|#
Where else are these lefty yuppies going to shop and still feel smugly superior?
reply to this