Reason.com
Calculating the Price of Everything
On Monday, I appeared at a Cato Institute book forum hosted by David Boaz and featuring George Mason University economist Russell Roberts, whose new novel is the entertaining and edifying The Price of Everything. We ended up talking a lot about bailouts, markets, and how to engage non-libertarians with ideas about freedom.
You can watch video of the conversation or listen to a podcast by going here.
Most Popular Stories
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Wisconsin: 65 Percent Believe Gov’t Workers Receive Better Retirement Benefits (5.29)
- Wisconsin: 69 Percent Favor 401(k)-Style Accounts for Government Workers (5.29)
- 17 Percent of Wisconsinites Favor Disbursing Retirement Benefits to Gov’t Workers Before Age 65 (5.29)
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Egosumabbas|12.3.08 @ 3:00PM|#
How do you engage non-libertarians on freedom?
If they're rationalists, use a self-contained philosophy that would appeal to them, such as Objectivism, Austrian Economics, or Agorism.
Even rabid Marxists can become libertarians this way, because Marxism is a rational philosophy (even if it works on faulty assumptions). It also works with Catholic intellectuals, as they will be familiar with philosophy (Aristotle, Plato). Philosophy majors would be receptive too, as well as math majors. Even if you disagree intially, they may come to agree with certain axioms and logical conclusions in time.
Your typical wingnut or moonbat though? Only utilitarian arguments will work with them, as they'll reject any philosophy as "ivory tower thinking", that doesn't achieve "practical results" and isn't "pragmatic". Utilitarian argumentation will not always work you'll find yourself wasting your breath in back-and-forth arguments that go on until 4AM, as both sides hurl poorly-thought and methodologically weak studies at each other.
ed|12.4.08 @ 9:17AM|#
All I know is that tuna cans have shrunk to 4.50 oz.
Sorry, Charlie, I'm switching to salmon.