Reason.com
Most Popular Stories
- St. Louis Cops Worry That In-Car Cameras 'Are Being Used Against Them' (5.23)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- Reason "Hero of Freedom" Larry Flynt's Latest Stunt? Photoshopping a Penis into Mouth of Conservative Pundit S.E. Cupp (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Plastic Bag Ban Will Put Los Angeles In Landfill (5.23)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|6.30.04 @ 2:42AM|#
I can recall a piece on the Pittsburgh jitney gypsies in one of the first issues of Reason I ever read, in the ...early 80's?.. I think? Some things don't change much. There is also the battle over the unlicensed "dollar commuter vans" in New York City that Institute for Justice took up.
Kevin
|6.30.04 @ 3:29AM|#
Is there a semi-reasonable reason why cabs are regulated?
Highway|7.1.04 @ 8:31AM|#
I'm not an expert on cab licensing, but there are plenty of semi-reasonable reasons that are used to defend cab regulations. These include minimum safety standards for vehicles, vetting of drivers, and allowing an avenue of recourse against fraudulent drivers (who would, say, drive you around where you aren't going or other things). However, the form the regulations end up taking becomes more of a protection scheme for the cab companies and drivers who are already in it, due to the limitations on licensing that are usually enacted. Thus, the regulations present a severe (if not insurmountable) barrier to entry by new companies and independents, which is probably just the way the people in the business want it.
|7.2.04 @ 4:32AM|#
I think the only regulation that's really needed in any town's cab industry is a requirement for insurance. Any sane insurance company would require that the driver is fit, safe and sane, and that the car receive regular safety inspections.
Any regulation needed beyond that would be strictly minor, dealing with things like meter calibration & the like -- all stuff a cab operator could probably take care of in just a few hours every year.
Highway is probably right that the regulations usually turn into a protection scheme for existing companies -- New York City's medallion system being a prime example.