David Weigel | September 18, 2006
Maybe I've just been left starry-eyed by that David Icke video, or maybe this "exclusive" report of a terrorist plot from WorldNetDaily is a minor work of art - a perfect synthesis of war-on-terror wingnuttery wrapped up in a bow and painted with a mustache. You've got:
- an interview with a shadowy terrorist from a fringe
website
- Muslims being told to flee the targeted areas in a hush-hush
operation even sneakier than the Mossad-Jews one
- WMD being smuggled over the Mexican border for a terrorist attack
in, uh, New York
And the WND source, Abu Dawood, is almost charmingly naive.
(President) Bush is aware that brother Adnan has smuggled deadly materials inside America from the Mexican border. Bush is silent about him, because he doesn't want to panic his people.
Stuff like this reminds me how the mainstream media doesn't quite get the way terrorism plays around the country. There's a reason why Food Lion shelf-stackers in Lincoln, Nebraska are even more worried about terrorism than Manhattanites. It's not far removed from the reason Sightings got such boffo ratings. (I tried to tackle similar themes in a review of several war on terror sci-fi novels.)
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Remember, kids, if you've got a functioning nuclear device and
you want to use it to attack a nuclear city, follow these easy
steps:
1. Smuggle it into Mexico
2. Hijack a crop duster. I'm not exactly sure how one hijacks a
crop duster, as opposed to stealing it, but anyway...
3. Fly said crop duster into US airspace across an international
border.
This is like a terrorist plot as planned by Douglas Feith.
Earlier this year the World Net Daily ran a story that Iran was
6 days away from having the bomb. They said someone in the State
Department presented that claim, but he didn't. It went something
like this.
State Department official claims Iran had a goal of making a large
number of centrifuges. (around 52,000 I think.
At the time Iran was known to have around 1,500 (I think).
The official claimed that if Iran had it's goal number of
centrifuges (52,000) it would take them 6 days to make enough
enriched urainium for a bomb.
The writer of the WND story failed to understand that Iran did not,
at the time have the "goal" number of centrifuges. The claim of his
article was false.
I guess reading comprehension is not a requirement for WND. And
they talk badly about the NY Times.
According to the Food Lion store finder there are no stores within 50 miles of Lincoln Nebraska. As a matter of fact there are no Food Lions in all of Nebraska. Did World Net Daily get to them too?
Is this to say red state bubbas are bigger morons than blue state city slickers?
Why do I suspect that the difference between "hijacking a crop duster" and "stealing a crop duster" involves being Muslim?
Hey everybody, can you keep a secret? I have a TOP-SECRET PLAN to BLOW UP NEW YORK CITY. The bomb is HIDDEN IN THE 42ND STREET SUBWAY STATION and SET TO GO OFF THIS FRIDAY AT NOON. Tell all your friends to get out of Manhattan, but don't tell anybody else, okay? It's a secret. Shhhhhh!
Hey everybody, can you keep a secret? I have a TOP-SECRET PLAN to BLOW UP NEW YORK CITY. The bomb is HIDDEN IN THE 42ND STREET SUBWAY STATION and SET TO GO OFF THIS FRIDAY AT NOON. Tell all your friends to get out of Manhattan, but don't tell anybody else, okay? It's a secret. Shhhhhh!
My mom, who lives in suburban Dayton, was conviced terrorists
would blow up her subdivision well past the 2004 election. (High
five for scaring old ladies Dubya!) She's even got some duct tape
somewhere. It is or was a rather wide-spread sentiment. Based on
anecdote it seems more common the less likely you are to be a
target.
I guess it's part of that thing about people, they always imagine
themselves dying in melodramatic and unlikely ways rather than
heart disease or car wrecks.
It would be nice if maybe Reason could do a roundup/analysis of
all the "Mexico/Immigration issue is part of War on Terror"
bullsh*t thats out there. Like the "Al-Qaeda/MS13" nexus that is
tossed around constantly.
Maybe the current opinion is, "its way too dumb for us to even
grant any degree of serious attention"
I agree - but unfortunately, a lot of people are swallowing this
stuff whole. My dad, a retired marine capt, ex-lawyer, who normally
is mr-"I-know-the-facts", actually pushed this one at me. He has
been living alone for last 10yrs and spends a lot of time with Bill
O'Rielly, Limbaugh, et al. And he characterizes his neighbors as
"far more concerned about it than me" - that is, about Latinos
joining the global Jihad against white people. Which is pretty damn
depressing.
All these MS13 stories that I've seen use as their lynchpin the
rumor that this dude Shukrijumah was "seen" in Honduras meeting
with MS13 leaders. By whom, it's never said.
Apparently the FBI has tried to point out more than once that they
have never had a single piece of evidence, and neither has anyone
in justice department indicating that this even MIGHT be true. They
have no evidence he was in Honduras at all. They do not know of
sources that do.
http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/8/22/1813/48492
It's true that in 2004 justice was concerned about this guy maybe
being in the US... but not specifically that he was the vanguard of
the Latino/Islamic partnership... a la "Red Dawn II".
Anyway, these stories never go into any analysis of what, if any,
interests these two groups would have in common, or how/why Al-Q
would need a loosely-structured group of gang bangers to do their
dirty work. Aside from the fact that "not being named Abdul Al
Masri Mustafa Jihad" is convenient.
But seriously - I think the whole story there, front to back, has
been invented wholsale by GOP flaks. Seriously. Quotes and all.
Call me paranoid Kos-ite or something, but this seems way too
obviously contrived. WorldNet, quoting a pakistani journo, quoting
some guy in afghanistan, who simply says, "those rumours you
Americans have heard on WorldNet? They are all true. We are going
to blow you up from Mexico. Viva la Raza!"
It's also basically the same #$(&% template as the Mohammed
Atta-in-Prague-meets-Iraqi-Intelligence canard.
It's a frappe of domestic and foreign-policy strong points for GOP
= domestic xenophobia, economic worries can be harnessed and
funneled into support for War on Terror policy.
Plus, having a new scary-named domestic 'terrorist' organization
can't hurt. Al-Q has become so banal. We need a new legion of doom.
Even though from what i've seen about MS13 (60minutes piece) is
that they consist almost entirely of 13-18yr old central american
kids who mostly just kick each others ass, tag neighborhoods, smoke
weed, scare whitey.
JG
I've noticed that concern that terrorists are going to blow up
Wal Mart tends to correlate closely with the belief that being told
"Happy Holidays" by that Wal Mart's employees is part of an
anti-Christian conspiracy.
If there's bully picking on you, it's ok to hit him back. Or even
to pre-empt.
I've noticed that concern that terrorists are going to blow up
Wal Mart tends to correlate closely with the belief that being told
"Happy Holidays" by that Wal Mart's employees is part of an
anti-Christian conspiracy.
If there's bully picking on you, it's ok to hit him back. Or even
to pre-empt.
What if the bad guys build a lunar base with a giant "laser" and threaten to incinerate our entire country?
"And that reason would be...?"
i presume he's referring to media consumption patterns. it is kinda
strange - people didn't travel from conneticut or new jersey to
take photos of their family in front of ground zero, but folks from
'merica did. i can't tell you why any of them did it, either -
maybe it is like visiting the set of a famous tv show.
unreality makes its own monsters.
What if the bad guys build a lunar base with a giant "laser"
and threaten to incinerate our entire country?
I believe the technical term in international law for what we'd do
is "unconditional surrender".
Speaking of technological terrors, perhaps the saving grace of this
war on terror is that terrorists and nations like Iran are
increasingly looking to technology to narrow the military
capability gap with the West. That may result in some not-so-subtle
changes in their overall outlook. I believe that our opponents will
find that it'll take more than money to truly establish a
technologically advanced military than can hold its own over the
long term--they'll need a supporting industrial infrastructure.
Simply moving in that direction will almost certainly liberalize
things in the Middle East to some degree. More wealth in a greater
number of hands is likely to make people feel that they have more
to lose when wackos are allowed to run around provoking military
responses.
"What if the bad guys build a lunar base with a giant "laser"
and threaten to incinerate our entire country?"
Any chance we could convince these bad guys to take over the
reconstruction of Iraq?
Paging Dr. Evil... Paging Dr. Evil...
Your volcano lair is ready, complete with man-eating sharks with
lasers attached to their heads.
"I guess it's part of that thing about people, they always
imagine themselves dying in melodramatic and unlikely ways rather
than heart disease or car wrecks."
True enough. As a kid growing up during the end of the Cold War I
was always struck by the fact that everybody seemed to believe that
if the Russians leaned on the big red button that their particular
town would be the first to go.
"""WorldNet, quoting a pakistani journo, quoting some guy in
afghanistan, who simply says, "those rumours you Americans have
heard on WorldNet? They are all true"""
Hearsay as proof, it's becoming all the rage. WND is big on hearsay
and speculation as proof to their conclusions. They think they are
great, but they would lose a Jr. High school debate with eighth
graders.
Gangs such as MI13 are more interested in selling drugs and power
over the people in their turf. The Tony Montanya (sp?) scarface
wannabes. I doubt they would be intrested in anything that would
scare off their buisness or harm their control such as terrorism.
Unless they can benefit, they won't be interested.
Gilmore, your old man sounds just like mine. Here's a guy who
understood (i think) Goldwater and Buckley, who read the Founders,
who thought about the deeper implications of the the Republics
founding philosophies. . And worked all his life, I suppose you
would call him blue collar. had to apply his politics to everyday
life, rather than have then within a academic or priveledged
barricade.
Now, hes a complete, gullible, talk radio parrot. Gets his facts
from the Daily News & the Moonie paper, and cant defend a
single position he takes with any clarity.
And hes not at all alone in this. You'd think folks in thier
60-80's have seen & heard enough to have, at long last, some
skeptical thought processes in play, but evidently not.
Im at the point I dont trust anyone over 65 or under 45.....
"Apparently the FBI has tried to point out more than once that
they have never had a single piece of evidence, and neither has
anyone in justice department indicating that this even MIGHT be
true. They have no evidence he was in Honduras at all. They do not
know of sources that do."
Well, if you read WorldNet Daily on a regular basis, you'd realize
that the FBI and CIA are controlled by Islamofacist sympathizers
who constantly cover up evidence of terrorist acts (see, e.g., TWA
800, forest fires, power outages, etc., etc.). Obviously this is
just part of the pattern. It's only because of nameless, noble,
Jack Bauer-like field agents who struggle against their corrupt
superiors that we learn the truth through reliable, independent
news services like WND, LGF, Freep, etc.
SR-
WND should pay more attention to Shannon Love. Shannon could
explain that reporting on terrorist acts is precisely the problem.
So WND is part of the problem, and those who cover up The Truth are
part of the solution.
As a kid growing up during the end of the Cold War I was
always struck by the fact that everybody seemed to believe that if
the Russians leaned on the big red button that their particular
town would be the first to go.
That was true in my town too, but since we lived about three miles
from the Pentagon, I trust we can be forgiven for our paranoia.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245