Ahmet Ertegun, RIP
Jesse Walker | December 15, 2006, 10:59am
A key figure in twentieth-century music has
died:
Ahmet Ertegun, the music magnate who founded Atlantic Records and shaped the careers of John Coltrane, Ray Charles, the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin and many others, died today in Manhattan. He was 83.
A spokesman for Atlantic Records said the death was the result of a brain injury suffered when Mr. Ertegun fell backstage at the Beacon Theater in Manhattan on Oct. 29 as the Rolling Stones prepared to play a concert to mark former President Bill Clinton's 60th birthday.
I better get this out of the way quickly:
Look! Another Clinton-linked death! OK, here's my serious reaction: Ertegun was more famous than most people on the business side of pop music, in part because he was so memorably played in
Ray by Curtis "Booger" Armstrong. But his significance is a lot larger than that.
Some people have a romantic notion that commerce and art are always at loggerheads and that the role of the music industry is to suck all the soul out of its product. And there's enough corruption, mediocrity, and protectionism in the business to give that notion some staying power. But there are also businessmen who really care about the music they sell, who go out of their way to nurture their artists' talents. There's a reason why music fans speak reverently not just of their favorite performers, producers, and writers, but of the enterprises that allowed them to flourish, from FAME Studios in Muscle Shoals, Alabama, to Sun Records in Memphis, Tennessee.
Atlantic grew to be a lot bigger than Sun, but it was no less vibrant. If I was forced to choose between a world without Atlantic's soul catalog and a world without Motown, I'd throw Berry Gordy overboard in a heartbeat -- and I
like Motown.
Ertegun, who was a producer and songwriter as well as an executive, got his start as a record collector, not a record magnate. Everything I've read about him indicates that he was a genuine music fan; that he was interested not just in getting rich by giving the public what it wanted but in doing good by giving the public what it didn't realize it would like. Indeed, like any canny entrepreneur who loves what he does, he saw those two interests as one and the same. He
liked jazz, rock, blues, and soul, and because of that, he helped give the rest of us a chance to like the music too.
And when he
didn't like it, he might let someone else make the dough. Here's my favorite Ertegun
story, from the critic Dave Marsh:
[Jackson Browne's] musical rewards are not always obvious -- Ahmet Ertegun of Atlantic Records famously couldn't hear it at all, even when David Geffen implored him to sign Browne because "there was a fortune to be made." "You start a label," Ahmet said, "you make the fortune." So Geffen started Asylum Records, and he not only made a fortune, his label, with Browne and the Eagles, became the center of California rock in the Seventies.
To sign Ray Charles, and to refuse to sign Jackson Browne -- Ahmet Ertegun was a man with taste.
James Anderson Merritt | December 15, 2006, 1:47pm | #
I also like Jackson Browne and Ray Charles.
For every Ahmet Ertegun who gave a damn and was an admiring, perfectionist consumer of his own product, there are a thousand record company execs and minions who earn the industry its well-deserved, general reputation for greedy, parasitic, cutthroat, tone-deaf scumminess. As a commercial radio DJ in the 1970s and '80s, I encountered industry denizens of the latter type routinely, and can attest to it all. Ertegun may have been a diamond in all that rough (and by "rough," I mean manure), but even his considerable contribution was not nearly enough to redeem the industry in the eyes of anyone who wants artists to get their due and fans to get true value for money. Will we see his like again? Given the current state of the music industry, CAN we ever see his like again?
I completely agree about the technical quality of Atlantic recordings and pressings. The people running the studio and disc manufacturing operations were true pros. I enjoy listening to old Atlantic hits, in part, for their excellent production values.
Some people are saying that Sonny and Cher and the Bee Gees were with Atlantic (and in that case, some have asked, why couldn't Ertegun embrace Jackson Browne and the Eagles, too?). It is important, however, to note that those acts weren't orginally signed to Atlantic, but to ATCO, which was the label that Atlantic used for its non-blues, non-soul, non-jazz acts, as well as several of its "B-list" and novelty artists, much as NBC Universal now spins off "genre" TV series to USA network or the SciFi Channel. That said, I really don't understand why the acts Ertegun rejected at Atlantic couldn't have been accommodated via ATCO. Maybe he was more into letting Geffen show his own guts and get his own glory. It all worked out in the end, as all the Atlantic "rejects" nevertheless ended up under the same corporate umbrella as Atlantic. Such are the ironies of the music biz.
James Anderson Merritt | December 15, 2006, 2:57pm | #
Jesse Walker | December 15, 2006, 2:05pm | #
And yes, the music business is sleazy as hell. But even if every major were utterly beyond hope, I could reel off plenty of indie labels run by businesspeople who clearly love music and want their artists to develop their talents. The trouble isn't commerce; it's a particular set of commercial (and legal) institutions.
=============================================
You could say much the same thing about politics in this country: the trouble isn't politics; it's the Democrat and Republican oligarchy, and the legal institutions that said oligarchy has established to protect itself from any effective competition. But right there, you've accounted for the lion's share of American politics. The Libertarian Party could, for example, win thousands or even tens-of-thousands of local, "non-partisan" offices across the country, and still be counted as an also-ran, while the Demos and GOP continued to stick their noses into people's everyday lives and vacuum out their wallets on a regular basis.
Back to the music industry, my hat is off to all the indies: may they and their artists enjoy the journey because, statistically speaking, that will be the bulk of their reward.
Maybe, in Ertegun's honor and memory, we should identify the laws that Libertarians would need to repeal (or, I'd wager, the far smaller set of laws that Libertarians would need to enact) in order to improve the music industry situation on behalf of the artists, craftsmen, and consumers...?