Jesse Walker | October 27, 2008
Andrew Keen predicts an end to backyard gardens, playground basketball, basement jam sessions, amateur painting, and open mic nights for the duration of the economic hard times, because "the idea of free labor will suddenly become profoundly unpalatable to someone faced with their house being repossessed or their kids going hungry."
Oh, wait. Hold on. He only predicts an end to unpaid-but-pleasurable labor on the Internet:
So how will today's brutal economic climate change the Web 2.0 "free" economy? It will result in the rise of online media businesses that reward their contributors with cash; it will mean the success of Knol over Wikipedia, Mahalo over Google, TheAtlantic.com over the HuffingtonPost.com, iTunes over MySpace, Hulu over YouTube Inc., Playboy.com over Voyeurweb.com, TechCrunch over the blogosphere, CNN's professional journalism over CNN's iReporter citizen-journalism... The hungry and cold unemployed masses aren't going to continue giving away their intellectual labor on the Internet in the speculative hope that they might get some "back end" revenue.
Because that's why most people contribute to YouTube and Wikipedia. It's the reason why people post comments here at Hit & Run. "Back end" revenue! It's the American dream!
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Thank God I got some appropriate snark for this stupid idea. Over at Slog they treated it with a modicum of respect...blech.
I don't know which phrase is worse: "back-end revenue" or "long-tail revenue." Perhaps the former, as it seems almost cool to say that "I'm gonna git me some long tail." Almost.
Seriously. I do not want to hear about backend revenue. Except
maybe about Donderooooooo. Cause that would be funny.
So with all this ecocnomic downturniness we're going to pay with
our reduced incomes for all the content we wouldn't pay for during
the heady days of Pets.com?
I thought that trying to make people buy bogus "content" was
pretty much the downfall of AOL.
Furthermore, it still irritates me that newspapers have internet
content that is "subscription only"...FOLKS! IT IS 2008! I can go
anywhere on the internet and find your crappy content in like, 30
seconds.
Your right Walker!!! I DEMAND my money! Tell Reason to fork it
over or I'm gonna put on my purple fur coat with my hat and feather
ensemble and resort to keeping my pimp hand strong!!!
By the way Walker. While on this subject you should demand a tip
from readers despite your wage from Reason. I'm a bartender and
trust me, it's the way to go.
Jaysus, as pretentious jerks as we can be around here, Andrew Keen and 'thinkerNet' just takes the fucking cake.
In related news, I was sworn into the Virginia Bar today. Now that I'm a lawyer, I expect royalty checks for the legal opinions I post on this site.
Obviously I don't get paid for this comment, BUT I would say 90%
of the things I INTENT to do "on that internet" are in the pursuit
of making money ( work). Places like Hit&Run and a lot of other
blogs/forums are ( welcome) distractions.
If I used Youtube much, it probably would have something to do with
marketing/money in at least a round about way.
When I play basketball in my backyard there is never any intent and
expectation for making money. When I jerkoff on the internet it is
usually while at least attempting to do productive work.
Just my small individual experience, of course.
When I think of the bailout, and its fallout, I do think "back
end"... but I don't think "revenue".
By the way, how much are we charging joe to post here,
anyway?
And, I'm not kidding, put "tip jar" at the end of each post with a
link to PayPal, and you guys will be getting some serious "Change
We Can Believe In(tm)." (And I mean for the actual blog post by the
professionals, not the commentariat, who are more than compensated
by their employers while they're goofing off here.)
The funny thing is, all of the things he said people would do
less in are things I would expect people to do more of because
they're free fun. How is Youtube any different from regular home
movies that you can use to annoy the whole world. Though, what
would I know, unlike Keen, I've worked for profitable
companies.
And seriously, Knol over Wikipedia? Knol sucks monkey balls.
Now that I'm a lawyer, I expect royalty checks for the legal opinions I post on this site.
Careful what you say about shit outside of VA. Unlicensed practice
of law and all that jazz. Oh, and congrats. Though I thought the
bar exam was pretty straightforward, the two months of (paid)
studying sure blew ass.
People will stop posting stuff on the internet when they have no
more money to pay for the service.
Hell some people will feel like they are working by blogging and
some might even find a job out of it.
"And seriously, Knol over Wikipedia? Knol sucks monkey
balls."
and with that, our good Friend, Mo, ushers in another MONKEY
TUESDAY.
All payments may be directed at the email link in my screen name. I accept VISA, Mastercard, PayPal, and beaver pics of your skinnier sisters.
Start charging for your poop videos right when people don't have money to spend on poop videos? It could be genius!!
We want more money!
What money?
The internet money!!!
Yeah, we want some of that internet money!
Wait, I thought with Obama in charge no one will be greedy anymore? Isn't he going to spread around the poop...videos.
Does this mean Reason will have to pay LoneWhackoff? 'Cause that's a lot of dumb to be just giving away.
Back End Revenue 1-7 were not that great, but Back End Revenue 8 is a classic of the genre.
Mr. Keen clearly misunderestimates the tenacious quality of ego.
YouTube videos and chatty message boards aren't "intellectual
labor", they are a form of ego self-stroking. And even if one is
more charitable toward Mr. Keen and calls Internet activity
"recreational," recreation didn't even disappear during the Great
Depression.
Of course, my opinions are so freakin' valuable that everyone
should want to pay for them!
BTW, congratulations, Mr. Boston Esq. My wife also was admitted to
the Va. bar yesterday. Wasn't that ceremony a clusterfuck of
massive proportions. Good thing I brought a book while they named
off hundreds and hundreds of newly minted shysters...
Tell Reason to fork it over or I'm gonna put on my purple
fur coat with my hat and feather ensemble and resort to keeping my
pimp hand strong
I take this as a Saint's Row shoutout.
I expect royalty checks for the legal opinions I post on this
site.
In my experience, Reason has always paid what our opinions are
worth.
A few years back, I figured out a way to make money from my
postings at Slate.com. Having two "starred" personas, I sold one
named RatSoN. I suspect, it was one of the reasons Slate's editors
stopped giving stars to favored commenters.
I haven't thought of a way to make money by posting at
Hit&Run...yet.
Reading this comment costs you $0.02 (my two cents' worth, eh). Make sure to send me the cash.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245