Nick Gillespie | July 24, 2009
Nobody gets the future right! Where's my jet pack? Why did super-science fail us?
And here's what Ebony mag, in 1985, thought Michael Jackson would look like in the year 2000:
I remain convinced that the best commentary on Jackson's odd and ultimately enormously disturbing life comes from RU Sirius, jefe at the indispensable H+, who eulogized the performer as "a signpost on the road to post-humanity... the future will study him from that perspective, and in some odd way, it will learn from his many mistakes."
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Xeones,
Go to the Ebony 1985 link. It's assume. They grayed Emmanuel Lewis
and stuck a mustache on him. Bam! This is what he should look like
in 2000. It's awesome.
I was watching this TV guide show and this dude was talking about how MJ's nose was removed at the time of death. Is that true? So South Park was right?
This sorta look like MJ is missing the tip of his schnoz.
http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/michael-jackson-nose.jpg
"In number, his fans will have grown tenfold by the year
2000".
There weren't enough people on the planet for his fans to grow
tenfold from 1985. Unless you count the dead, but that doesn't work
as well outside of Chicago.
Xeones
Billie Dee Williams was the first person I thought of when I saw
the "pic"
Art-P.O.G. wins the "Most Obscure Reference of the Week" award.
Here are your winnings. Don't blow it.
"At age 40, he will have aged gracefully and have a handsome,
more mature look."
lol
Growing up in the 90's, I'd sort of assumed Jackson always
looked like a monster. I was shocked to discover that in 1985, he
was actually a very handsome man, who for whatever reason decided
to butcher himself.
That picture is probably pretty close to what Jackson would look
like were he not bugfuck crazy.
Man, that guy.
I guess they assumed that hair and clothing styles were going to remain 1985-forever. Sadly, it was not to be.
Rhywun | July 24, 2009, 3:59pm | #
I guess they assumed that hair and clothing styles were going to remain 1985-forever.SadlyBy the Infinite Grace of the FSM, it was not to be.
FIFY
(All praise to the FSM)
Apart from the hair, the mustache and the outfit, I would've
been much happier with that look compared to where the poor guy
ended up.
And yeah, what's with this idea that hair and clothing and mustache
were going to remain 1985 forever???
Sloppy journalism. :)
you guys seriously need to stop bashing on MJ. so what. who cares. it was his decisions and not yours, and i know for a fact that he didn't do it for your judgments. so stop judging and hating, let him be. okay, so ebony mag was wrong, but this was the 80's..nothing was really ever right with those kinds of things. so calm down and if you don't have anything nice to say, than don't say it at all. cause your negative comments doesn't make you any better.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245