Julian Sanchez from the May 2005 issue
If Roe v. Wade were reversed tomorrow, what would America look like? As the Center for Reproductive Rights noted in a September 2004 report, many states still have laws on the books that could reinstate abortion restrictions immediately upon a reversal of Roe. Others would be quick to pass new ones.
But the practical effect on women might be less dramatic than it first appears. A 2000 study found that, for better or worse, 87 percent of U.S. counties--and the vast majority of nonmetropolitan counties--lack even a single abortion provider. For about a third of reproductive-age women, ending an unwanted pregnancy already requires a long trip.
Reversing Roe could also have counterintuitive political effects. As Benjamin Wittes noted recently in The Atlantic, Republicans now enjoy the best of both worlds: They can use the abortion issue to mobilize a hard-core pro-life base while not actually being obliged to enact the politically unpopular restrictions those groups would demand. Without the cover provided by Roe, many red governors of blue states might find themselves nostalgic for the old days.
Chart: Projected Status of Abortion Rights Absent Roe (by State) (not available online)
Source: Center for Reproductive Rights
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.8.10 @ 12:24AM|#
nxtrh