Kerry Howley | October 5, 2006
Finally, some money Congress managed not to spend last year! $20 million that Republicans set aside for a victory party -- you know, celebrating our victories in Iraq and Afghanistan -- has yet to be spent. AP reports:
The funds for "commemoration of success" in Iraq and Afghanistan were originally tucked into last year's defense measure, but they went unspent amid an uptick in violence in both countries that forced the Pentagon to extend tours of duty for thousands of troops.
When Democrats pointed out that a victory celebration was rather less helpful than a plan for victory, a spokesman for Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) argued that the bill passed unanimously, adding:
"Apparently they were for honoring the troops before they were against it."
So, the way for Congress to honor the troops is to plan elaborate parties while other people fight the war. Since that's the case, shouldn't Republicans have set aside more than $20 million? From what I gather watching reality television, that's the price of a low-end Sweet 16 party in Los Angeles.
Via To the People.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
For some idiotic reason I always equated supporting the troops with adequate post war treatment and counseling to transition them back to civilian life or post war life with their own families. I didn't know that it meant cheering the legisliars who set them against the civilian populations of foreign countries without clear moral guidelines. My do I feel foolish!
$20 Million...
That is a lot of booze and strippers.
They should just go ahead and have the celebration, and call it
something else.
Maybe the Foley/Hastert "going away" party.
"[A] victory celebration [i]s rather less helpful than a plan
for victory."
That's funny. As much as I dislike political snippery, it's one of
those things that makes too much sense to disregard as mere
partisan bickering. A plan for victory would be nice. For only
$10,000,000, I'm willing to spend the next year coming up with
one.
It is sort of "Decline and Fall of Rome," isn't it? Budgeting a
victory party while the military situation is deteriorating? But we
live in an age where emotional events are planned and programmed
for the masses by the State just as they were by the Church a
couple of centuries ago.
My sister made the point that what made 9/11 so fascinating was the
the elites had no narrative to accompany it. No spin, no
explanation, no one to tell us what to feel. It was so unexpected
that we were all left on our own to sort things out. The TV
commentators were reduced to simply repeating what was happening
without any information other than what was in the video
feed.
That night when I went to work I got a new view of my coworkers who
were forced to process the event without the benefit of State
intervention. One of them startled me by giving the opinion that
every city could use a couple of airliners smashed into it,
starting with the lawyers' offices. Another, whom I had mistaken
for common trailer trash, expressed concern for Middle Eastern
immigrants. "They're going to have a sleepless night," he
said.
When the victory celebration is held, and it will be, regardless of
the outcome of the wars, there will be huge press coverage and many
assertions of how Americans are proud of their fighting men and
therefore proud of their war and the government that started it.
You can tell they are because so many of them came out for the
parade. And people will always turn out for a parade. That's why
they have them.
Shouldn't they have deducted a few hundred bucks for the White
House's "Mission Accomplished" banner on the Abraham Lincoln? And
that Marine tank must have burned some gas pulling down the Saddam
statue.
Unless there's a change of course soon, the White House is going to
have to digitally edit soldiers into the video of the victory
celebration, like in Braveheart.
With Hannity hosting, chickenhawks wil;l trample each other for good seats......
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245