David Weigel | September 24, 2007
The Politico's David Paul Kuhn chats up Norman Podhoretz, who reminisces about getting a private meeting with George W. Bush and urging him to bomb Iran.
“I did say to [the president], that people ask: Why are you spending all this time negotiating sanctions? Time is passing. I said, my friend [Robert] Kagan wrote a column which he said you were giving ‘futility its chance.’ And both he and Karl Rove burst out laughing.
“It struck me,” Podhoretz added, “that if they really believed that there was a chance for these negotiations and sanctions to work, they would not have laughed. They would have got their backs up and said, ‘No, no, it’s not futile, there’s a very good chance.’”
Podhoretz walked out of the meeting neither deterred nor assured the president would attack the Persian state.
Yet he believes, he said prior to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to New York for the United Nations’ General Assembly, that “Bush is going to hit” Iran before the end of his presidency.
The acceptable political center of this debate is apparently between Podhoretz's position and Mitt Romney's call to pre-emptively indict Ahmedinejad.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Of course Bush is going to attack Iran before the end of his
term.
He will consider it unfinished business and his "duty" to do so
prior to some "appeaser" taking the office away from him.
He will be enabled in doing this by the overly-broad language that
the chumps in the Congress allowed into the Authorization to Use
Military Force, and by the parade of Congressional resolutions
seeking to do "symbolic" things like declare Iran's armed forces a
terrorist organization.
Come on, there's nothing to stop this guy from doing exactly as he
pleases.
Is it not sad that a crazy person can get a private meeting with the President of the United States.
All the other foreign policy decisions this president has made have been so good that I dont' see what could possibly go wrong with this one.
I for one would like to see Bush attack Iran AFTER the end of his presidency. Wouldn't that be a sight?
Of course Bush is going to attack Iran before the end of his
term.
No way. Not in a godzillian years.
IRT the headline, can we call neo-cons "Pod People" now?
I for one would like to see Bush attack Iran AFTER the end of
his presidency. Wouldn't that be a sight?
Sort of a reverse Lincoln brigade. A Fools Crusade perhaps?
"I for one would like to see Bush attack Iran AFTER the end of
his presidency. Wouldn't that be a sight?"
I would totally pay for a first-class plane ticket for him if he
wanted to give it a go.
Well, it would be a solution of sorts to the call to withdraw from Iraq. "Look, we're leaving! Just moving a few miles to the east."
I would be willing to go to Iran and do reconnaissance on their baklava production facilities. That's a strategic resource that we must control.
Of course, I'll need significant discretionary funds for this
mission. My cover story shall be that I'm doing a special report
for Food Network.
Can we draft Rachel Ray to help me with this assignment?
"I've got just $40 to sample Tehran's best baklava!"
thoreau,
In all seriousness, I'd rather we invaded Iran than see Ms. Ray
become yet more overexposed. It's time for her to go away now.
No way. Not in a godzillian years.
I wish I could share that sentiment. But I've come to accept that
George Bush does not view the world the same was as everyone
else.
In his defense, it seems to work. No one seems to know what,
exactly, to do with him. A normal President would have slunk back
to the White House and just finished out 2006 to 2008 as a
caretaker after all this.
Bush? He's surrounded by the biggest hawks in the US, feeding him a
steady diet of destiny, glory, and God's desire for him to smite
the evil-doers of the Middle East. And right now, the Finger of
Fate is pointing squarely to Iran.
PL-
Oh my gravy! You did not just say that! Her $40/day show is
awesome. Delish!
:)
In his defense, it seems to work. No one seems to know what,
exactly, to do with him.
Fortune does favor the bold. He's not going to back down
voluntarily, and the Congress is too timid to use the only tools
they can use against him: impeachment and the power of the
purse.
If I may channel gaius marius for a moment, I would note that having the reason and ability to act, but not the willingness, is the very definition of decadence. So those polls that indicate that 70% of Americans want us out of Iraq yesterday, and then 70% don't want to cut off funds, should be setting off red flags in our heads.
What exactly does it mean to "go all Alton Brown on your ass"
asside from indicating that you have a very entertaining show that
focuses on one food item at a time and how to cook it
perfectly?
Now, going Paula Deen on your ass.. that I understand.
We could send Joshua Adam Garcia to Iran. He always wanted to be a Food Network star.
Reinmoose,
Fair question.
Let's begin with what it would not be. An Alton Brown attack would
not involve a unitasker. No sirree. It would likely involve a
scientific and thorough process, including several weapons produced
from components acquired from a hardware store. It's also likely
that we'd see some sort of overnight brining of the victim before
the attack.
It's also likely that we'd see some sort of overnight
brining of the victim before the attack.
It's called "enhanced interrogation", PL.
Of course Bush is going to attack Iran before the end of his
term.
No, he'll leave that to Bush III to finish the business of his
(her?) dad GWB! That is how they do it in the Bush family. One
starts one thing, and the other gets it done. But I guess it won't
be the Bush twins finishing the job -- Jeb may be? In a couple of
presidencies? How dumb would voters be if that happens.
thoreau,
Sure. Combine salt, ice, water, and time and get. . .truth. And
juicy turkey.
I think the US should attack Iran. For all the death and destruction, and even worse - high oil prices, it would be worth it just to see the expression on Jimmy Carter's face. (and the faces of the people that argued in 2003 "Iran is a greater threat")
PL -
It also would not involve turkey stuffing, although stuffing in
general is not out of the question.
Did someone call for a nutritional anthropologist? I know I
didn't.
Brent Snowcroft is betting that Bush isn't stupid enough to bomb Iran. Any takers?
Reinmoose,
Indeed. America draws the line at stuffing.
Look for W to offer us a new tool for dealing harshly with
physicists like thoreau.
I love Good Eats. Who else but Alton Brown would provide
his viewers with a
haggis recipe?
"If I may channel gaius marius for a moment, I would note that
having the reason and ability to act, but not the willingness, is
the very definition of decadence. So those polls that indicate that
70% of Americans want us out of Iraq yesterday, and then 70% don't
want to cut off funds, should be setting off red flags in our
heads."
Crimethink -- you're lumping together decadence with "not thinking
things through and developing a cohesive philosophy". Many of the
same people who say they want tax cuts and balanced budgets also
want spending increases. Many of the people who say they are so
ardently pro-choice that they defend abortions right up to delivery
would throw up if they saw a full term baby actually being aborted.
Many of the people who push hard for public schools and the taxes
to support them send their own kids to private schools and practice
tax evasion. Virtually everyone favors huge tax burdens, but would
be repulsed if they had to go door-to-door to their neighbors
collecting those taxes at gunpoint.
I have a nightmare where we bomb some buildings in Iran, and Iran comes unglued and invades Iraq, demanding our troops leave the region. So we chuck a nuke. And then nobody will trade with us and everyone has to walk to work.
John Kerry,
Nah, you're a doofus, too. I bet you put stuffing in the bird.
Jeez.
I'd put the odds of Bush starting another war at 60%. He certainly wants to, but the military may prevent it by explaining that unfortunately, it isn't feasible at this time. Congress isn't a factor.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245