Letters

A Swift Boat Kick in the Teeth

I can find only one place in Matt Welch's "A Swift Boat Kick in the Teeth" (November) where Welch actually addresses something he found to be untrue in the swift boat vets' claims: "For instance, in the original commercial, military doctor Van O'Dell said, 'John Kerry lied to get his Bronze Star....I know, I was there, I saw what happened.' In fact he wasn't there, neither when Kerry was wounded nor when he gave his account of the incident."

If Welch is such a great chaff separator, what are his sources for this statement? Did Van O'Dell ever change his claim? Welch has a Maureen Dowdish ellipsis in there. What did he cut out from what Van O'Dell said?

Welch never addresses the most damning claim of the swift boat vets, that Kerry behaved traitorously after returning from Vietnam. His statements on the record to Congress are an excellent illustration of a drunken (on the possibility of power) sailor in a bar reporting something he has "heard," not what he has witnessed. That these statements were used by North Vietnamese on our POWs is a matter of record as well.

Luke Granfield
Iowa City, IA

Matt Welch replies: Luke Granfield is correct, and I am in error. Van O'Dell was there; I mixed him up with swift boater Louis Leston, who was not. I regret the foul-up.

Mandatory Health Insurance Now!

Ronald Bailey advocates "Mandatory Health Insurance Now!" (November). So did some Republicans in Congress during the height of the Billarycare proposal 10 years ago, and so has The Economist. Here's why they're all wrong.

Bailey likens a mandate that adults buy health insurance to requirements for car and home insurance. This is a bad analogy. If you don't drive or own a car, you don't have to buy auto insurance. If you aren't actually paying a mortgage, you don't have to buy home insurance.

Bailey is also guilty of bad math. He claims policies covering catastrophic expenses "typically" cost less than $300 per month for a family of four. A typical figure for just a married couple (no children, both in excellent health) is actually over $400 a month. The Richmond Times-Dispatch just mentioned the case of one couple who were quoted $1,700 per month for full coverage by Anthem, the health insurer of last resort in Virginia. Oh, and good luck getting coverage at any price if you have any pre-existing conditions or a child with medical problems. Don't forget the market: Impose a mandate, and watch premiums skyrocket as insurers take advantage.

Bailey mentions couples with income of more than $50,000 a year who "choose" to go without health insurance. Someone working for a company making that amount typically would have employer-provided insurance. A little checking would reveal that many of these people are self-employed, trying to run small businesses, or working several part-time jobs to make that amount, and that this is not what they necessarily make every year. Fifty grand is not a lot of income any more: In many areas of the country it is not enough to qualify for a home mortgage, for example. Impose a mandate, and see a lot of struggling small businesses close.

Realistically speaking, what would Bailey propose doing with those who lose their jobs and are unable to pay for this mandated health insurance? Throw them in jail? Fine them? If they can't afford insurance, how will they afford a fine? Mandating health insurance in response to the ongoing crisis in medical care is like solving the problem of affordable housing by mandating that everyone buy a house. Such a mandate is unworkable, unconstitutional, and unlibertarian.

Edwin Krampitz Jr.
Drewryville, VA

The Ronald Bailey article is interesting, but there seem to be two striking flaws in the proposal. Group health insurance in large companies protects the individual with costly conditions by including him with the less costly. As an individual, he will be dropped or his rates will soar.

As for a large deductible making people smart consumers, this only applies to people who are already putting the least strain on the system. People with big medical costs know that they are going to fulfill the deductible at the start of the year, so they have no incentive to shop around. Truth is, the healthy will not give much thought to cost until they get a nasty health surprise, and that's not the time to shop.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement