Brian Doherty | February 18, 2005
The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of MDMA (the drug more colloquially known as ecstasy) for U.S. vets from Iraq and Afghanistan suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (formerly more colloquially known as shell shock). This is part of an encouraging trend in the scientific normalization of formerly forbidden psychedelic and empathogenic substances.
[Link via Rational Review.]
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Ecstasy works good for nontroubled people as well. Its a nice
release now and then.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of MDMA
(the drug more colloquially known as ecstasy) for U.S. vets from
Iraq and Afghanistan suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder
symptoms (formerly more colloquially known as shell
shock).
How about for victims of rape or when a close loved one dies? Can X
mend a broken heart?
The X buzz certainly last longer and its a better, cleaner high than getting drunk!
Is this really a good idea? You have people that are under severe stress and their mind is probably not working normally. Ive tried X before and it changes you a little bit. So I think if you give X to a person whose brain isn't functioning right that might mess them up even more.
Ive tried X before and it changes you a little bit. So I
think if you give X to a person whose brain isn't functioning right
that might mess them up even more.
The idea is to "change you a little bit." This isn't
take-it-in-your-living-room- and-hope-you-feel-better thing.
They're giving it to the soldiers in a clinical setting with a
psychiatrist to help them work through their PTSD, and the ecstasy
is only a part of the overall therapy.
For a comprehensive review of future, present, and past ecstasy
research, check out the Multidisciplinary Association for
Psychedelic Studies Research Page.
"Shell Shock" is is a misnomer: the concussion effects of
exploding shells are physical effects that fade quchkly. The
psychological effects of prolonged stress are very different. Oddly
enough until about 1990, only the Israeli army had a clear idea of
how to deal with them and they got this data from the Imperial
German Army! After WWI, the Gewrmans studied the fabled "shell
shock" and dicovered that it was very different from the
convnetional wisdom:
a) It was not caused by explosions, but by prolonged stress.
b) There was no such thing as "battle hardening", in fact, the
stress was cumulative.
c) Training could mitigate the symptoms, but almost all would
succumb at some point [360 days of combat is the rule of
thumb].
d) To avoid destructive [often fatal] guilt in individuals who
succumb, it must not be treated as a "phycological flaw", or,
worse, a "lack of moral fibre", but as a type of wound inflicted by
emey action.
The Germans and Israelis officially termed it "exhaustion", while
we now refer to it as some variant of "stress injury". Everybody
uses terms that are not indicative of any weakness on the part of
the victim. As one Combat Stress Counselor said to me in the
Balkans: "Expecting the mind to resist battlefield stress is like
expecting flesh to resist bullets. Above all, we must not blame
these guys for failing to resist the irresistable - or let them
blame themselves."
Using "medication" to relieve the "pain of the injury" is fully in
keeping with the whole idea of stress injuries not being a part of
"nut ward #8". I'm told that some counselors even say "Look this
required stress counselling is a bunch of BS, but we have to go
through the motions, it's a requirement for out-processing. So,
have a drink and let me tell you about Viet Nam ..." [they were ALL
combat veterans in that Stress Control outfit]
"They're giving it to the soldiers in a clinical setting with a
psychiatrist to help them work through their PTSD, and the ecstasy
is only a part of the overall therapy."
Dude, bad trip!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245