Jesse Walker | November 26, 2008
Al Qaeda supporters accuse the media of an "unfair" pro-Obama bias.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I suppose they're going to blame Obama for their upcoming NYC bombings, too.
From the linked item:
"In related news, Zawahiri's audio statement also appears to have
created a palpable, tense confrontation between Al-Qaida and a
significant cross-section of African-American Muslims. Several
U.S.-based Muslim organizations immediately held press conferences
or issued statements to strongly criticize al-Zawahiri and his
manipulation of the words of the late Malcolm X."
It's possible that we're seeing the influence of
W.D. Muhammad, the son of Nation of Islam boss Elijah Muhammad, who
switched to Sunni Islam and brought many former NOI-ers with
him. W.D. Muhammad had an interpretation of Islam which was
more Islamically "orthodox" than the NOI theory of whites being
created by a mad scientist; and at the same time was more
pro-American, emphasizing the argument that American Muslims could
be loyal to their native country.
This influence in American Islam is probably still extant in the
African-American community, so that the Wahhibist, anti-American
version of Islam has some competition in the struggle for hearts
and minds.
Obama is also to blame for me bombing on "Showtime At The Apollo". You infidel audiences are so tough, back home my material KILLS!
Obama's election is giving them heartburn.
I can't believe George Bush lost the PR war to these people.
They're terrorists, for Chrissake!
Nice headline, Jesse.
The thing is, joe, George Bush didn't lose a prpaganda war to
them so much as Al Queda and a major faction of the
interventionists in the U.S. government have a symbiotic
relationsship.
Each group derives its power by the atrocious behavior of its
opposite numbers. Imagine if Osama bin Laden was proposing jihad
against the Vienna Boys' Choir, he wouldn't attract up many
recruits. The more destructively the U.S. government behaves, the
more powerful he grows. The warmakers in the U.S. government need
an enemy too - the more fearsome the better.
Al Queda is hoping to goad Obama into anger, the way they could
reliably goad Bush and his men into anger. They need Obama to
continue producing atrocities that can be shown in all their gory
glory on Al Jazeera.
Another fact-based, highly informative post from Jesse Walker!
Thanks!
However, perhaps we might discuss the difference between fact and
fancy, the difference between things that have been proven and
things that haven't been proved at all but are simply assumed to be
true by cultists, the corrupt, and the like.
For instance, here I am, standing alone against
a horde of Flat Earthers, those who falsely assume something
has been proven despite the fact that it hasn't been
proven at all.
We know which camp "Reason" is in.
Best explanation (following 2 you tube videos) I've seen for the
total media blackout of what is the single greatest news event and
domestic threat -- let's call it OBAMAGATE -- since the outbreak of
the American Civil War and for the sincere prayers of the American
people that the United States Supreme Court -- let's call it OUR
LAST HOPE -- now to have the courage to save our great nation as we
have come to know it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1spPrzvYWRI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8b_usFyLHQ
tarran | November 26, 2008, 11:45pm | #
The thing is, joe, George Bush didn't lose a prpaganda war to them so much as Al Queda and a major faction of the interventionists in the U.S. government have a symbiotic relationsship.
Each group derives its power by the atrocious behavior of its opposite numbers. Imagine if Osama bin Laden was proposing jihad against the Vienna Boys' Choir, he wouldn't attract up many recruits. The more destructively the U.S. government behaves, the more powerful he grows. The warmakers in the U.S. government need an enemy too - the more fearsome the better.
Al Queda is hoping to goad Obama into anger, the way they could reliably goad Bush and his men into anger. They need Obama to continue producing atrocities that can be shown in all their gory glory on Al Jazeera.
I don't by the whole "Bush needs Al Queda" claim. The PATRIOT act
was just an incremental increase in powers the feds already
exercised to fight the War on Drugs. Who needs terrorist to
generate fear when plenty of people willingly hand over freedoms to
protect their towns from a weed.
We should avoid atrocities, protect civilians and up hold universal
rights as a matter of principle. Even so, don't expect Al Queda to
change their ways no matter what we do. They thrive on conflict, so
even if we make concessions, Al Queda will just find something else
to take offense at. I agree that Osama bin Laden probably likes the
Vienna Boys' Choir, but he would have a hissy fit if he saw
the Cheetah Girls. It features women singing in public with
their hair and arms uncovered. Let's face it. Making Al Queda less
angry is impossible, because they are set on finding something to
get angry about.
I was talking with a guy last week, who claims that Obama will
not be president, because he won't be able to produce a valid birth
certificate.
Truly, no idea is so stupid some nut won't run with it.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245