Federal Court: Flipping the Bird to the Cops is Protected Speech
A police officer can't pull you over and arrest you just because you gave him the finger, a federal appeals court declared Thursday.
In a 14-page opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that the "ancient gesture of insult is not the basis for a reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or impending criminal activity."
John Swartz and his wife Judy Mayton-Swartz had sued two police officers who arrested Swartz in May 2006 after he flipped off an officer who was using a radar device at an intersection in St. Johnsville, N.Y. Swartz was later charged with a violation of New York's disorderly conduct statute, but the charges were dismissed on speedy trial grounds.
Source: HuffPo. Read full article. (link)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
-
I GOT YOU HALF A PEACE SIGN, PIGGY BABY!
YOU CAN PUT YOUR KRISPY KREME DONUTS RIGHT HERE!
YEAH!
What's the matter guys, is this a Dunkin Donut day?
(Sound of a breaking finger.) -
That ruling should be tattooed on the pig's forehead.
-
I believe that it was already protected speech. This decision is more about whether the officer's actions were reasonable even if mistaken.
-
ancient gesture of insult is not the basis for a reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or impending criminal activity."