Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Hey, Everybody! We're All Gonna Get Federal Grants!
I've
been meaning to post this for a few days: Murray Waas, Brian Ross
and Anna Schechter have a
eye-boggling story of Justice Department corruption that's
getting lost in the political news maelstrom.
A senior Justice Department official says a $500,000 federal grant to the World Golf Foundation is an appropriate use of money designed to deal with juvenile crime in America.
"We need something really attractive to engage the gangs and the street kids, golf is the hook," said J. Robert Flores, the administrator of the Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
But the program was ranked 47th out of 104 applicants. What pushed it over the top? Of course:
The honorary chairman of the First Tee program is former President George Bush. On a videotape presentation, the former President Bush praised the program for "serving others and building character and building values."
And what got the shaft?
A program to help troubled teens in San Diego, Vista, was ranked number two by the staff out of 202 applicants in its category of prevention and intervention but was turned down for a grant to help deal with inner city teen violence in San Diego. Another program, designed to train adult guards to deal with teens in custody, also was denied federal money even though it was ranked by the staff number 2 out of 104 in its category.
Another program that got money: Best Friends, an abstinence program run by Bill Bennett's wife and ranked 53rd on the merit list.
|6.12.08 @ 10:01AM|#
I, for one, am glad that the Justice Department is finally taking a proactive approach to the gang menace terrorizing Scottsdale, Arizona.
Russ 2000|6.12.08 @ 10:03AM|#
On the other hand, I guess it's a lot easier to beat the shit out of someone with a polo mallet than with a putter.
|6.12.08 @ 10:04AM|#
The extended ABC headline...
Former Staffer Tells ABC News Anti-Crime Funds Given to
Programs With The "Right" Connections
sigh...you know, if the MSM was really trying to avoid the bias
label, they'd stop labeling crap like this as "Right". This is
political cronyism, pure and simple. It's only being done by the
"Right", since the "Right" controls the executive office at
present.
Nigel Watt|6.12.08 @ 10:06AM|#
MP, I think you're reading too much into that. I'm pretty sure it's in quotes because it's saying that they're "highbrow", not that they're right-wing.
|6.12.08 @ 10:11AM|#
I didn't read it that way either. Maybe I've become so overwhelmed by the liberal media conspiracy that I'm no longer be able to identify it.
Danny Noonan|6.12.08 @ 10:11AM|#
Golf is a great way to stay away from gang influences. I should
know - me, D'Annunzio, and the rest of the caddies would have been
gang banging all summer if it wasn't for the good people at
Bushwood C.C., like Judge Smails. Organized activities like the
caddy pool party helped to keep all of us on the straight and
narrow.
Back off golf people!
Episiarch|6.12.08 @ 10:11AM|#
I can't believe they chose golf over polo.
Why didn't my fencing and steeplechase suggestions win?!?
|6.12.08 @ 10:11AM|#
I can't get the Lee Iacocca/Snoop Dogg Chrysler commercial out of my head now. Thanks for conjuring visuals of the pimped-out golf cart, and reverberations of the quote, "Fo' shizzle, Icazizzle."
Elemenope|6.12.08 @ 10:13AM|#
No, I think MP got the implication correctly...I just don't have the problem with it that he/she has.
Elemenope|6.12.08 @ 10:14AM|#
Why didn't my fencing and steeplechase suggestions
win?!?
You joke, but I can see how kids of any stripe can get behind
learning how to stab people with swords.
TallDave|6.12.08 @ 10:16AM|#
Corruption? So, your theory is W is secretly enriching his dad
with crime-fighting golf grants?
As stupid as this program surely is, I'm sure the 53 ahead of it on
the "merit list" (which sounds pretty subjective and political)
were just as big a waste of taxpayer money. It sounds like a
political appointee made a political decision about where grant
money should go, and other people disagreed for equally political
reasons. Just filling out a "merit list" doesn't create an
infallible priority level.
This isn't a tenth as corrupt as what Congress is doing with
earmarks.
Episiarch|6.12.08 @ 10:17AM|#
You joke, but I can see how kids of any stripe can get
behind learning how to stab people with swords.
You don't stab, you extend, potentially after lunging. You must be
poor.
|6.12.08 @ 10:19AM|#
Caddy Shack, Animal House, Blazing Saddles, Porkys, The Rocky
Horror Picture Show, Taboo 2.
Ahhh, the golden age of American Cinema
|6.12.08 @ 10:20AM|#
This isn't a tenth as corrupt as what Congress is doing with
earmarks.
Agreed. This is run-of-the-mill cronyism. It deserves to be
highlighted, but it's pretty low on my (incredibly long) list of
things that piss me off about the Federal government.
|6.12.08 @ 10:22AM|#
I'd be outraged, but after the torture, the pictures of the torture, the justifications for the torture, the banning of cameras so there are no more pictures of the torture, the gutting of Habeas Corpus, the justifications of the gutting of Habeas Corpus, the money blown on stuff for Katrina victims spent on warehousing and then giving away the stuff, the firing of attorneys for non-political actions when they could have kept their jobs if they had been more political, the document hiding, the document destroying, the obfuscation, the pardon, the idea that there's no reason to make a serious effort to keep records, the war that's justified as keeping them fighting us over there with no clue how hard that is to sell that idea over there when we're supposedly caring about what they think, the bankrupting of the country, and the idea that everything will be great if we all get a $600 payoff to be paid off over the next six decades... I'm just too damn tired to be outraged.
TallDave|6.12.08 @ 10:26AM|#
From what I can tell from their grants, this whole department is
a giant boondoggle that should be extirpated root and branch.
The sensible way to keep kids off the streets and out of situations
where they get beaten by prison guards is to reform our drug laws
so they aren't sucked into a black market business with 10,000%
profit margins created and maintained by our laws.
|6.12.08 @ 10:30AM|#
so they aren't sucked into a black market business with
10,000% profit margins created and maintained by our
laws.
So keep them out of corn farming, too?
Elemenope|6.12.08 @ 10:30AM|#
You don't stab, you extend, potentially after lunging. You
must be poor.
Lunge! Parry, Riposte! Parry, Riposte! Disengage...Lunge!
Touche!!!
But I won't discount the fact that I'm poor. :)
JMR|6.12.08 @ 10:34AM|#
This AND the "stimulus" checks drawn on our national credit
card? "What a country!"
JMR
|6.12.08 @ 11:14AM|#
I'm going to go ahead and agree with TallDave on his 10:16
comment.
I'd be outraged, except the alternative is that the money go to
some other retarded program instead of not being spent.
|6.12.08 @ 11:24AM|#
I've participated in Frist Tee events. It is a nice little program. But it doesn't need taxpayer funds to keep doing its job. TallDave offers a much better solution to gang problems, coupled perhaps with eliminating minimum wage laws for people under 20.
Rhywun|6.12.08 @ 11:25AM|#
At least earmarks go to fluff like museums and nature trails. This shit is supposed to address a real problem but is instead laughably way off the mark.
|6.12.08 @ 11:46AM|#
I don't know. The problem as I see it, is that they're taking my money. Naked corruption at least has the advantage of being seen as wasteful. If the money was used for it's intended purpose, or worse, if it was used effectively for its intended purpose, it would only encourage them to take more from me.
|6.12.08 @ 11:47AM|#
How the hell is golf, an expensive hobby, going to help a poor,
innercity kid?
Golf requires expensive equipment, transportation as most courses
are not accessable by public transport and greens fees.
What a joke.
|6.12.08 @ 12:43PM|#
Fuck golfers.
You read that correctly, fuck the golfers.
Like all good libertarians I rail against wefare payments to women
who get themselves knocked up while already sucking at the public
tit. I seethe, fume, boil over with rage, etc. when the subject of
fucking golf comes up.
Long before billionaire professional sports team owners started
getting welfare payments for their toys (stadia), golfers have been
plundering the treasuries of every level of government in order to
subsidize what is essentially a rich mans game. Golf courses, those
environmental blights on the landscape of municipalities across the
nation should be put up for auction immediately. Every last one of
them.
You want to chase a little ball around a manicured, water wasting,
over fertilized, pesticide laden, economically inviable, lawn go
right ahead. Just don't expect taxpayers, the vast majority whose
golf experience is limited to courses with green carpet, windmills
and connecting tubes, to pay for your stupid fucking game.
I'm a big supporter of the military, and can even be persuaded
(with difficulty) that certain recreation facilities for serviceman
can be justified. The library, pool, EM club, auto hobby shop, I'll
give a pass to. A damned golf course? Not only no, but FUCK
NO!
Here's a list of Navy golf courses.
NB/NS/NAS San Diego, California
WPNSTA Seal Beach, Cypress, California
NAWS China Lake, Ridgecrest, California
CBC Port Hueneme, California
NPGS Monterey, California
SUBASE New London, Groton, Connecticut
NAS Pensacola, Florida
NAS Whiting Field, Milton, Florida
NAS Jacksonville, Florida
NS Mayport, Florida
SUBASE Kings Bay, Georgia
NS Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
NAS Barbers Point, Hawaii
NS Great Lakes, Illinois
NSWC Crane, Indiana
NSA Naples, Italy
NAF Atsugi, Japan
NAS Brunswick, Maine
USNA Annapolis, Maryland
NAS Patuxent River, Maryland
NSF Indian Head, Maryland
CBC Gulfport, Mississippi
NAS Meridian, Mississippi
NAEC Lakehurst, New Jersey
NSA Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania (717) 605-2297
WPNSTA Charleston, Goose Creek, South Carolina
Rota, Spain
NSA Midsouth, Millington, Tennessee
NAS Corpus Christi, Texas
NAS Oceana, Virginia Beach, Virginia
NAVPHIBASE Little Creek, Norfolk, Virginia
NS Norfolk, Virginia
NWS Cheatham Annex, Williamsburg, Virginia
NAS Whidbey Island, Oak Harbor, Washington
After some extensive in depth calculations, I have determined the
land that thes courses sit on is worth 2.4 gazillion dollars. The
other services golf courses can be found here.
Detroit is goddamed insolvent. We closed the Aquarium (it was the
first in North Amarica), stopped funding the zoo, historical museum
and art institute due to budget constraints. Go
here for a list of Detroit public golf courses.
Golfers aren't a bit ashamed about their blatant siphoning of money
from the the public till. Just Google
Public Golf Courses and take a look around.
I am beyond fed up with subsidizing entertainment for businessmen
and retirees with no fashion sense. Anytime you hear a fat ass
golfer complaining about government waste ask about your local
taxpayer subsidized course.
Fuck golf, fuck golf courses, fuck golfers, and fuck Arnold
Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods.
Did I mention the subject gets me a bit animated? I apologize for
the length of this post. It was cathartic for me.
|6.12.08 @ 12:57PM|#
J sub D:
"Public golf course" doesn't mean "taxpayer funded" golf course. It
simply means, "open to the public" for daily-fee play. The lion's
share of "public golf courses" are privately-owned. This contrasts
with "private golf course" which means "open only to dues-paying
members of our club."
I suspect you're confusing "public golf course" with "municipal
golf course", which are owned by cities, counties, parks
commissions, etc. There are lots of munis in the country, enough to
piss off every libertarian and then some and, in fact, the US Open
is being played on a particularly spectacular specimen of muni as I
type.
|6.12.08 @ 1:04PM|#
I stand corrected. I'll still wager that the majority of public golf courses are taxpayer subsidized. They'd be sold to developers otherwise.
|6.12.08 @ 1:23PM|#
You might want to rethink that wager.
I think the biggest "subsidy" that golf courses get comes via
zoning and land-use policies. In many instances town zoning
policies will favor the building of golf courses over the building
of residential developments. Golf courses will often conform to
regulations in certain zones that housing wouldn't. Citizens of
many towns welcome using land for golf courses because it means the
land isn't available for homes that will be filled with children --
children that will be educated at taxpayer expense. Golf courses
also create a lot less traffic than residential developments
do.
Kolohe|6.12.08 @ 2:00PM|#
I'm a big supporter of the military, and can even be
persuaded (with difficulty) that certain recreation facilities for
serviceman can be justified [but not golf].
As far as I know, the mwr budget is self sustaining for operating
costs (paid for by profits from the exchanges and minimarts)
I'll grant you there is a subsidy in capital costs (specifically
land) and the salaries for oversight personal (uniformed) are paid
out the general military budget.
And it's not my thing either, but plenty of E4-E6's's play golf;
the tee times in HI generally fill up every weekend.
|6.12.08 @ 2:06PM|#
You might want to rethink that wager.
You might want to provide evidence I'm wrong. The list of Detroit
public golf course I linked to are 100% government owned. The mayor
tried to sell one of them and it set off a feeding frenzy. No
private golf course operator wanted to buy it. Some other
governmental entities were interested in taking it iff Detroit's
hands, residential developers were interested in putting housing
there, but nobody wanted to OWN A GOLF COURSE FOR PROFIT.
|6.12.08 @ 2:16PM|#
Kolohe,
Of course they fill up. Junior enlisted can't afford to golf if
isn't subsidized. They can close down the bowling alley on base and
people will go out on the economy to bowl. Ditto the clubs.* In a
mtropolitan area golf courses are private clubs for the wealthy or
subsidized by the taxpayer. I will patiently await evidence for
privately owned and operated public golf courses in major
metropolitan areas.
* Isolated military bases are a different story, of course. Golf
courses in Hawaii, San Diego, DC, Norfolk etc. are
unconscionable.
Rhywun|6.12.08 @ 2:35PM|#
I'm in the "fuck golf" camp. Played it once, bored to tears. It's unconscionable to me that so much green space is given over to what is essentially a hobby for the privileged. If the land is privately-owned, fine. But look at any map of a large city. Most of the green space (which is usually passed off as "parks") is golf courses.
|6.12.08 @ 2:36PM|#
Right now, nobody wants to invest in a golf course in America
because there's an oversupply of courses due to an overestimation
of demand that would be generated by the "Tiger boom".
I'm quite familiar with the golf building boom of the late 90s and
early 00s in my area and I'm having a hard time figuring out
exactly how these private dailies are subsidized.
I'm not sure how I could go about marshalling the evidence that
most private daily-fee courses aren't subsidized. I only know about
how the munis and privately-owned dailies around me operate and I'd
be shocked if it were any different elsewhere. When governments
subsidize golf courses, they do so through their own munis because
the pols can turn them into patronage mills where they can play
free golf and their ne'er-do-well cousins and brothers-in-law can
get jobs sitting on their ass all day. As such, the vast majority
of munis are poorly maintained goat-tracks that most serious
golfers avoid like the plague. There are notable exceptions (Torrey
Pines in San Diego, Bethpage on Long Island, and the odd course
here and there) and those certainly bother my libertarian
sympathies. But the $100+ dollar greens fees I pay at the newer
private dailies in Massachusetts tells me that you're all wet
regarding non-muni courses.
Since you're so exorcised over the matter, I would have figured
you'd have some data at hand. Take a look at the greens fees of the
non-muni, privately-owned dailies around Detroit.
|6.12.08 @ 3:18PM|#
Shedding a little light on the subject at hand.
From a free enterprise think tank, the Mackinac Center for Public
Policy, is this article Government Golf:
Unfair Competition Hurts Business, Taxpayers.
According to the Michigan Golf Course Owners Association and Mackinac Center research, about 91 Michigan golf courses are owned by various units of government, including seven owned by state universities.
I'm too lazy to collate the data on Michigan's 823 privately owned
golf courses. their prices, whether they are open to the public
etc. A quick google didn't reveal a summary of that sort of
information.
I know you golfers are a passionate bunch and to each their own is
my philosophy. But I'm sure most reasonoids would agree
with
Government golf is unfair to taxpayers and golf course owners and may actually lower the amount of greens and golfers in the state. Municipal courses should be sold to the highest bidder.
|6.12.08 @ 3:21PM|#
BTW, The Mackinac Center for Public Policy folks are big time free enterprise supporters. They are probably on Cato's speed dial.
|6.12.08 @ 3:27PM|#
I will patiently await evidence for privately owned and
operated public golf courses in major metropolitan
areas.
How do I go about supplying evidence of a lack of a subsidy? If
private daily-fee golf is subsidized to the degree you imagine, I'd
think it would be quite easy to pull up coverage of acrimonious
political debates surrounding new golf course construction, line
items in municipal budgets, and other sorts of data. The fact of
the matter is that private daily-fee golf isn't subsidized to any
significant degree and that fact is completely unremarkable and
known by people familiar with golf. I'd be shocked if there were
coverage of this fact for me to link to simply because it's not
what normal people would consider "news".
Generalissimo Franco is STILL dead and privately owned golf courses
are STILL private!
You want to rail against the concept of muni golf, I'm there with
ya, buddy. But it's obvious that whatever problem you have with
golf and/or people who play golf has led you to assume things about
private daily-fee golf that you can't back up with facts.
|6.12.08 @ 3:48PM|#
Government golf is unfair to taxpayers and golf course
owners and may actually lower the amount of greens and golfers in
the state. Municipal courses should be sold to the highest
bidder.
I completely agree with this. But let's please distinguish between
government-owned, private daily-fee, and private member clubs.
According to
this story, the breakdown among the three types is muni:15%,
private-daily: 58%, and private-member: 27%. I am not opposed to
making that 17% go down to 0. If you want to hate on golfers, be my
guest, but do so based on facts.
Geotpf|6.12.08 @ 4:14PM|#
I saw a TV ad for this program on CNN yesterday. I couldn't believe how stupid it sounded. Basically, it was "Get gang members off the street by funding golf tournaments for them!" I now wonder who paid for the TV ad (IE, was it the taxpayers?).
|6.12.08 @ 5:16PM|#
According to this story, the breakdown among the three types
is muni:15%, private-daily: 58%, and private-member: 27%. I am not
opposed to making that 17% go down to 0. If you want to hate on
golfers, be my guest, but do so based on facts.
First, let me thank you for doing the grunt work obtaining them.
Basically 20% of courses open to the public are munincipally
owned/operated.
My comments were referring to metropolitan courses where I suspect
munincipally owned/operated course percentages are somewhat higherm
but that's a facesaving quibble. ;-)
We likely agree on policy and chagrin in your case, or disgust in
mine, over the golfing community's success at picking the taxpayers
pocket.
Yeah, I hate golf but my disgust at major league sports team owners
is equally intense.
Of the four big league facilities in metro Detroit, two (Tigers and
Pistons) are privately owned, one is a city owned with a sweet deal
for the tenants (Red Wings) and one ~50% taxpayer money
(Lions).
Nice talking with you, Doctor. The lack of insults and profanity
moves a discussion right along.
Rhywun|6.12.08 @ 5:52PM|#
Municipal courses should be sold to the highest bidder.
Since these courses are typically passed off as "parks" (e.g. they
look like parks on a map and cities typically include them in their
park acreage), I'd rather see them used *as parks*. I'm not
libertarian enough to start auctioning off city parks.
|6.12.08 @ 10:53PM|#
Did someone actually believe there was a merit system in doling out the goodies?
|6.13.08 @ 12:51AM|#
Best Friends, an abstinence program run by Bill Bennett's
wife and ranked 53rd on the merit list.
If I was married to bennett, I wouldn't want to fuck, either...
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245