Nick Gillespie | November 1, 2007
David Harsanyi, author of the new book Nanny State and author of the November cover story in reason, "Prohibition Returns!: Teetotaling do-gooders attack your right to drink," is going to be, discussing risk aversion, "no fun" playgrounds, and the over-regulation of toys.
More info at the NBC Nightly News site.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Anything and everthing that can help the cops to keep us all safe is inherintly a good thing, I'm all for it.
Will this be on Reason tv? I'd love to see the interview, but don't think I can stomach more than a few minutes of tv nooze.
I doubt you'll get much from the 30 seconds allotted to him. Best bet is to catch a rerun of a recent C-Span book-tour gig. I'm sure they'll repeat it. Well worth it.
Ohhh, I hope someone posts a youtube (or whatever) link...i refuse to pay for cable and creepy commercials. I liked the story here with him writing very much.
No-fun playgrounds? I mean this sincerely -- it's my impression
that playgrounds have gotten significantly more awesome than they
were when I was a kid. And they don't seem any less dangerous. Lots
of opportunities for scrambling around and falling.
I have noticed that a lot of playgrounds now put some of the
squishy rubber padding on the ground beneath the equipment, but
that kind of seems like a good thing...
As a resident of the Denver metro area, I had the opportunity to hear David Harsanyi discuss his new book on a local NPR program called Colorado Matters. He presents a very level-headed and sane argument for resisting today's social engineering strategy of over-regulation. It's great he's getting this message out to the general public. And for the numskulls out there, his credibility is increased by the fact that he's a real, live, actual, parent!
I happened to catch this segment. It ran a good 45-60 seconds, but Hirsanyi got about 5.
I usually watch the first 11 minutes of Brian's show anyway, so
it wasn't that cruel and unusual for me to have to endure the whole
show tonite to catch this segment.
The segment itself seemed to have a lot of rubber padding around
it, but this is the "feel-good" time segment for all
networks.
What struck me was why was Harsanyi holding himself out to be an
expert on the subject?
That said, it was thought-provoking, considering the time slot, and
a flashing of nannyism mind-set can't be a bad thing.
"Some of the Thomas the Train toys - not all, but some - are
dangerous to the health of our children. And I say not all, but
some. Why should it be up to the moms and dads to be able to figure
that out? Is it too much to expect the government to live up to its
responsibility to protect our children?" ~~ Nancy Pelosi
Should we banish forks because a child might play with that and
poke it's eye out?
There is no clause in the Constitution that says that the Federal
Government has a right, power, or responsibility to babysit your
children for you. Maybe we should be encouraging people to be more
responsible parents, rather than continuing to take responsibility
out of their hands, and encouraging them to be lazy.
Brian Ewart,
Over on the legalize medical marijuana thread we were kicking
around having a "None of your business" amendment to the
Constitution.
Children are a parent's responsibility only.
Thomas the Tank Engine scandal was about lead content in the
paint and not that some dumbass kid poked her eye out cuz Daddy
wasn't watching her.
Home lead tests for paint don't work well at all - a little problem
with false positives but massive problems with false negatives.
Pelosi has a point here.
Lead is only dangerous if some dumbass kid likes putting shit in their mouth. And even then its not very dangerous.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245