Jacob Sullum | May 25, 2006
Applying the same logic that is used to claim that smoking bans cause immediate, dramatic reductions in heart attacks, Michael Siegel finds that "sharp cuts in funding for anti-smoking programs" in Nebraska and South Carolina produced similar results.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
R C Dean|5.25.06 @ 11:15AM|#
If it saves one life . . .
|5.25.06 @ 4:56PM|#
You watch. That life saved will be the next Hitler.
SHUDDUP GODWIN!