Jeff Winkler | March 5, 2009
"Predicting
Gambling Behavior From Sixth Grade to Kindergarten Impulsivity: A
Tale of Developmental Continuity," is a mouthful. It's also a
new
report in the Archives of Pediatrics And Adolescent
Medicine that links restless elementary school kids to adult
gambling problems later in life:
Problematic gambling in adults is associated with substance use, depression and suicide, psychopathology, poor general health and a multitude of family, legal and criminal problems...
Most disconcerting is that young people seem more vulnerable than adults to gambling-related morbidity [illness] and suicidality. Data suggest that in most cases, youthful recreational gambling predates pathological gambling in adulthood.
Maybe there's something to this study, but it seems like a real stretch. Apart from report's hints that gambling is a life-long addiction, the students' dispositions were first marked up like a report card:
At the beginning of the school year, teachers were asked to complete a questionnaire rating their students' inattentiveness, distractibility and hyperactivity on a scale from one to nine (with higher values indicating a higher degree of impulsiveness). After six years, when the children were an average of 11.5 years old, they were interviewed by phone and asked whether and how often they played cards or bingo, bought lottery tickets, played video games or video poker for money or placed bets at sports venues or with friends.
The Annoying Little Brat rating system seems arbitrary and a bit unsettling, seeing that it could be used simply to describe "problem children" as well as providing "evidence" for anti-gambling advocates.
But the dangerous correlation between games of chance and restlessness should not be downplayed.
See, the Winkler Family Patriarch loved to trick his spawn into playing "the quiet game." If the child could sit silent and still for a certain period of time, then he/she got little chocolate bars as winnings. A loss meant the old man had found someone to shave his back, and as the years progressed, the stakes got higher. The patriarch always gave 3-1 odds. And the house always won.
Less weird isĀ this interesting cultural history of America's fascination with chance.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
" Hi, my name's Jeff."
"I remember my first bet. My friend Timmy double-dog dared
me..."
Valentino's in a cold sweat
placed all his money on that last bet
against the odds he smokes another cigarette
says that it helps him to forget
that he's a nervous wreck
I'm not sure I like the modern trend towards pathologizing every behavior we find annoying or distruptive. Where is it written that all social interactions need be harmonious? Friction is part of the fun.
Wouldn't restlessness and gambling also correlate with other risk taking activity, like starting a buisness, inventing something new, or challenging a government policy? I've got a horrible image of teachers demanding ritilan for any student that displaces risk taking behavior.
Younger and younger kids are suffering from depression. They say that more kids are beginning to see the sippy-cup as half-empty.
bought lottery tickets?
at 11.5 yrs old?
I can see it now..a pretween walking into a quickie_mart with a
fake beard, slapping 2 bucks on the counter asking for a gold
scratcher.
Maybe the kids are bored and restless because they have to sit in a chair ALL DAY!!!!
I briefly worked at a convenience store years ago, and a
grandmother sent her 7 year old granddaughter into the store with
money for the gas just pumped and a lottery ticket.
Needless to say, I didn't sell it to her and grandma had to walk 15
ft into the store to buy her own ticket. Not all cashiers would
bother, though.
I see where all of this pseudo psychology is going . . .
"Mr. Speaker, I want to introduce HR8232, the "Protect the Children
Once More" act, to keep children from ever entering into games of
chance, lest they become pathological gamblers in the future and .
. . Why, there is a study that backs up this very concern, so I
don't know what the rest of my colleagues are laughing about!"
Actually, I completely forgot about that scene in Clerks where Randall sells cigs to a 5 year old but Dante takes the rap. Good call.
I don't buy it:
"I can see it now..a pretween walking into a quickie_mart with a fake beard, slapping 2 bucks on the counter asking for a gold scratcher."
In Texas at least, you can buy scratch-off tickets out of vending
machines.
Here's a forensic psychologist who has a great read on this
study (and a lot of other things):
http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2009/03/impulsivity_in_kindergarten_do.html
He points out that the sources for the very premise of the study
("Data suggest that in most cases, youthful recreational gambling
predates pathological gambling in adulthood. (1,2,8,9)") are
circular, and that those sources use a different definition of
'gambling' than the study itself does, and that neither the study
or those sources use "gambling" to mean what any of us usually
think of "gambling" as. Is playing bingo down at your church
gambling? It is, according to this study.
It's crap.
I was a restless, impulsive kid that constantly disrupted the
class. I also played marbles for keeps and was pretty good at
it.
I can walk past any one-armed bandit without even a sly wink. I
can't remember the last time I gambled, though I enjoy wandering
through casinos with a glass of wine in my hand.
I have gambled and won. My very first time I won $360.00 on a $1.00
bet. You'd think I would have been hooked for life. It was pretty
cool. I tried to wire the money home to avoid spending it. In those
days that wasn't possible from Carson City Nevada.
So, in at least one anecdotal case, mine, the study doesn't
fly.
On the down side, I do know a few gambling horror stories first
hand. Not pretty.
TWC, I, otoh, was a model child. perfect grades, never acted out, sat quietly in class, very attentive. Other than porn, pills, booze and gambling, I have no addictions. I can't go to casinos. I would sell my ass to OLS for more slots money.
I can't go to casinos. I would sell my ass to OLS for more
slots money.
Bro, that is just why they keep you in a monastery. :-)
As Clint Eastwood once said: A man has to know his own
limitations.
Therefore, it is a virtue that you simply stay out of casinos.
A loss meant the old man had found someone to shave his back, and as the years progressed, the stakes got higher.
Higher as in height, so you had to shave his head? Or higher as in
progressively twisted, so you had to shave his butt?
"I would sell my ass to OLS for more slots money."
That's pretty bad. He would probably try to mount it on his border
fence as a warning.
Remember, illegals, that your asses will be mine!
I wouldn't be surprised if gambling is linked to a gene that
makes a person more prone to risky behavior. Risk adverse kids
don't gamble on passing notes, etc. because they fear they'll get
caught. Less risk adverse kids take a shot at misbehaving because
they only see the reward.
All that said, there is no genetic explanation for why people play
pachinko.
that scene in Clerks...
That's it. I have a nemesis, and thy name is the innominate
one.
To the mattresses!
Winkler is one of those people that loves to divulge too much info about himself too early in the relationship.
See, the Winkler Family Patriarch loved to trick his spawn
into playing "the quiet game."...
The "good-natured" part of the good-natured ribbing is going to
wear off post-haste if this keeps up, Mr Zuckercorn.
Winkler is one of those people that loves to divulge too
much info about himself too early in the relationship.
What do you think we're going to find out next?
What do you think we're going to find out next?
I'm sincerely hoping it's that the family patriarch is Henry
Winkler. You can't have too many Fonzie jokes, especially regarding
shaving backs and whatnot.
Jump the shark, Jeff! Do it!
The "good-natured" part of the good-natured ribbing is going
to wear off post-haste if this keeps up, Mr Zuckercorn.
Oh, I could kiss you on the nuts!
I've been reading Reason for a few months, and this is my first
post; glad to contribute to the discourse:
Ejercito: the mechanism behind gambling addiction is the release of
dopamine and endorphines in the brains pleasure pathways, just like
with a lot of drug addictions.
There is a lot of research that links traits when people are
younger to the propensity to become gambling addicts, I don't have
the research in front of me but (from memory) some of the traits
are:
-above average intelligence
-ADD/ADHD
-entreprenuership
-social
-leadership capacity (among peers)
Of course a lot would also depend on conditioning, with one theory
being that people are much more likely to become addicts if durring
their first time gambling they expereince a 'big win' (multiple
months of income) and little chance of addiction if they do not
experience a big win near the beginning of their gaming
experiences, this theory mostly only holds for men, with women
gambling addicts generally stemming from gaming to ease stress or
deal with emotional issues.
There is deffinitely an argument to be made that the propensity to
have a gambling addiction is a maladaptive trait that is related to
beneficial evolutionary traits.
FrBunny | March 6, 2009, 8:17am | #
that scene in Clerks...
That's it. I have a nemesis, and thy name is the innominate
one.
To the mattresses!
no, thanks on the invitation to the matresses. I prefer the
ladies.
or as Jay once said, I'm so straight, I don't even like to see
myself naked.
no, thanks on the invitation to the matresses. I prefer the
ladies.
FrBunny is a lady.
Gambling is the most degenerate of vices.
Wanna bet?
Kent: You're all a bunch of degenerates.
Chris Knight: We are? What about that time I found you
naked with that bowl of Jell-O?
Kent: You did not.
Chris Knight: This is true.
Kent: Look, it was hot and I was hungry, okay?
What do you think we're going to find out next?
I don't know what will be purposefully revealed, but the really
important stuff usually is learned when it's just you, a scary
nurse, and a Qtip.
Epi - really? I assumed Fr was short for father or friar, (friar
bunny- heh), not fraulein or frau.
in any case, I don't do lagomorphs.
in any case, I don't do lagomorphs.
So what you're saying is that you're a furry, but you just don't do
chicks in rabbit costumes. Other costumes are fine. Got it.
It's just as well. My attempts at gangland violence always end
up more Spy vs. Spy than Godfather.
And yep, Fr is Frau. Consider my heart broken.
I've been teaching the New World Child to only play games of skill. At the age of 5, the girl is regularly beating her aunts at games like Mancala and Connect-4. She's also getting good at chess and checkers. I'm also beginning to wonder when she's going to start beating me. At 13, I could routinely beat my dad at Chess, so that's kind of my over/under. What I can't decide is if I should be proud or dismayed when the kid hits that mark...
You should by a corvette, get a divorce, date a 26 year old, be insecure, but happy for her... isn't that what most dads do?
New World Dan, I find it admirable to teach the NWC how to prevail at games of skill. Chess and checkers are are all well and good, of course, but when do you plan to introduce her to a game of skill that can actually put cash in her pocket? I refer, of course, to poker.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245