Reason.com
What Should the "Journalist's Privilege" Be?
Eugene Volokh has some ideas about a murky but important and pressing legal issue, and adds: "In any event, the rules should be the same for old media and new, professional and amateur. Any journalist's privilege should extend to every journalist."
Most Popular Stories
- St. Louis Cops Worry That In-Car Cameras 'Are Being Used Against Them' (5.23)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- Reason "Hero of Freedom" Larry Flynt's Latest Stunt? Photoshopping a Penis into Mouth of Conservative Pundit S.E. Cupp (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Plastic Bag Ban Will Put Los Angeles In Landfill (5.23)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
coyote|12.2.04 @ 5:57PM|#
I am tired of journalistic privilege trumping all other laws. This is particularly true in the recent case of leaking secret Balco grand jury testimony to the press.
|12.2.04 @ 6:07PM|#
There's something a bit perverse about the idea of a "Journalist's Privilege".
If someone tells me something in confidence, asking me to keep it a secret, I can be forced to reveal who told me and exactly what I was told.
On the other hand, if he tells me something intending for me to relay it to 100,000 subscribers, then the conversation should be protected?
Skip Oliva|12.3.04 @ 1:54AM|#
If the journalists who wrote the BALCO story directly received their information about the grand jury proceedings from any government official, then the journalists should be criminally prosecuted. They aided and abeted a crime, and, more appalling to me, they acted as an instrument of unconstitutional and immoral state power.
|12.3.04 @ 9:19AM|#
Skip, what would you suggest be done to the government officials who provided the information (as per your hypothetical)?
cheers,
Shirley Knott
Skip Oliva|12.3.04 @ 9:35AM|#
Shirley--
I would strip them of their citizenship and expel them from the country.
|12.3.04 @ 12:08PM|#
Can reporters go to jail for not revealing sources? My memory suggests that contempt charges and 6 months has been awarded for a few. If this is true then there is no privelege, other than the one claimed by reporters and protected by their willingness to go to jail. Any citizen can do that.
If the law isn't enforced then there might be other reasons, such as the public not really minding leaks that inform the public. Or, as in this case the revelation that theirs steroid use in baseball. Who'd of thunk it?