July 27, 2010
Should the Supreme Court practice judicial restraint?
In his cover story from the July issue of Reason, Associate Editor Damon W. Root discussed how the debate over judicial activism is dividing the conservative legal movement. Root sat down with Reason.tv Editor in Chief Nick Gillespie to discuss libertarian and conservative legal theories, judicial activism, Elena Kagan's nomination, and more. Approximately 10 minutes. Shot by Meredith Bragg, Josh Swain and Dan Hayes. Edited by Hayes.
Below see a 50-minute debate between Root, Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center, and Federalist Society President Eugene B. Meyer. The debate took place at Reason headquarters in Washington D.C on June 30th, 2010.
Scroll down for downloadable iPod, HD, and audio versions of this and all our videos, and subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new material goes live.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Jeffersonian|7.28.10 @ 12:00AM|#
"Activism" is when the SCOTUS deviates from statutes as written (when consitutional) or from the Constitution and Amendments as understood when written. It has nothing to do with precedent or deference.
WTF|7.28.10 @ 11:21AM|#
Pretty much, yeah. The Slaughterhouse majority were pretty activist judges.
AT|7.28.10 @ 5:43AM|#
The camera moves!