Are false abuse charges a common tactic in child custody
battles?
Cathy Young from the December 2006 issue
p class="COlargetext c3">
Child custody
span class=
"c2">disputes are some of the bloodiest battlefields in the gender
wars—battlefields upon which allegations of spousal and child abuse
are widely regarded as a nuclear weapon. But there are two opposite
views of this problem. Fathers’ advocates claim abuse allegations
are routinely used to deny divorced fathers contact with their
children and to poison children’s minds against their fathers, in
what the activists and some psychologists call “parental alienation
syndrome.” Feminists argue that well-founded accusations of abuse
are often dismissed and even turned against the accusing
mothers.
o:p>
/o:p>
/span>
/p>
p>
span class="c2">The explosive claim that batterers and
molesters frequently gain sole custody of their children while
protective mothers are branded as liars has gotten a lot of media
attention in the last year. In the fall of 2005, PBS broadcast the
documentary
Breaking the Silence: The Children’s Stories
,
which profiled several children placed in the custody of allegedly
abusive fathers and presented these cases as representative of the
system’s failure. After an outcry from fathers’ groups, PBS
commissioned a review but eventually declared that the program met
the network’s standards of fairness and research. (Corporation for
Public Broadcasting ombudsman Ken Bode, by contrast, found the film
“so totally unbalanced as to fall outside the boundaries of PBS
editorial standards.”) A year later,
Newsweek
weighed in
with a story in its September 25, 2006, issue, “Fighting Over the
Kids,” which asserted that many battered mothers were losing
custody of their children after being slapped with the “parental
alienation” label.
o:p>
/o:p>
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245