David Weigel | November 13, 2008
If you're in the D.C. area tonight, I'm appearing on an America's Future Foundation panel on the subject "Now What? An Election Postmortem."
With president-elect Barack Obama stepping into the White House, with expanded Democratic majorities in Congress, with public sentiment moving against free markets in the midst of the economic crisis, and with Virgina voters supporting a Democratic presidential candidate for the first time since 1964--now what? What does this mean for freedom and the free market principles that conservatives and libertarians fight for? Will this be the opportunity for the Republican Party to rebuild and come back to their roots of a smaller government? What lessons can be learned from this election and how do conservatives and libertarians move forward?
I'm stepping in for Evans-Novak reporter Tim Carney, so my remarks will be mostly exit poll and other data-driven with some suggestions of what libertarians in the GOP should do. The answer, obviously, is to ban gay marriage everywhere and ask Democrats hard questions then upload the responses to YouTube. Also, to run Sarah Palin for president every four years.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
The suggestions on the "Rebuild the Party" site are
hilarious.
Half are obvious jokes, the other half are DOCTORONPAUL.
Come on, Dave, you're just giving LonePsycho legitimacy. Although that was some delicious mockery, he's crazy enough to believe you just validated his worldview and methods.
Woe is us! Free-market principles will be violated and we will be enslaved like the hapless French. Ah, Freedom! So fleeting! To be free, to be free! How I dread the freedom-crushing universal health care that our commisars will force on us! Freedom is slipping away. Soon we'll all be wearing berets and and relying on the All-Powerful State! We must resist! Shout it from the roof tops. Government is the problem, not the solution!
I have a feeling the dumbass of who you speak will show up on the thread soon, TAO.
I actually know nothing, nip, nada, about this thing called the "free market"; I can, however, fit 3 turd, a jar of vaseline, and a box of pencils in my mouth.
"Lefiti | November 13, 2008, 2:32pm | #
Content free!! You freedom-hating commie!"
Huh?
Leftiti apparently thinks the bailout is going really well, and wants to see more action along similar lines.
If Lefiti was a real leftist and not a troll, he/she/it would be against the bail out as most liberals were.
Fluffy
You cut me to the quick. I don't want anything to interfere with
the natural workings of the Market. Just look what government
intervention has wreaked in Spain, France, and Germany. The poor
enslaved souls in those state-dominated societies walk with their
heads down, dranging their chained feet painfully along. That's not
for the freedom loving Americans! No Bailout!
Limerick form, Lefiti. Don't make me filter you. (A nice solid Dirt Devil HEPA upside the head should do.)
Dave Weigel,
You caused me to link to lonewhacko's site. That is irresponsible
at best. It is more reasonably categorized as malicious
mischief.
I demand recompense.
BDB:
Most liberals against the bailout?
You pay any attention?
It was republicans who stopped it from passing the first time (for
dumb reasons), I didn't hear many liberals voices condemning it.
Frank, Pelosi, Dodd, Reid....
The answer, obviously, is ...
Isn't your boss Jesse Walker? Doesn't Walker always go around
saying (correctly) 'don't feed the troll'? Weird.
Most liberals against the bailout?
You pay any attention?
It was republicans who stopped it from passing the first time (for dumb reasons), I didn't hear many liberals voices condemning it. Frank, Pelosi, Dodd, Reid....
Actually since Democrats had the majority they could have passed it
without a single Republican vote. Pelosi let a lot of them off the
hook though because they were up for reelection and something like
90% of voters new how stupid the bailout was. So they didn't want
to lose any of those votes by doing something stupid...and voting
for the bailout.
Lefiti, why are you so obnoxious and
content-free?
They respond to trolls and pine over H&R's decline. Effect,
meet Cause.
Dave Weigel:
Thanks for the link. And, thanks also for being you.
For instance, by trying to pretend that my nearly two year effort
to get people to hold politicians accountable is equivalent to
banning gay marriage.
And, it's certainly odd how a movement that claims to have such a
deep support for the Constitution keeps trying to dissuade people
from exercising their 1st Amendment rights to hold politicians
accountable, something that's also a duty and a necessity due to
the corruption of the MSM.
keeps trying to dissuade people from exercising their 1st
Amendment rights
I would also dissuade the Klan from exercising its form of
dumbassery.
I support your right to be an idiot. I support my right to tell you
to quit being an idiot.
So is 24Ahead Lonewacko?
And if so, when did he get his shift key fixed?
Just look what government intervention has wreaked in Spain,
France, and Germany.
GDP growth that consistently trails the US?
I comment on this here, including a nifty graphic showing something that would have caused a hack like Weigel to faint.
24A! You monster!
What HAVE you done with LoneWacko and his ShiftKey?!!
Joining us for this panel is Reihan Salam, author of "Grand
New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the
American Dream"
Blech.
The answer, obviously, is to ... ask Democrats hard questions
then upload the responses to YouTube.
You have to admit, the Joe the Plumber incident was a pretty good
argument for the madman's method.
TTFN! Off to self-flagellate!
The question that JTP asked was in no way comparable to the type
of questions I want asked. I think the non-corrupt part of why my
support for holding politicians accountable meets resistance is
because some people don't understand what a real question is.
I've never seen it, but doesn't CourtTV show lawyers asking a
series of questions designed to show that a witness is lying or
similar? Perhaps Weigel should switch off Oprah and watch that
instead.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245