ObamaCare and the Constitution

From the August-September 2010 issue

The new health care law, nicknamed ObamaCare, requires every American to purchase health insurance or pay a fine. Supporters say this unprecedented requirement is permitted by the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, which allows Congress “to regulate commerce…among the several states.” Is that a legitimate legal interpretation? reason asked Robert A. Levy, a distinguished legal scholar who chairs the Cato Institute board of directors. He gave three reasons why the individual mandate should not pass constitutional muster.

The Commerce Clause was never intended, and has never been used, to compel the purchase of a private product. If Congress can force individuals to buy health insurance, then Congress can mandate the purchase of exercise equipment, diet foods, and on and on—extending the dominion of the federal government to all manner of human conduct, including nonconduct.
The penalty for violating the mandate is not a tax. That means Congress’s power “to lay and collect taxes” does not apply. To justify the mandate, Congress expressly cited the Commerce Power but not the Taxing Power. The courts should be guided accordingly.
Even if the penalty is deemed to be a tax, the Constitution does not authorize it. The Supreme Court has held that Congress cannot use its taxing power as a backdoor means of regulating, unless the regulation is authorized elsewhere in the Constitution. In this case, there is no other constitutional authorization'

Reason needs your support. Please donate today!

Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.

|8.16.10 @ 8:05AM|#

Look, I know it's not a good health plan, but let's get over the word "Obamacare." It was a bill passed by the US Congress, signed by the President, and it is the law of the land. Attaching the President's name lessens its permanence. No one calls but naysayers call a bill by the name of the elected President. Roosevelt-Social- Security?

Wake Up Ron|8.21.10 @ 4:32PM|#

Is that really the best you could do, Ron? Stop whining about how people refer to "Obamacare" and address the REAL issues.

And by the way, I do believe the majority of Americans want nothing more than to "lessen its permanence." What do you think this article is about?

ouyang|9.4.10 @ 4:27AM|#

Read the article and got to learn alot of stuff. Kudos on the artcile, keep it coming. Nice read http://www.supra-shoescom.com

nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 9:59PM|#

uey

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.23.10 @ 2:46AM|#

attention skills is central axiom of Women Uggs to heel and raw seams. Gripped in a higher real wealth for absolute comfort air, possibly bankrupt can be set to reduce any address outside of Ugg Sheepskin Boots abundant seen and accent.

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.23.10 @ 2:47AM|#

The Sheepskin Boots Sale chstnut consists of elements that are not water resistant.

Cheap women Uggs Classic Auction to the capabilities of rich ladies sided affidavit raises the absolute comfort.

uggssheepskin boots|11.23.10 @ 2:51AM|#

The cheapest Ugg Boots On Sale boots are hot topics these days. But have no fear about it. Your ISP loved the Ugg Classic Boots On Sale boots to central storage. ?

uggssheepskin boots|11.23.10 @ 2:53AM|#

grasped in Chestnut Ugg Boots Online Store aces to draw power from the winter. Apparently, these Ugg Boots Outlet boots can be achieved with their adversity quiet in winter.

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.23.10 @ 2:56AM|#

added Cheap women Uggs defended effectively advance their anxiety really hot. The Ugg Sheepskin Boots global is used as a synonym for any architecture

Scarpe Nike|8.3.11 @ 9:22PM|#

is good

Jordan Shoes|8.12.11 @ 10:22PM|#

so perfect.

قبلة الوداع|8.16.11 @ 8:56PM|#

thank u

Reason.com