Jesse Walker | January 31, 2009
Soccer, rugby, and American football
have a common ancestor: a medieval free-for-all that historians
call "mob
football." According to the ever-reliable Wikipedia, the game
was notable for "having an unlimited number of players and fairly
vague rules. By some accounts, any means could be used to move the
ball to a goal, as long as it did not lead to manslaughter or
murder." With admirable efficiency, players combined the soccer
match and the soccer riot in a single activity.
So as you sink into the couch tomorrow to watch a game, some ads, and a lame halftime show, spare a thought for the days when sports didn't mean spectatorship, and villagers had to either participate or hide:
It was explicitly violent and played between villages, at the time of celebration and festivity. In fact, it was so violent that people living nearby would barricade their windows during matches.
That quote comes from expertfootball.com, which also informs us that the authorities often attempted to suppress the sport:
On April 13, 1314 King Edward II issued one of the first recorded prohibitions, because of the impact that "this hustling over large balls" had on the merchant life. Edward III also tried to stop "futeball" in 1349, followed by Richard II, Henry IV, Henry VI and James III. The game was frowned upon by the bourgeoisie due to its unchristian [sic] nature and its lack of regulations.
By the 17th century, Carew of Cornwall attempted to introduce some sense in his Survey of Cornwall by adding the prohibition of charging players below the girdle and by disallowing the forward pass. These implementations, however, were not widely used and violence continued to [be] relished.
Fight the power. Pass the ball.
Update: The game is still played annually in Ashbourne, England. Here's some footage:
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
If soccer and football are really coming from the same roots,
what about liberal and libertarian?
http://bostonreview.net/BRwebonly/cohen2.php
In his book Political Liberalism, John Rawls offers a general description of a liberal political outlook. He intends the description to cover views ranging from the classical liberalism of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, arguably in the tradition of Locke and Adam Smith, to the more egalitarian liberalism of his own Theory of Justice. Rawls writes, "the content of a liberal political conception of justice is given by three main features:
1. a specification of basic rights, liberties and opportunities (of a kind familiar from constitutional democratic regimes);
2. an assignment of special priority to those rights, liberties and opportunities, especially with respect of claims of the general good and perfectionist values; and
3. measures assuring to all citizens adequate all-purpose means to make effective use of their liberties and opportunities.
These [three] elements can be understood in different ways, so that there are many variant liberalisms."
Aren't these just the typically vacuous abstractions that only a philosopher could love? No. Quite to the contrary, Rawls here identifies the common ground shared by classical and egalitarian liberals. And, I think, the common ground occupied by the participants in this discussion.
The abstract description of shared ground is located at the level of principle, not policy, but it is not vacuous at all, and in two important ways....
Also check out the french inter-village/parish game, La Soule
which spread from the Norse settled areas, and may have developed
from the viking game, Knattleikr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Soule
Bonus rugby/anti-liberal factoid: Germany used to be pretty good at
rugby union, and actually beat France twice in the interwar period.
It was however suppressed by the Nazis.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/21082007/3/place-rugby-sports-crazy-germany.html
No place for rugby in sports-crazy Germany
Tue 21 Aug, 07:49 AM
BERLIN (AFP) - In sports-mad Germany, next month's Rugby World Cup will pass without barely a mention, despite the fact that the sport was once popular here until it was decimated by World War II.
There are 99 rugby clubs and about 10,000 die-hard players in Germany, but football dwarfs it in every way.
"People forget, however, that the first rugby club in Germany was founded in 1872 and the German Rugby Federation was set up in 1900," said Claus-Peter Bach, the federation's current president.
"Germany was even Olympic silver medallist in rugby in 1900 and beat France twice in the 1930s. But that all belongs to a different era."
While the 'Mannschaft' is a world power in football, its poor relation in rugby is ranked just 14th in Europe and plays against opponents such as Moldova, Ukraine and Belgium.
"The Nazis are responsible for the demise. Most of the players were killed in World War II and for a long time, too little was done to bring the level back up," Bach said.
The Nazis barely tolerated rugby. "It was too English a sport for the regime," Bach said.
As a result it lost its financial support and much of the popularity it had gained in the western and northern cities of Heidelberg, Hanover and Frankfurt.
Rugby has found a small but dedicated following today in several university cities, but the level of play is decidedly low.
Pierre Broncan, who coaches French second division club Auch, played for the German national side from 2001 to 2005 after qualifying by virtue of his German mother.
"At that time, the German federation wanted to improve its chances on the international scene and so was going around asking French and South African with German ancestry to play," he said.
Broncan said a handful of training camps and matches, including a mass brawl during one of his first matches for Germany in Ukraine, revealed to him how low standards had fallen.
"The problem is the training of teachers and club coaches. It means that a lot of youngsters give up the sport," Broncan said.
Claus-Peter Bach recognises the problems, but insisted the federation was looking to the future with hope.
"We need better coaches and we are expecting a lot from seminars that we are intending to organise with the French and the Welsh with the help of the International Rugby Board."
While German players occasionally break through into French or English clubs, such as Robert Mohr at La Rochelle or Sacha Fischer at Perigueux, most stay at home and thus miss out on the chance of improving their skills and knowledge.
"The problem is that they have no reason to go abroad in the way that Georgians and Romanians do. There is enough money in Germany," Broncan said.
Deprived of the media exposure dominated by football and handball, which is riding a wave of popularity since Germany won the world championship this year, rugby looks set to continue its decline.
"Qualification for the 2015 World Cup is not out of the question," Bach insists.
Pierre Broncan is not so sure. "It will be hard, very hard. It was hard enough in 1987 in the first World Cup, but with the professionalism of the game now...
"There's some top talent and a passion which rivals that of the southwest of France. But there are so many holes."
I've seen Braveheart. I don't think King Edward II would have much of a problem with men "hustling over large balls."
As another weekend passes without a weekend political thread, I
am once again forced to go off topic on a post. Because politics
doesn't stop while Reason writers enjoy the Super Bowl
weekend.
An administration official said Mr. Daschle's failure to pay the taxes was "a stupid mistake." But, the official said, Mr. Daschle should not be penalized because he had discovered the tax liability himself, paid up and brought it to the committee's attention.
The committee report said, "Senator Daschle filed the amended returns voluntarily after Barack Obama announced his intention to nominate the senator to be the secretary of health and human services." [italics added by a cynic]
Change we can believe in!
It was explicitly violent and played between villages, at
the time of celebration and festivity.
Sounds like the origins of lacrosse.
When "tribalism" meant something.
More "stupid mistakes".
If Daschle, and our new Secretary of the Treasury (and head of the
Internal Revenue Service) are "too stupid" to pay their taxes, why
aren't they "too stupid" to be appointed to high government
offices?
Any guesses?
"The claim also exists that it was first played with the severed
head of a Danish ruler of England who had been deposed."
I now have far more respect for the origins of football. Let us get
football back to its roots!
forgive my ignorance, but i thought the game described in the article was basically the same thing as modern rugby.
On April 13, 1314 King Edward II issued one of the first recorded prohibitions, because of the impact that "this hustling over large balls" had on the merchant life
The start of a love-hate relationship that haunts the Republican
Party to this very day.
also, obligatory
J sub D,
Wait...wait...wait...nope.
Still don't give a shit about people screwing up their taxes, then
making back payments.
Sorry. Maybe the next one...but probably not.
joe,
Why do you need others to do your wedgie work for you?
Football...boring...so boring...
Who is betting on Penn for tonight?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2009/01/vegas-odds-on-p.html
so he can operate the video camera Neu, duh.
I don't see BJ winning, but since it's my two of current favorites
going up against each other, hopefully it'll live up to the
hype.
We could have Dennis Hallman be the guest judge, having three of
Hughes's conquerers present :)
forgive my ignorance, but i thought the game described in
the article was basically the same thing as modern
rugby.
It begat rugby, which begat soccer and American football.
I assume Jesse Walker meant that WP is "ever-reliable" in the
sarcastic sense. If so, one wonders why he would then give WP a
good link, one that will increase the chance that the linked page
will rank for "mob football".
I note, for instance, that en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason_Magazine
has a nofollow tag on the link to this site, meaning that Walker is
giving them a good link and they aren't returning the favor.
I could probably spend the next year pointing out problems with WP,
but for a quick example here's my discussion of their Valerie
Jarrett entry.
"Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in grade
school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer". Sort of like tag,
with a football, and almost no rules. A good game for generally
aggressive young males to play during limited time breaks. The more
players, the better, and tackling/dog piles were encouraged.
I remember once seeing a film in school about this crazy
football-like game in the UK called rugby, which energized all us
Smear the queer playing boys. After trying it a few times, we
reverted back to smear the queer, as rugby still had too many
rules.
'On April 13, 1314 King Edward II issued one of the first
recorded prohibitions, Edward III also tried to stop "futeball" in
1349, followed by Richard II, Henry IV, Henry VI and James
III'
This is strange - if this is meant to be a list of *English* kings,
who is James III? Are we Jacobites here? Did
an exiled Jacobite king issue a prohibition a football? If so, no
wonder his people didn't invite him back!
Lonewacko your jihad against wikipedia is even more quixotic than your one against Mexico. And both are beat by your fatwa against Tim Berners-Lee in your quest for Hiyakawan purity in object oriented programing.
Since James III inspired two Jacobite revolts in Scotland, one of which he went to in person, I'm guessing he at least never issued a ban on *golf.* Or on haggis, either.
Max: The game wasn't limited to England. Or even the British Isles. One of the pictures in the post is from Russia.
...though considering the number of typos on that page, the author might have meant James II.
Jesse,
If it was James II who tried to ban football, maybe we need to
re-examine the causes of King Jamess' overthrow in 1688.
And both are beat by your fatwa against Tim Berners-Lee in
your quest for Hiyakawan purity in object oriented
programing
Whaaaa???
"Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in grade
school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer".
Oh shit I remember that. Fun.
The *other* kings on the list were kings of England. Of what other kingdom was James III king? There was a James III of Scotland, a James III of Cyprus . . . anyone else?
Whaaaa???
If it helps at all, I think he meant "Hayakawan", not
"Hiyakawan".
Smear the queer aka Bull Rush in NZ. The great sorrow of the feminist ascension in NZ was marked by attempts to ban it at schools. Pockets of resistance developed and in time flourished though.
"Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in grade school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer".
I always wondered if "smear the queer" was just a local name for it
or was the accepted name nationally. Now I know.
A pointless game.
If it helps at all, I think he meant "Hayakawan", not
"Hiyakawan".
No, I really, really want to hear LoneMoron's thoughts on OOP.
Like, a lot. What, does he have a problem with polymorphism and
inheritance?
Calvinball is much cooler (if nothing else, it prepares you for a career in public service)...
It begat rugby, which begat soccer and American football.
The way I heard it is that rugby and soccer developed independently
at about the same time. And largely due to the formalizing of rules
for a new phenomenon in 19th century England, regularly scheduled
spectator sporting events organized for the benefit (and
distraction) of the new industrial workers.
I'm pretty sure you're correct that American football (and the
Canadian version) developed from rugby though. And while rugby
football did originate in the public schools, particularly Rugby
School, the creation story is largely a myth.
There are two philosophies in the versions of football. One says
that football is game where the ball is advanced by the
feet the other says football is a game played on
foot. Soccer comes from the former, rugby, and hence American
and Canadian football come from the latter.
And I guess games like Australian Rules and Gaelic Football come
about by combining both.
Oh and whereas in America "football" refers to the American game
and in Europe and the UK it refers to soccer, there are exceptions.
In Wales parts of the north of England "football" means Rugby and
Soccer is never referred to except as a game that poofters
play.
And, of course in Australia "football" means Australian rules
except in New South Wales and parts of Queensland where the word
means Rugby League.
Actually, Australian Rules Football has the oldest codified rules of any of the standard forms, including "soccer," the two forms of Rugby, and Gridiron.
It was set in the 1850's as a winter condition-maintenance game for cricketers.
And its rulebook is the size of a playing card and just under 1 cm thick.
No, I really, really want to hear LoneMoron's thoughts on
OOP. Like, a lot. What, does he have a problem with polymorphism
and inheritance?
In short he hates Mr Lee (possbily even more than the more well
known bete noirs) for inventing html. Since it's not object
oriented. But is nonetheless the standard. He thinks (I think) that
OOP is the Fukuyaman (verified spelling on google) pinnacle of
computer science, the be all and end all. So Mr Lee should be
thrown into the same circle of the Inferno as Karl Marx and Maurice
Starr.
(yes it was hayakawa before. And I may using terms I'm not entirely
familiar with in a slipshod or even entirely incorrect manner)
VM,
I think Penn has a better shot at forcing the stoppage.
But if it goes to the judges, it seems unlikely that he would
dominate enough to get the points. He has too much of a size
advantage to overcome.
I actually think the more interesting fight will be Machida/Silva.
Machida will probably get it, but Silva is dangerous.
"With admirable efficiency, players combined the soccer match
and the soccer riot in a single activity."
That's just fucking beautiful. Not much has changed if you happen
to be in the vicinity of Millwall.
Would somebody please give Neu Mejican a wedgie?
This is one of those moments where, if INCIF had lips, I would kiss
it.
Join us. Don't be afraid.
"Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in
grade school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer".
We called it "Muckle the Man with the Football."
I think "muckle" was a contraction of "murder" and "tackle."
"Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in
grade school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer".
It was "smear the queer" for me in grade school, too. God it was
fun. Big huge dog piles. Remarkably, I don't remember too many
injuries. And if someone did get hurt, they wouldn't have been
pussy enough to admit it.
And if someone did get hurt, they wouldn't have been pussy
enough to admit it.
Holy shit. Around age 11 or 12, I remember getting tackled into a
big pile of wood next to the yard. I go limping and sniffling back
toward the house and my mom comes out and admonishes me to get back
in the game 'cause the other kids are taking their licks too. She
wasn't gonna let me sissy out. So I do, and later that night after
dinner while I'm still limping my dad wants to look at my leg.
Well, I can't roll the pant-leg up, so I drop pants and my right
lower leg is all swollen and black and blue. Mom almost faints. The
folks take me to the hospital for an x-ray, which was negative;
just an incredibly nasty bruise. My mom spent the rest of her life
known in the family for her Knute Rockne speech to me.
It's too bad we don't let kids be kids anymore. These days I'm sure
somebody would've sued someone.
Actually, they play this game annually at my alma mater, but
they call it "Spartan Madball." It's freshmen and seniors against
sophomores and juniors, and the game ends after an hour, or three
people go to the hospital. The rules are:
1. No shoes.
2. No weapons.
3. No cars.
I've only seen two people go to the hospital, so the game has
always gone a full hour. Broken toes and fingers are pretty common,
though. I was always too much of a weenie to play, until my senior
year. Brutal game.
We called it "Muckle the Man with the Football."
Damn, where did you go to school?
Here in Belmont, we simply called it "Kill the Carrier", which
along with a delightful game involving tennis balls and a brick
wall called "Suicide" was our primary past-time on the
playground.
Mob football" sounds a lot like what we used to play in
grade school, usually referred to as "Smear the queer".
Where we played it, it was called 'Maul Ball'. The goal of the game
was to grab the ball and run and avoid being tackled as long as
possible. Once you were tackled, you had to throw the ball up for
grabs. Some of the smaller kids would throw the ball up when it was
obvious they were about to get nailed. Sometimes I think we had
'end zones' that were safe for a few seconds if you reached them,
but then you had to immediately turn around and try to make another
run through the field of players.
The trouble with that clip is that it doesn't really give enough of a sense of how violent and how much fun it can be. There's also a version where the action is fought over a wooden barrel.
Sounds to me like a version of 43-Man Squamish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/43-Man_Squamish
Go Cards!
.. Hobbit
tarran,
Southeastern Mass. For all I know, the name was unique to my middle
school.
The great irony is that it was often played with a nerf ball.
Neu - sounded like quite the night of action!
Glad Clay G. won!
didja get to see any?
If the Cards were a stock, I'd be selling right now. Top of
the market.
Friggin' A. Pittsburgh's strengths match up real well against the
Cards' weaknesses. The Steelers are going to have to make a lot of
mistakes if Arizona is to win this.
I'm looking to see how the Cardinals' backfield - especially
Edgerrin James - does keeping Kurt Warner upright against
Blitzburgh.*
*Yeah, I know they don't really blitz a lot, but they send a lot of
strange rush packages, and when they do blitz, they do so very
effectively. Plus, I like to say "Blitzburgh."
VM,
I am not enough of a fan to actually pay to view.
I'll watch it when it is free...but sounds like GSP took advantage
of his advantages (he is the about biggest guy in his weight
class...)The Machida KO sounds like it was the fight of the night.
I think a Evans/Machida match up will be interesting.
The question now: Does GSP move up to take on The Spider?
along with a delightful game involving tennis balls and a
brick wall called "Suicide" was our primary past-time on the
playground.
Suicide was another staple. Just looked it up on wiki, and our
version was little different from the version described, being
basically handball with beatings allowed. Usually more fun and
chaotic with more players.
Also played a lot of pickle, on a baseball diamond with five bases,
pitcher's mount included. With fifteen or more players, it gets
pretty chaotic.
Still don't give a shit about people screwing up their
taxes, then making back payments.
But not making back payments that they knew they owed until it was
politically inconvenient not to do so?
I see that joe is setting the bar agreeably low for the Right
People.
Oh, RC's now a mind reader; he knows what Daschle and Geithner
were thinking when they filled out their taxes several years
ago.
Awesome!
I see that joe is setting the bar agreeably low for the Right
People. And when you can find anything I've written about tax
errors by Bushies that applies another standard, it might be
possible for you to make the case that I, rather than you, are
being a partisan hack.
But you won't, you see.
Dumbfuck partisan hack.
I screwed up my taxes a few years back. World o' hurt, I tell ya. (1) Don't presume you know what people are thinking when they do their taxes. (2) High profile people should hire people to double check. (3) Complete dumbasses who fancy themselves intellectuals would do well to pay somebody to double check also. Cross reference: Is the appropriate honorific Doctor Tax-Dumbass?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245