Julian Sanchez | January 13, 2005
Here's some qualified good news. Before the passage of the 1996 welfare reform bill, opponents made some fairly dire predictions—a million more children thrown into poverty, that kind of thing. When that didn't happen, plenty of folks (not wholly unreasonably) suggested that the economic boom had cushioned the blow, but that it was only delaying the inevitable—just wait. This Urban Institute survey of employment and wage data finds that the recession (unsurprisingly) hit working single mothers hard, but didn't erase the gains of the previous years.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|1.13.05 @ 2:40PM|#
Three cheers for Clinton!
heh heh, don't everybody jump at once.
|1.13.05 @ 10:18PM|#
I predict that privitizing social security will end the country as we know it. This article is money considering all the hysterical comments and long wannabe nostradamus dire predictions I've read on this site on the issue.