Reason.com
CPAC Blogging: Rove Edition
Political uberguru Karl Rove just spoke and made an, uh... interesting case for a Bush mandate. First, we learn that Bush had the highest vote total in history. Meaning, as you'll be glad to learn, that the population is growing. Reminds me a bit of how Hollywood keeps generating news about box office record breakers by refusing to adjust box reciepts for inflation. Then we learn that he's got the highest vote percentage of any democratic president since the 60s. Which might be relevant if there hadn't been a major third party contender in both of Clinton's elections. Recall, after all, that Clinton's margin over Dole was a whopping seven points. But let's not get into talking about margins.
Now, since 'm not particularly fond of the recent D presidents either, I don't have a dog in the "my mandate is bigger than your mandate" fight. But this kind of stretching just seems sad.
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
- Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism (5.26)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|2.19.05 @ 11:10PM|#
I don't care how many days it's been, I'm putting my two cents in.
Major third party candidates don't sprout from the ground every seventeen years like cicadas, they appear when enough people are dissatisfied with the top two candidates. So I think it's fair to take into account the presence of Perot when evaluating Clinton's popularity (which is not to say, of course, that he was less popular than Kerry, Gore, Dukakis et al.).
|2.20.05 @ 9:15PM|#
Well, when you consider that John Kerry got the second most votes ever, it's hard to call this a mandate.