Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
The Olympics Were Never "Only About the Athletes"
The Washington Post's Anne Applebaum
takes down a list of standard excuses for "going along to get
along" at the Beijing Olympics. Highlights:
"The Olympics are a force for good." Not always! The 1936 Olympics, held in Nazi Germany, were an astonishing propaganda coup for Hitler. It's true that the star performance of Jesse Owens, the black American track-and-field great, did shoot some holes in the Nazi theory of Aryan racial superiority. But Hitler still got what he wanted out of the Games. With the help of American newspapers such as the New York Times, which opined that the Games put Germany "back in the family of nations again," he convinced many Germans, and many foreigners, to accept Nazism as "normal."...
"A boycott doesn't solve anything." Well, doesn't it? Some boycotts do help solve some things. The boycott of South Africa by international competitions was probably the single most effective weapon the international community ever deployed against the apartheid state. ("They didn't mind about the business sanctions," a South African friend once told me, "but they minded -- they really, really minded -- about the cricket.") The boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics helped undermine Soviet propaganda about the invasion of Afghanistan and helped unify the Western world against it.
Her powerful kicker:
No one involved in the preparations for this year's Olympics really believes that this is "only about the athletes," or that the Beijing Games will be an innocent display of sporting prowess, or that they bear no relation to Chinese politics. I don't see why the rest of us should believe those things, either.
More on the upcoming Games here.
|3.26.08 @ 3:41PM|#
I like the idea of all of the athletes shaving their heads for the opening cerimonies. The ChiComs are the most arrogant bastards on earth. They are used to dealing with Western business people and Chinese Studies types who depend on the goodwill of the government to do their work and think that they can bully their way out of anything. I hope the athletes give them fits.
|3.26.08 @ 3:42PM|#
I agree it would be a better idea for some of the athletes to make political statements at the games rather than have a boycott which would allow them to win all the medals like the Soviets did in 1980.
|3.26.08 @ 3:46PM|#
Its worth pointing out the 1988 Seoul Olympics, which were attended by everybody but North Korea, did a lot to push South Korea away from a military dictatorship and into a stable, liberal democracy.
some guy|3.26.08 @ 3:46PM|#
Will there be hulking, hairy-chinned, Chinese she-male swimmers
like in the old days?
That would be so cool.
Episiarch|3.26.08 @ 3:48PM|#
They absolutely should make political statements at the games. What are the Chinese going to do about it? Their whole facade of being a pretty normal growing nation will be blown if they do the regular beatdown on an athlete from a foreign country. They'll just have to grin and bear it. Or they'll strike out reflexively and look like the thugs they are.
|3.26.08 @ 3:54PM|#
Putting aside the probability that the Olympics are the clinical trials for new undetectable performance enhancers, I would prefer they be run as sporting events. I would suppose that Jesse Owens opened a few minds domestically, too, and that had the US boycotted the 1936 games, it may have delayed the end of the eugenics movement or the start of the Jackie Robinson and civil rights era.
some guy|3.26.08 @ 3:54PM|#
The Chinese have never been "hulking"
Wait and see. The ghost of Mao will cream his Mao suit.
Regarding Athlete Protestors|3.26.08 @ 3:55PM|#
Why do people assume that the athletes give a rat's ass about politics? If I were performing in the games, with the prospect of glimmering prizes and worldwide celebrity, I doubt I'd endanger it all by protesting the Commies.
|3.26.08 @ 4:03PM|#
I'm not a big sports fan. Not hugely interested in athletic
competitions and such.
But the thought of a nation's government forbidding its athletes
from competing in the Olympics, lest it lend some sort of
legitimacy to our foes, makes me sick.
If Applebaum is supporting things like Carter's refusal to let
Americans compete in the Moscow Olympics, she is nothing but a
hateful, craven bitch.
alan|3.26.08 @ 4:04PM|#
I remember before the Korean games James Michener (whatever his merits as a novelist may have been he was a typical dope on political/social matters) worrying in an essay that his fellow Americans may embarrass him at the games with patriotic chanting and the like. The great irony was no one behaved more jingoistic at those games than the South Korean athletes.
|3.26.08 @ 4:05PM|#
If I were performing in the games, with the prospect of
glimmering prizes and worldwide celebrity,
Only a handful of athletes have a given chance of winning a given
event. Most are there to compete and/or be tourists and/or have
something to tell the grandchildren about and/or screw like crazy
in the athlete's village.
Of those handful that CAN win, only one WILL win. Of those few that
DO win, only a small percentage of them (e.g. Michael Phelps) can
then turn that into money and/or fame. Most winners (e.g. Nelson
Diebel) will win their event, be a media darling for 2-3 days, and
then never be heard from again.
alan|3.26.08 @ 4:06PM|#
But the thought of a nation's government forbidding its
athletes from competing in the Olympics, lest it lend some sort of
legitimacy to our foes, makes me sick.
I agree, and would not the natural Cosmotarian viewpoint of the
Olympics be inclined to view them as something of a barbaric
throwback to Nationalism?
.|3.26.08 @ 4:08PM|#
I hope there are mass protests at the same time. I would love it
if a million Chinese were to march into the various stadiums and
arenas on live television.
Do I think this will happen? No. But one can have hope.
|3.26.08 @ 4:09PM|#
sixstring,
I would suppose that Jesse Owens opened a few minds
domestically, too, and that had the US boycotted the 1936 games, it
may have delayed the end of the eugenics movement
The eugenics movement was already largely dead by the early 1930's
having been done in by the discovery of genes and a series of court
case waged by the Southern Baptist Convention. In any case, blacks
were off the radar when it came to eugenics.
Owen's victory proved a poke in the eye to Germany in the United
States but in Europe it had little impact. Many in Europe thought
black people to comprise a separate species of humans who were more
animal like and possessed animal like athleticism. William Shirer
related a story of one Nazi telling him that racing a black man was
like racing a panther.
Abdul|3.26.08 @ 4:09PM|#
What are the Chinese going to do about it?
If kung fu movies are anything to go by, they will send the army
one man at a time to attack the hero, who will use his superior
monkey style to strike a blow for democratic values.
|3.26.08 @ 4:16PM|#
Thanks Shannon. I had thought things were on the decline but the
"end" was closer to mid-forties.
The great irony was no one behaved more jingoistic at those
games than the South Korean athletes.
...with the possible exception of the boxing judges.
|3.26.08 @ 4:18PM|#
But Hitler still got what he wanted out of the Games. With
the help of American newspapers such as the New York Times, which
opined that the Games put Germany "back in the family of nations
again," he convinced many Germans, and many foreigners, to accept
Nazism as "normal."
And so I ask you - why the hell did we give up on the Germans?
Those damn politicians in Washington chalked them up on our side
and the wars ever since have been a national disgrace. Hell, look
at history. The two best wars this country has fought were against
the Jerries. Now I say, get the Krauts on the other side of the
fence where they belong, and let's get back to the kind of enemy
worth killing and the kind of war this whole country can
support.
|3.26.08 @ 4:21PM|#
If kung fu movies are anything to go by, they will send the
army one man at a time to attack the hero, who will use his
superior monkey style to strike a blow for democratic
values.
You forgot that each attacker at a time will yell scream/yell just
as he starts his attack...to let the hero know he is coming in
case, you know, the hero had his back turned or something.
Philster|3.26.08 @ 4:22PM|#
It's true that most athletes dont care. But I hope at least one gold medalist says something about China's human rights record. Preferably on the podium.
|3.26.08 @ 4:23PM|#
I agree, and would not the natural Cosmotarian viewpoint of
the Olympics be inclined to view them as something of a barbaric
throwback to Nationalism?
I don't know about barbaric, but the whole thing is wrapped in
Jingoism, with the audience expected to root for their heroes
against a field of foreign villains and the notion that an athlete
wins a medal for his country, rather than himself.
|3.26.08 @ 4:24PM|#
But the thought of a nation's government forbidding its
athletes from competing in the Olympics, lest it lend some sort of
legitimacy to our foes, makes me sick
What if the government told athletes they were free to go to China
on their own dime but they can't claim to represent the US, use the
USA logo or fly the flag? Why can't the US have the same rights as
a corporation? Granted this is purely hypothetical, there is
absolutely no chance this will happen. We will kow-tow to the
Chinese, and we will smile while we do it.
I'm also surprised to see rage here about the 1980 boycott. I
didn't think Reason, of all places, had so many pro-USSR
sympathizers. The 1980 boycott was one of the bright spots of the
Carter presidency. For one thing it embarrassed the Soviets deeply,
far more deeply than most people realize, and really did begin to
delegitimize the whole Afghan venture in the eyes of many Soviet
citizens - or at the very least got them to think about it. Second,
it embarrassed the IOC, an aging collection of fascists almost as
obnoxious as the Politburo.
|3.26.08 @ 4:26PM|#
Anne Applebaum is a fatuous idiot. The fact that she was awarded
a Pulitzer only cheapens the Pulitzer, rather than vindicates
Applebaum.
Anne (in)famously stated "there is no air(*) on Mars" in a long,
techno-illiterate screed against manned spaceflight. Not just
against government funded manned spaceflight, but against the whole
concept.
(*) Technically, she was right, since only Earth has "air." Mars
has a significant atmosphere which although unbreathable would make
colonization there easier than Earth's Moon, but the rest of her
article made it clear that she seriously didn't (or couldn't)
understand, the difference between "air" and "atmosphere."
|3.26.08 @ 4:29PM|#
It's a pretty big stretch to equate thinking that the 1980 boycott was a meaningless gesture that served only the cheat the athletes out of what they'd been training their whole lives for with being pro-Soviet.
Abdul|3.26.08 @ 4:32PM|#
Just to play devil's advocate, one reason not to make a
statement at the games is the fear of retributive protests when we
host the Games again. Plenty of European countries have resisted
the urge to complain about their pet gripes (like the US's death
penalty or Mumia Abu Jamal) while they collected medals in sports
that America doesn't care about. In the post-Bush era, I can see
plenty of athletes bringing up Abu Grahib or global warming. Who
wants that?
I'm not comparing the US record on human rights to China, but we
know lots of other countries like to pretend that there is some
equivalency.
|3.26.08 @ 4:42PM|#
I'm also surprised to see rage here about the 1980 boycott. I didn't think Reason, of all places, had so many pro-USSR sympathizers.
You're right, because I think athletes should be able to compete
anywhere in the world, I'm quite obviously a Communist
sympathizer.
BakedPenguin|3.26.08 @ 4:46PM|#
"They didn't mind about the business sanctions," a South African friend once told me, "but they minded -- they really, really minded -- about the cricket."
Aussie industrialist Kerry Packer's rebel cricket tours of
international superstars gave the South Africans top level cricket,
and it also gave the apartheid government some propaganda. "See?
The entire world isn't against us."
I don't agree that the US should force its athletes to stay home,
but a voluntary boycott would be a good thing to see. Failing that,
someone whipping out a "Free Tibet" or a picture of Tienanmen tanks
would be a nice gesture.
Ephorus|3.26.08 @ 4:46PM|#
It's true. At the first Olympics, old King Iphitos was just
trying to get out of fighting some Spartans.
After that, the whole things was just a scam to generate tourism
revenue for Elis and Pisa.
Anyways, ever since Phidias was commissioned to make that statue,
the whole thing is too commercial.
|3.26.08 @ 4:47PM|#
Abdul,
I say let 'em. To the extent they have a good point it certainly
won't hurt to hear them out. And it's worth the price of listening
to someone rave about Mumia if it means embarrassing China over
Tibet etc.
|3.26.08 @ 4:47PM|#
Speaking of Carter and the Moscow Olympics, did he actually have
to take any illegal steps like confiscating passports, or did he
just proclaim a boycott, and the atheletes complied?
-jcr
|3.26.08 @ 4:53PM|#
In the post-Bush era, I can see plenty of athletes bringing
up Abu Grahib or global warming. Who wants that?
I do! I do!
Abdul|3.26.08 @ 4:59PM|#
In the post-Bush era, I can see plenty of athletes bringing
up Abu Grahib or global warming. Who wants that?
I do! I do!
I still say it would be incredibly disrespectful to President
Chelsea.
|3.26.08 @ 5:01PM|#
But the thought of a nation's government forbidding its
athletes from competing in the Olympics, lest it lend some sort of
legitimacy to our foes, makes me sick.
Agreed. Even though he was a raving lunatic asshole, Bobby Fischer
playing chess in Yugoslavia is not the sort of thing that a
government of adults should be worried about.
I'll watch some track and field events, maybe some boxing. That's
about it. The women's floor exercises and equestrian events don't
really get my neanderthal juices flowing.
|3.26.08 @ 5:01PM|#
You're right, because I think athletes should be able to
compete anywhere in the world, I'm quite obviously a Communist
sympathizer.
No, you're just a fellow traveler, what people in the KGB called
"useful idiots". Someone who believes that a fatuous right to play
in a game is unbreakable even when those games are directly in the
service of propaganda for a totalitarian state. But I don't really
disagree with you that individual athletes should have been allowed
to go the USSR (or Nazi Germany) on their own, but the USA
certainly had and should have the right to refuse its athletes
permission to fly US colors at a propaganda event staged by an
enemy of the US. China is not an enemy of the US so the argument
for a boycott is certainly a lot weaker than it was in 1980.
|3.26.08 @ 5:04PM|#
I remember the Roy Jones, Jr. fight. He got totally
robbed.
I hope the rest of China rises in revolution during the Olympics.
Or before then. Or after.
Incidentally, I'd like to see Taiwan freed from Chinese oppression,
too.
alan|3.26.08 @ 5:05PM|#
Why can't the US have the same rights as a
corporation?
Hurumphh . . .
Reminds me of what one of the anti-Communist Czech dissidents once
wrote in the 80's. In essence, 'If this factory belongs to the
people, than why can I not take what I produce here home with me,
after all, according to the authorities, it belongs to me.'
Your idea would turn the US into a FooBoo- BooBoo, For the
Bureaucrats, By the Bureaucrats, to a greater extent than it
already has become that.
alan|3.26.08 @ 5:08PM|#
I remember the Roy Jones, Jr. fight. He got totally
robbed.
The match he and Felix Trinidad put together a few months ago was
one of the most satisfying matches I have seen in ages. Two
athletes, slightly passed there prime but with far greater skill
than anyone else in their class.
alan|3.26.08 @ 5:13PM|#
He is of course slower now, but in one extent, he is better -- he can actually take a punch now (in the 90's it wasn't necessary for him 'cause no one could seriously hit him).
BakedPenguin|3.26.08 @ 5:23PM|#
The women's floor exercises and equestrian events don't really get my neanderthal juices flowing.
J sub D, you've got to stop setting up the porno jokes.
|3.26.08 @ 5:40PM|#
No, you're just a fellow traveler, what people in the KGB called "useful idiots".
You're awesome.
Please, post some more.
|3.26.08 @ 5:57PM|#
the IOC, an aging collection of fascists almost as obnoxious
as the Politburo.
*bangs shoe on table*
hear, hear!
Individualism and independent thought (amongst athletes) are not
attributes greatly prized by the IOC.
Mark -- Woodward 77-81|3.26.08 @ 5:59PM|#
"Why do people assume that the athletes give a rat's ass about
politics? If I were performing in the games, with the prospect of
glimmering prizes and worldwide celebrity, I doubt I'd endanger it
all by protesting the Commies."
That is so true.
I coached Olympic women gymnasts during the 1980 boycott. The only
remotely political thing I can recall from an athlete was a shirt
that read "Let the Russians Play with themselves" with the three
Olympic rings altered to look like two testicles and a vaguely
erect penis.
D.A. Ridgely|3.26.08 @ 6:27PM|#
Makes no difference.
Vanya will feel differently someday after the sex change operation
when she has Chinese children.
Better?
|3.26.08 @ 6:28PM|#
J sub D, you've got to stop setting up the porno
jokes.
I set 'em up, leaving it for others to knock 'em down.
BakedPenguin|3.26.08 @ 6:33PM|#
J sub D - Had I any sense of humor, that's what I'd have
done.
DAR - Thank you. My sense of narrative closure is now
fulfilled.
|3.26.08 @ 6:35PM|#
The problems for athletes who protest will not come from the Chinese, but from the IOC itself. They risk being sent home or, worse for some, stripped of their medals for "politicizing" the Games. THAT is why the athletes will remain silent. All well and good to sympathize with the Chinese people, or Tibet, but risk my endorsement $$$? Hell No !!!
D.A. Ridgely|3.26.08 @ 6:36PM|#
DAR - Thank you. My sense of narrative closure is now
fulfilled.
You say that now, but you'll feel differently someday when you've
had Vanya's children.
Douglas Gray|3.26.08 @ 7:18PM|#
Remember the "Black Power" salute in Mexico City on the medal
stand? I forget their names, but that was audaciously cool, though
the cause they were promoting sucked.
Why can't someone stick a Tibetan flag into his clothing and hold
it up on the medal stand? That would be loads of fun!!
Matt Schiavenza|3.26.08 @ 8:18PM|#
To the Chinese, the Olympics isn't a vindication of Communism or Communist Party rule so much as an emblem of national pride. The reason Communism persists in China is because, in the years since Mao's takeover, China went from being a weak nation carved up by Western and Japanese power to an economic and diplomatic rising force. All a boycott will accomplish is cause China to dig in its heels...if Applebaum thinks positive outcomes will result, she really has no idea what she's talking about.
Geotpf|3.26.08 @ 8:58PM|#
I hope some athlete, hopefully more than one, make some sort of political statement that throughly embarasses the Chinese government. A boycott is overkill. A "fuck you"-type jesture on world wide television is perfect.
|3.26.08 @ 11:55PM|#
kinnath | March 26, 2008, 3:48pm | #
The Chinese have never been "hulking". You need East Germans for
that.
FAPFAPFAP
Happy Jack|3.27.08 @ 12:45AM|#
the USA certainly had and should have the right to refuse
its athletes permission to fly US colors
I'm curious as to where this "right" comes from.
Warmongering Lunatic|3.27.08 @ 2:55AM|#
Matt Schiavenza --
Nationalism applies to the half of China's area which is inhabited
by the Han. Tibet, Turkestan, and Inner Mongolia are no more
Chinese than Libya is Italian. If the Han choose to be obstreperous
in their imperialism, that is their choice, but non-Han should
still insist on correctly identifying it as imperialism.
Tom|3.27.08 @ 11:46AM|#
The Olympics -- bah. The World Cup is where it's at (as the rest of the world agrees). And not least because FIFA completely bars government involvement in the thing.
|3.27.08 @ 1:44PM|#
The jingoism kills any interest I might have in the Olympics. Not to mention the excessive TV coverage of womens' gymnastics in the summer version and figure skating the winter version. Enough with the underfed pixies and corrupt judging, already.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245