Julian Sanchez | June 17, 2005
When Oxfam began sending in relief vehicles to Sri Lanka to help with post-tsunami reconstruction (none were manufactured locally), the government understandably waived import duties... for the first four months. But now:
Britain's Daily Telegraph said Sri Lankan customs had charged $5,000 a day while the vehicles were processed.
Oxfam was given the choice of handing over the vehicles to the government, re-exporting them or paying the 300% import tax.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Didn't the original Band-aid run into this problem in Ethiopia?
If I can recall from my HS econ class when we looked at its
problems: the ethiopian govt taxed the imported food aid, refused
to give transport, taxed and then demanded ownership of the
subsequent truck imports, and then would only let them go as far as
central Ethiopia to distribute (the worst of the famine was in the
south) lest the rebels get ahold of the food and trucks. Damn those
gift horses.
In other news, at least the Sri Lankan govt is going to
share the tsunami aid with the Tamil Tigers. I'm sure they'll
put the funds to good use.
Remember, when you donate to charity, the terrorists win.
The thing is, this tariff cannot even be justified by protectionism since, as the article expressly notes, Sri Lanka has NO FREAKIN' DOMESTIC MOTOR VEHICLE INDUSTRY!!! Sheesh!!
Reminds me of the story I heard (no idea as to veracity) about
the building of the Meadowlands in NJ.
Preliminary tests revealed massive concentrations of mercury in the
soil from nearby factories (NJ does have mercury contents from the
pharmaceuticals, which used mercury in an anti-microbial for
liquids and gels). So the government, looking to build a safe
sporting facility, sends out for bids for remediation.
Surprise! The National Spanish Mining Company says we'll do it for
FREE, if you let them keep the mercury they recover. NJ ecstatic,
and negotiations begin to take off like a rocket. Almost all the i
s are dotted and t s crossed when NSMC says they don't want to pay
employer's share of income tax for work done on site.
Needless to say, this was a dealbreaker for NJ, which decided that
just paving over everything for several acres would be just as
good.
From the article:
...the aid had been duty-free until the end of April but was
now needed to prevent "market distortions."
Yeah right - more like tariffs are needed to "prevent distortion"
of the inept government's effort to keep the Sri Lankan people
poor.
....employer's share of income tax.... -
quasibill
What is that supposed to be, the employer's half of the Social
Security tax (FICA)?
Kevin
SR,
No doubt the Sri Lankan government would counter that the fact that
they have no domestic industry must mean that the tarrif is too low
... :)
Just another commerce clause argument; I don't know what everyone is bitching about.
tarran, ah yes, thank you , I see now. If only the Sri Lankan government would ban all imports of motor vehicles, Colombo could be the next Detroit.
The percentage of the tax may seem unreasonable, but the reason
for taxation is to force the NGO to use local resources. This not
only applies to vehicles, but also manpower and building
materials.
Now, in terms of the vehicles...SL has NO shortfall of 4X4 vehicles
and other heavy utlizity machines that can be easily rented. The
rental fees are quite reasonable and these machines are widely
available. I rented a Pajero Jeep (Mitsubishi Montero) in SL for
22000 per/month, thats about 250$!!!!!!!
Anyway, the country has vehicles, and goods have been transported
for many decades prior to the Tsunami and even after the Tsunami.
So I truly wonder why OXFAM bought these vehicles and who made the
commission??????? :)
SA
Toronto CA
Charity is profitable business
It is sad to note how many ignorant readers blindly believe that
all their donations to charity organizations really end up as help
to the people in effected.
In reality, usually only 50-60% of the collected money ever leaves
the walls of these organizations and gets distributed to the
affected people ?the other part the organization uses it self. This
is a big and very profitable business. Even by buying 25 vehicles
here and sending over there, one can make a hefty profit out of
your charity money. But, why cry foul when they have to divide the
profits. Trying to defame the Sri Lankan government is
pathetic.
By the way, the Sri Lankan government still haven't touched over
US$4 billion Tsunami aid pledged to that country.
Trying to defame the Sri Lankan government is
pathetic.
The Sri Lankan government defames itself by keeping Sri Lankans
poor in a modern world which, as Ron Bailey pointed out in this
very good article a while back, Poor Planning: How to
achieve the miracle of poverty, takes effort. Trade is good for
both sides and the only road out of poverty for the third world
(and yes, unfortunately many charities often do less good for the
intended beneficiaries than for themselves, but that is irrelevant
to the point about poor governance). By defending third world
policies that, like tariffs, restrict trade, you are defending
those that perpetuate poverty. Now that is
pathetic.
To the comment by: Brian Courts
It is absurd to use the yardstick of per capita GDP figures alone
(as Ron Bailey points out) to decide if a country is rich or poor.
In USA and many European countries a fair number of people live in
poverty.
If you compare UNDP's country data you would see that Sri Lanka's
populations' life expectancy, child deaths rate, literacy and many
other aspects show much better figures than even some European
countries. The WHO commissioners have commended the efficiency of
the well-organized health system in managing the Tsunami crisis.
Even by pc literacy and IT penetration Sri Lanka is ranked at 36th
in the world.
If a government has managed to make achievements in the social
sector by improving the level of wellbeing and advancement among
the population, this, in spite of all the economic devastations
caused by over 20 years of civil war - then that is good
governance!
Other than the continuing wars, unfortunately, in many cases, some
rich countries create obstacles for the development of 'poor'
countries as well: by way of sponsoring civil wars, creating
internal political strife, various trade regulations etc.
My point was that all the countries in the world use trade tariffs,
trade restrictions etc to protect something or other ( even
ecology). And in Sri Lanka duties regarding the import of heavy
vehicles was there before the Tsunami. The government had given a 4
months tariff free period after the Tsunami. Charities cannot be
allowed to play havoc in countries; they should learn to obey and
account for the rules known in advance.
It is now known that a lot of charities are careless in their work.
Perhaps, The biggest recent scandal being when Red Cross in Canada
pleaded guilty to distributing blood contaminated with HIV and
hepatitis C. This mismanagement by an international charity
organization killed over 3000 people and infected over 20,000 in
Canada.
A convicted US child-molester was only recently found running a
charitable children?s orphanage in Sri Lanka!!
It is now known that a lot of charities are careless in
their work. Perhaps, The biggest recent scandal being when Red
Cross in Canada pleaded guilty to distributing blood contaminated
with HIV and hepatitis C. This mismanagement by an international
charity organization killed over 3000 people and infected over
20,000 in Canada.
well, at least they have the Canadian health care system to help
them out.
A convicted US child-molester was only recently found running a
charitable children?s orphanage in Sri Lanka!!
Well, you can't argue that he doesn't love children...
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245