Prop 21: Why Californians don't need a car tax to save their state parks
Once considered the best in the nation, California's state parks
are falling apart due to chronic underfunding and mismanagement.
The park system has a backlog of $1 billion in deferred maintenance
and, last year, 150 of California's parks closed part-time or
suffered service reductions.
What's the solution? Supporters of Prop 21 believe that the answer
lies in a new car tax. If Prop 21 passes in November, California
drivers will have to pony up an additional 18 bucks when they
register their cars. In exchange, California drivers will be able
to use state parks during the day without paying an entrance
fee.
Does it make sense to tax drivers to subsidize park users? What's
the alternative?
We went to Sedona, Arizona and met with Warren Meyer of Recreation
Resource Management. As Meyer explained, California doesn't need a
car tax to save its parks. Instead, California should contract with
private park management companies that can manage parks more
efficiently than public agencies while actually paying rent to the
government for the right to do so.
Approximately 7.5 minutes. Produced by Paul Feine and Alex
Manning.
Scroll down for HD, iPod and audio versions of this video and
subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel to receive automatic
notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Blogger
StumbleUpon
Digg
Delicious
Reddit
Google