Julian Sanchez | October 2, 2006
You may have already seen the story making the blogospheric rounds about the Texas art teacher whose contract was cancelled because (she claims) parents complained after she took her fifth grade class to a museum containing bare naked marble—in particular Rodin's "Shade," Malliol's "Flora," and the, uh, not exactly pornographic "Star in a Dream" by Jean Arp . But reader Loretta just pointed me toward the New York Times account of the story, which contains yet more damning proof of local school officials' philistinism: They apparently upbraided the teacher for wearing "flip flops" to work, when in fact she had on Via Spiga sandals. Whatever became of culture? [x-posted @ NftL]
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I have long since held that the only thing worse than the teachers in public schools were the administrators, most of the parents, and most of the students. Still more anecdotal evidence in support of such a theory.
On two different occasions the NYTimes article references
"additional complaints, which Ms. McGee has challenged" and "(the)
superintendent told parents in their e-mail message Wednesday,
citing 'performance concerns' and other criticisms of Ms. McGee's
work."
Wouldn't it be good to have those facts before we chastise the
school board?
Given the difficulty of firing teachers, as illustrated in the
current issue of Reason magazine, maybe the Dallas school
board should be applauded for its bravery in attempting to fire a
bad employee, rather then immediately made out to be the
Gestapo.
I'll probably turn out to be wrong, but I sure as hell ain't gonna
take the NYTimes' word for it.
Well, the teacher also says that she's got a long history of positive performance reviews, which she's got copies of, and that all these other performance complaints arose after the museum trip. I don't know whether, as she seems to suggest, those complaints are purely pretextual, but it would be quite unusual for a teacher with years of commendable service under her belt to get the axe in the wake of one or two bad reviews unless she'd dones something really egregious.
How else are the children going to learn that tits are okay in
public provided certain framing rules are followed.
These rules are obscure and take a lot of exposure to work
themselves in.
Even the parents are unaware of them, showing a generation of
failed schools with not enough museum field trips.
Watch out for late Picasso.
In the early 80s, a guy at work brought in a 3' high statue of a
nude lady, a piece of faux art, that he wanted to get rid of. It
sat in his office for a while, and then we moved it to the company
courtyard, where it sat among lunchers for about a month, before
somebody had it removed in a huff.
The art frame is not easily broken, but there's always somebody who
doesn't get it.
If she can afford those sandals, I don't want to hear any further complaining about teachers' pay.
School officials have not named the child who complained or
any particular artwork at issue, although Ms. McGee said her
puzzlement was compounded when Ms. Lawson referred at times to "an
abstract nude sculpture."
So, we can fire a teacher because an unnamed parent complains about
a unnamed child complaining about an unidentified work of art in a
museum?
"You're fired!"
"Why?"
"Because."
"Because why?"
"Exactly."
"I'll probably turn out to be wrong, but I sure as hell
ain't gonna take the NYTimes' word for it."
Yeah, Ima gonna get me uh knife 'n' sit onna couch an' yell up a
sandstorm at thems libral newspapers on the TV set.
Lamar-Given the Times' relatively recent spate of journalistic screw-ups, I don't think being skeptical of that paper is equivalent to being a slackjawed yokel.
"Rodan" (Giant Bird Lizard Thing, "Godzilla's Flying Buddy") does not equal "Rodin" (Sculpture, "Creator of 'The Thinker'")
" "Rodan" (Giant Bird Lizard Thing, "Godzilla's Flying Buddy")
does not equal "Rodin" (Sculpture, "Creator of 'The
Thinker'")"
Guess I shouldn't have skipped the Rodan Museum when I was in
Paris....
Lamar, it must have been my use of the word "ain't" that threw
your delicate sensibilities into a tizzy. Please forgive me, for I
have used a word recognized by Lamar to be unfit for online
conversational purposes. You see, Lamar is probably a lawyer. He
will tell you himself if you just give him time. You have to
understand that Lamar is at a disadvantage. You see, online we
can�t tell he is a lawyer by the car he drives, the way he parts
his hair on the side, and the ever so hip pinstripe suit that is
all the rage in his men�s magazines he keeps on his nightstand.
Here, online, Lamar has to prove he is witty, intelligent, and
�snarky� rather than letting us all know by looking at him. Our
loss, really.
As the mighty lawyer, Lamar probably regards language as
civilization�s foremost safeguard. I have broken that trust with
the use of that southern colloquialism, �ain�t.� It shall not be
done again.
By the way Lamar, how do you feel about coming to conclusions
without having most of the facts, which was, by the way, the crux
of my post. You seem just intelligent enough to make me
curious.
As far as I can tell, the school board doesn't claim that the nude art wasn't a reason for her firing; they're claiming that it was only one of the reasons for her firing. Which is as much of an excuse as saying, "I'm not firing you just because you're black, I'm firing you because you're black and you're not doing a good job".
It is not unusual for school boards to give unreasonable weight to a single complaint, warranted or not, from a patron. In fact, that is how we end up with many of the goofy rules and procedures teachers and administrators are forced to navigate in an attempt to provide students with the opportunity for a quality education.
I have been to public schools for 13 years (in Germany, there is
no private alternative) and hell, our schools have problems, too
(immigration, integration, not good equipped, no good techer/pupils
ratio), but the American schools seem to beat us over the head. You
could easily win the contest of most humorous and stupid public
schools in the world...
If it weren't so sad...
Well, the implications will arise in a few years, when immigration
is further limited in the US and so all the brains turn to other
countries (China, India etc.) and you only can rely on what you
brought up yourselves.. I hope then someone in the state deparment
will be shortened a few centimeters.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245