Radley Balko | August 17, 2007
Bizarre story from Vermont, where bar owner Wayne Ryan is suing the police department over an incident last June.
Seems that two undercover police officers tried to enter the bar to check the IDs of a patrons in a sting on underage drinkers. Problem is, one of the officers himself forgot to bring ID, and was consequently denied admittance to the bar. Ryan eventually allowed the office in after confirming his identity with a superior (who threatened to shut the place down). Five days later, the police returned to arrest Ryan for impeding a police officer. The charge was eventually dismissed.
Ryan says the entire operation was retaliation for critical comments he made about the local police at a town council meeting.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Just want to throw this out there again: My shoulder is sore from a trap/skeet thing I went to last night, and it reminds me: Prepare, folks. The revolution cometh.
Imagine a private business harassing customers like the monopoly
police do. Recently the Conservative Supreme Court says they are
"professional" so the no knock warrant is ok.
Privatize the Cops!
I have to say that is a devilishly clever little scheme from the
local PD.
If he lets the cop in, you arrest him for failing to check IDs. If
he doesn't let the cop in, you arrest him for obstruction.
Brilliant.
The estimated population, in 2003, was 3,086.
How can anyone be undercover? Wouldn't everybody just say, "Hey,
Farva, how's it goin'?"
Was maple syrup involved?
These shenanigans are not cheeky and fun.
I only wish this story was bizarre. It sounds all too common, with police exercising a personal vendetta and finding a way to arrest a person no matter what they do. The bizarre part would be if there was any actual underage drinking going on at the bar.
Good thing that town has its own police force, and that they
have plenty to do.
I was very happy growing up in a small New England town with no
police (only the occasional drive through by state police).
The revolution cometh
In your dreams, my friend. And if the Night of the Long Knives does
rear it's ugly head, not only will you and I be on the wrong side
of the barricades, I'm willing to bet that what comes after will be
worse than what we have now.
To whatever extent the culture of freedom, self-reliance, and
minimal intrusion by the state existed, it does not exist AT ALL
any longer.
Besides, the pork has all the cool guns and armored vehicles.
Oh, I believe this is what Clint Bolick identifies as Grassroots
Tyranny.
Great book, BTW
The other day I sent a harsh email to my county supe for wasting
tax dollars sending a Sheriff's task force door to door checking
local businesses for proper licenses, permits, sales tax permits,
and worker's comp insurance. Especially galling in a county where
half the time 911 puts you on hold or you get a busy signal and you
know the cops ain't coming anyway.
Naturally, I used my throwaway email address. Just as naturally,
the supervisor's helper wanted me to identify myself so we could
have a dialogue. Which in English means: Code Enforcement would do
the dialogueing at my house.
Just cuz yer not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you
regards, TWC
Its funny that in a different case, the cops might threaten to bring in a civilian for using the same excuse of not having ID on them.
TWC, you lack-of-imagination-having killjoy. Sigh...
I do think one thing that would prevent an actual police state is
that there are almost as many guns as people in this country.
I do think one thing that would prevent an actual police
state is that there are almost as many guns as people in this
country.
So there's a reason for the 2nd Amendment? Go figure. Somebody
inform the Supreme Court before they decide the DC case.
My shoulder is sore from a trap/skeet thing I went to last
night, and it reminds me: Prepare, folks. The revolution
cometh.
Maybe you could just try putting some ice on it first.
"Besides, the pork has all the cool guns and armored
vehicles."
Shotgun loaded with 000 buckshot will deliver a hell of a punch,
and the satisfaction of knowing you're doing the right thing.
joe, for shotgun shoulder I go by the acronym RIPE: Rest, Ice, Prepare, Execute.
In a display of gross, personal incompetance, a police officer
forgets his ID and blames somebody else for having his work slowed
down.
This is yet another reason we should be able to bring civil suits
against solitary police officers. The taxpayers shouldn't have to
pay for incompetance.
Hey, that's the town where I saw Star Wars & Empire Strikes
Back when I was a wee bairn!
My local knowledge is a few decades out of date, but as I remember,
the local PD were pigs. They took up space, consumed tax dollars,
and were generally unhelpful. When my grandparents' house was
broken into and burglarized, the police made things worse. The
sheriff and his men swarmed through the house touching stuff and
ruining any chance of lifting usable fingerprints. They walked
through the footprints of the burlgar in the sand, obliterating
them, and then, to add to the injury, the sheriff made off with a
substantial amount of table-ware and towels, claiming that he
needed them for "evidence". My Grandmother was livid, since the
thieves hadn't taken any of the tableware or the towels.
We never saw the stuff again. BTW, the burglars continued to loot
and pillage with minimal police interference until they got drunk
and drove up the stem of a T intersection at 50 miles an hour and
smeared themselves across a few trees. Then the crime wave ended,
and the police took credit - I presume because unlike all the other
single-car accidents in that intersection that one was the
government's fault.
IDs?? We Don't Need No Stinking IDs!!
- The Treasure of Bellows Falls
Equally interesting H&R Topic would be the origin of the name for "BELLOWS FALLS"
76 at 2:00pm I guess answered, if only as speculation, what an officer is doing on duty without ID. You'd think he'd want it for multiple purposes, not least among which would be to assist medics and hospital staff in case he's wounded. Or maybe he has to drive somewhere, or maybe a citizen will want reassurance that he is indeed a cop... But perhaps rules are different for such undercover "work".
Man hit in
groin by football.
BTW, C'mon people! This is a post about cops in Vermont
ineptly running amok. Okay, meow. Do you know why I pulled
you over?
LibertyPlease | August 17, 2007, 1:41pm | #
"Besides, the pork has all the cool guns and armored vehicles."
Shotgun loaded with 000 buckshot will deliver a hell of a punch, and the satisfaction of knowing you're doing the right thing.
Preferably out of a converted Saiga with some spare 10 round
magazines.
There's no tyranny like local tyranny. It comes from requiring
very small constituencies to stay in power, and no one
caring.
At least Congressfolk have to appeal to hundreds of thousands, or
millions, of people.
Darn, I had guessed that the article was going to be about
Burlington. I suppose that Bellows Falls is near enough that it
counts...
Vermont- proof that socialism works, just look at our economy
p.s. Despite having thousands of movies the UVM media center does
not have Super Troopers... wtf?
"Preferably out of a converted Saiga with some spare 10 round magazines"
Hmmmm... I'll have to look into that. In the meantime, vote
Hillary! Let's get this over with!
I do think one thing that would prevent an actual police state
is that there are almost as many guns as people in this
country.
So there's a reason for the 2nd Amendment? Go figure. Somebody
inform the Supreme Court before they decide the DC case.
For this particular SC, I'd say that's a bug, not a feature.
For the Wine Commonsewer,
Why do you think the military will back up the politicians? I see
no logical linkage for this conclusion.
45-7-302. Obstructing peace officer or other public
servant.
(1) A person commits the offense of obstructing a peace officer or
public servant if the person knowingly obstructs, impairs, or
hinders the enforcement of the criminal law, the preservation of
the peace, or the performance of a governmental function, including
service of process.
(2) It is no defense to a prosecution under this section
that the peace officer was acting in an illegal manner,
provided that the peace officer was acting under the peace
officer's official authority.
I'm confused about what the cops WANTED to do.
They were there undercover to check ID's? Shouldn't they have been
in uniform for that job?
I don't know about you, but if a guy in civies walks up, says he's
a cop and demands to see my DL and won't show me his ID, I'm going
to tell him no because he's impersonating a police officer and is
probably there to rob and kill us. If he flashes a badge and his
police ID, MAYBE I will, but first I'd talk to the bartender to ask
what the hell?
Years ago at UCLA I was getting into by car when a smelly guy in
"homeless" clothes flashed a badge and demanded my handicapped
placard registration. I asked for his ID, he said "Dis badge all I
need." I had my legally carried glock cleared and pointed at him
through the door, out of his sight, before I told him that if he
didn't have ID I would assume he was fake. About that time his
partner, in uniform with radio, showed up. It seems they have a
"special enforcement" program with civilians, issued badges, just
for handicapped plackard enforcement. The boy never knew how close
he was to being shot.
Overstepping authority to make a point.
Where have we heard this before?
Now imagine what those cops would have done if you had taken their
pictures?
Or video??
Two comments up Montana Code makes a chilling observation.
Folks, stop bitching and go lay populist siege to your legislature
to change the laws. Why are you carping when you have options? Bad
laws get written by popular pressure; bad laws are reformed by
populist pressure. It ain't brain surgery and it ain't all that
hard.
And to the Vermont barkeep, godspeed, sir, and sue them into
fucking oblivion.
It is time to put the police and law abiding citizens on equal footing. By allowing law abiding citizens to carry assault rifles and machine guns openly in public not only will citizens be able to help those in need (stopping muggings, hold ups, rapes in progress and murders, and also homeless population reduction operations) but the civilians will be able to fight against corrupt police on equal terms.
I do think one thing that would prevent an actual police
state is that there are almost as many guns as people in this
country.
I know of several people who have small armories and enough bullets
to stand off the entire Canadian Military. It is surprising as well
that several of these people claim they would never surrender their
guns, choosing to go out in a hail of bullets.
Island Pond in the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont is known as one
of the five worst speed traps in the country. The local constable
makes it his business to pull over out of town folks for the
slightest infraction and charge fine big enought to make a
Califonia (or Massachusetts) cop blush.
We've forgotten that Government is often more evil, because it has
the power and we don't. VOTE LIBERTARIAN
For some time I have refrained form posting anti law enforcement
diatribes, but when cops do this sort of arrogant, "we're above the
law" crap my self restraint weakens. I might actaully post
FUCK THE POLICE! or something like that.
Just sayin', it could happen.
Ohio is an "Open Carry" state. According to the state
constitution, any weapon may be carried if openly displayed. In
1977 for example, I carried a shotgun two blocks down a busy
sidewalk from my car to the Western Auto store to get a recoil pad
fitted. No one I passed fainted, or called the cops, or ran for
cover, or even looked askance.
A passing Ravenna police car did not stop. When I walked into the
store, the clerks did not dive for the floor, or pull their own
weapons. Even though the law remains the same, I wonder how far I'd
get today.
The only solution to this is to strip police of their immunity from the law when they violate someone's rights. This immunity comes from state constitutions, so at least in states that have the initiative process it should be possible to do.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245