Ronald Bailey from the July 2011 issue
“Overreaction to risk is
frequently found in the environmental realm,” according to a study
by Cass Sunstein and Richard Zeckhauser in the March issue of the
journal Environmental and Resource Economics. We needed a
study to show that?
Sunstein, on leave from a post at Harvard Law School, and Zeckhauser, a Harvard political scientist, ran some experiments that showed scary stories cause people to overrate minuscule risks. In one experiment, students indicated they would pay four times more to avoid a one-in-a-million risk after being told an emotional story about the horrors of cancer. The authors suggest that overreaction to the tiny risks posed by nuclear waste, terrorism, the chemical Alar, the toxic waste at Love Canal, anthrax in the mail, and even sharks have produced regulations whose costs far exceed their benefits.
Although Sunstein and Zeckhauser offer an extensive list of failures to rein in regulations, their solution is that wise bureaucrats wielding cost-benefit analyses “should provide a check on regulations that deviate substantially from objective evidence.” Sunstein is now serving as President Obama’s chief regulatory overseer, which raises the question: How’s that working out for you?
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
قبلة الوداع|8.17.11 @ 10:03PM|#
ThaNk U